This study, based on terror management theory, employs an experiment to examine how the thought of death affects people’s attitudes toward a watchdog press. Findings suggest that people who most value national security demonstrate less support for a watchdog press when primed to think of death than security-minded participants in a control group. The results provide one potential explanation for rally-around-the-flag effects and for why some people more strongly oppose journalists criticizing the government during times of mortal strife, such as war or terrorist attacks. Implications discussed include suggestions, based on theory, for preventing these attitudinal shifts, and the application of terror management theory to other areas of political communication research.
American Society of Newspaper Editors (2003 ) ASNE memo on the Patriot Act II, February. Available at: http://204.8.120.192/index.cfm?ID=4348
2.
Andsager JL ( 2002) A Constant Tension: Public Support for Free Expression . Stanford Journal of International Law38(1): 3-18.
3.
Ball-Rokeach SJ, DeFleur ML ( 1976) A Dependency Model of Mass Media Effects. Communication Research3(1): 3-21.
4.
Baum M. ( 2002) The Constituent Foundations of the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly46(2): 263-98.
5.
Becker E. ( 1962) The Birth and Death of Meaning. New York: Macmillan.
6.
Becker E. ( 1973) The Denial of Death. New York: Macmillan.
7.
Becker LB, Cobbey RE, Sobowale IA ( 1978) Public Support for the Press. Journalism Quarterly55: 421-30.
8.
Best SJ, Krueger BS, Ladewig J. ( 2006) Privacy in the Information Age. Public Opinion Quarterly70(3): 375-401.
9.
Blanchard MA ( 1992) Free Expression and Wartime: Lessons from the Past, Hopes for the Future. Journalism Quarterly69(1): 5-17.
10.
Blanchard MA ( 2002) Why Can’t We Ever Learn? Cycles of Stability, Stress and Freedom of Expression in United States History. Communication Law and Policy7(4): 347-78.
11.
Blasi V. ( 1977) The Checking Value in First Amendment Theory. Law & Social Inquiry2(3): 521-649.
12.
Bluemink E., Brush M. ( 2005) A Flawed Tool: Environmental Reporters’ Experiences with the Freedom of Information Act. A Report for the Society of Environmental Journalists, September. Available at: http://www.sejarchive.org/foia/SEJ_FOIA_Report2005.pdf
13.
Bose J., Russell N., Giesbrecht L. ( 2004) Nonresponse Bias in a Travel Survey of Non-telephone Households . Paper presented at the meeting of the AAPOR/WAPOR 59th Annual Conference, May, Phoenix, AZ.
14.
Boyle MP, Schmierbach M., Armstrong CL, et al. (2004) Information Seeking and Emotional Reactions to the September 11 Terrorist Attacks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly81(1): 155-67.
15.
Burke BL, Martens A., Faucher EH (in press) Two Decades of Terror Management Theory: A Meta-analysis of Mortality Salience Research. Personality and Social Psychology Review.
16.
Cassel E. ( 2004) The War on Civil Liberties: How Bush and Ashcroft Have Dismantled the Bill of Rights. Chicago, IL: Chicago Review Press.
17.
Cohen F., Ogilvie DM, Solomon S., et al. (2005) American Roulette: The Effect of Reminders of Death on Support for George W. Bush in the 2004 Presidential Election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy5(1): 177-87.
18.
Cohen F., Solomon S., Maxfield M., et al. (2004) Fatal Attraction: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Evaluations of Charismatic, Task-oriented, and Relationship-oriented Leaders. Psychological Science15(12): 646-851.
19.
Davison WP ( 1983) The Third-person Effect in Communication. Public Opinion Quarterly47: 1-15.
20.
Davison WP ( 1996) The Third-person Effect Revisited. International Journal of Public Opinion Research8(2): 113-19.
21.
Dillard JP, Meijnders A. ( 2002) Persuasion and the Structure of Affect. In: Dillard JP, Pfau MThe Persuasion Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 309-26.
22.
Dillon J., Covil E. ( 1998) What Journalists, Judges and Public Consider Defamatory . Newspaper Research Journal19(2): 47-63.
23.
Domke D., Graham E., Coe K., et al. (2006) Going Public as Political Strategy: The Bush Administration, an Echoing Press and Passage of the Patriot Act. Political Communication23(3): 291-312.
24.
Driscoll P., Salwen MB ( 1996) Riding out the Storm: Public Evaluations of News Coverage of Hurricane Andrew. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters14(3): 293-303.
25.
Durand C., Blais A., Vachon S. ( 1999) Sampling and Non-response Biases in Election Surveys: The Case of the Last General Election in Québec. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on Survey Non-response Issues, October, Portland, OR.
26.
Erskine H. ( 1970) The Polls: Freedom of Speech. Public Opinion Quarterly34: 483-96.
27.
Erskine H., Siegel RL ( 1975) Civil Liberties and theAmerican Public. Journal of Social Issues31(2): 13-29.
28.
First Amendment Center (2004) State of the First Amendment 2004. Available at: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/sofa_reports/index.aspx
29.
Gallup (2004) Americans Generally Comfortable with Patriot Act. Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing , March, p. 7.
30.
Greenberg J., Porteus J., Simon L., et al. (1995) Evidence of a Terror Management Function of Cultural Icons: The Effects of Mortality Salience on the Inappropriate Use of Cherished Cultural Symbols. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21(11): 1221-8.
31.
Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T., and Solomon S. ( 1986) The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-esteem: A Terror Management Theory. In: Baumeister RF (ed.) Public Self and Private Self. New York: Springer-Verlag, 189-212.
32.
Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T., Solomon S., et al. (1990) Evidence for Terror Management Theory II: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Reactions to Those Who Threaten or Bolster the Cultural Worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58(2): 308-18.
33.
Greenberg J., Simon L., Pyszczynski T., et al. (1992) Terror Management and Tolerance: Does Mortality Salience Always Intensify Negative Reactions to Others Who Threaten One’s Worldview? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology63: 212-20.
34.
Greenberg J., Solomon S., and Pyszczynski T. ( 1997) Terror Management Theory of Self-esteem and Social Behavior: Empirical Assessments and Conceptual Refinements. In: Zanna MP (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 29. New York: Academic Press, 61-139.
35.
Groves RM, Lyberg LE ( 2001) An Overview of Nonresponse Issues in Telephone Surveys . In: Groves RM et al. (eds) Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: John Wiley, 191-212.
36.
Gunther A. ( 1995) Overrating the X-rating: The Third-person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography. Journal of Communication45(1): 27-38.
Hansen ES, Moore RL ( 1992) Public Attitudes toward Libel: Do Newspaper Readers and Editors See Eye-to-Eye?Newspaper Research Journal13(3): 2-12.
39.
Harmon-Jones E., Simon L., Greenberg J., et al. (1997) Terror Management Theory and Self-esteem: Evidence that Increased Self-esteem Reduces MS Effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72: 24-36.
40.
Hernon P. ( 1996) Government Information Policy in a Time of Uncertainty and Change. In: Hernon P, McClure CR, and Relyea HC (eds) Federal Information Policies in the 1990s: Views and Perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corp, 1-18.
41.
Hindman DB ( 2004) Media System Dependency and Public Support for the Press and President. Mass Communication & Society7(1): 29-42.
42.
Hindman DB, Coyle K. ( 1999) Audience Orientations to Local Radio Coverage of a Natural Disaster. Journal of Radio Studies6(1): 8-26.
43.
Huddy L., Khatib N., and Capelos T. ( 2002) The Polls: Reactions to the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001. Public Opinion Quarterly66(3): 418-50.
44.
Immerwahr J., Doble J. ( 1982) Public Attitudes toward Freedom of the Press. Public Opinion Quarterly46(2): 177-95.
45.
Johnson M. ( 1999) How Identifying Rape Victim Affects Readers’ Perceptions . Newspaper Research Journal20(2): 64-80.
46.
Joireman J., Duell B. ( 2005) Mother Teresa versus Ebenezer Scrooge: Mortality Salience Leads Proselfs to Endorse Self-transcendent Values (unless Proselfs Are Reassured) . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin31(3): 307-20.
47.
Jonas E., Schimel J., Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T. ( 2002) The Scrooge Effect: Evidence that Mortality Salience Increases Prosocial Attitudes and Behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28(10): 1342-53.
48.
Keeter S., Miller C., Kohut A., et al. (2000) Consequences of Reducing Non-response in a National Telephone Survey. Public Opinion Quarterly64(2): 125-48.
49.
Kirtley JE ( 2006) Transparency and Accountability in a Time of Terror: The Bush Administration’s Assault on Freedom of Information. Communication Law & Policy11(4): 479-509.
50.
Konty M., Duell B., and Joireman J. ( 2004) Scared Selfish: A Culture of Fear’s Values in the Age of Terrorism. The American Sociologist35(2): 93-109.
51.
Kunda Z. ( 1999) Social Cognition: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Kuusela V., Vikki K. ( 1999) Change of Telephone Coverage Due to Mobile Telephones . Paper presented at the meeting of the International Conference on Survey Non-response Issues, October, Portland, OR.
53.
Lambe J. ( 2004) Who Wants to Censor Pornography and Hate Speech? Mass Communication & Society7(3): 279-99.
54.
Landau MJ, Solomon S., Greenberg J., et al. (2004) Deliver Us from Evil: The Effects of Mortality Salience and Reminders of 9/11 on Support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(9): 1136-50.
55.
Lindeman M., Verkasalo M. ( 2005) Measuring Values with the Short Schwartz’s Value Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment85(2): 170-8.
56.
Link MW, Oldendick RW ( 1999) Call Screening: Is it Really a Problem for Survey Research ? Public Opinion Quarterly63(4): 577-89.
57.
Lo V., Wei R. ( 2002) Third-person Effect, Gender, and Pornography on the Internet . Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media46(1): 13-33.
58.
McGregor H., Lieberman J., Greenberg J., et al. (1998) Terror Management and Aggression: Evidence that Mortality Salience Motivates Aggression against Worldview-threatening Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology74(3): 590-606.
59.
McLeod JM, Eveland WP Jr, and Nathanson AI ( 1997) Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics: An Analysis of the Third-person Effect. Communication Research24: 153-74.
60.
McLeod JM, Sotirovic M., Voakes PS, et al. (1998) A Model of Public Support for First Amendment Rights. Communication Law and Policy3(4): 479-514.
61.
Martens A., Greenberg J., Schimel J., and Landau MJ ( 2004) Ageism and Death: Effects of Mortality Salience and Perceived Similarity to Elders on Reactions to Elderly People. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin30(12): 1524-36.
62.
Meiklejohn A. ( 1948) Free Speech and its Relation to Self-government. New York: Harper.
63.
Monroe AD ( 1998) Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980-1993. Public Opinion Quarterly62(1): 6-28.
64.
Mueller JE ( 1970) Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson. American Political Scientist Review64(1): 18-34.
65.
Mutz DC ( 1989) The Influence of Perceptions of Media Influence: Third Person Effects and the Public Expression of Opinions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research1: 2-23.
66.
Nabi RL ( 2002) Discrete Emotions and Persuasion. In: Dillard JP, Pfau MThe Persuasion Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 289-308.
67.
Nelson L., Moore DL, Olivetti J., and Scott T. ( 1997) General and Personal Mortality Salience and Nationalistic Bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23: 884-92.
68.
Noelle-Neumann E. ( 1974) The Spiral of Silence: A Theory of Public Opinion. Journal of Communication24: 43-51.
69.
Noelle-Neumann E. ( 1993) The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion - Our Social Skin . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
Oda S. ( 1996) The Role of Broadcasting Media in Providing Disaster-related News and Information. Studies of Broadcasting32: 33-57.
71.
Oldendick RW, Link MW ( 1994) The Answering Machine Generation: Who Are They and What Problems Do They Pose for Survey Research? Public Opinion Quarterly58(2): 264-73.
72.
Oskamp S., Schultz PW ( 2005) Attitudes and Opinions. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
73.
Page BI, Shapiro RY ( 1983) Effects of Public Opinion on Policy. American Journal of Political Science77: 175-90.
74.
Parker SL ( 1995) Toward Understanding of ‘Rally’ Effects: Public Opinion in the Persian Gulf War. Public Opinion Quarterly59(4): 526-46.
75.
Perloff RM ( 1993) Third-person Effect Research, 1983-1992: A Review and Synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research5: 167-84.
76.
Perloff RM ( 1999) The Third-person Effect: A Critical Review and Synthesis . Media Psychology1(4): 353-78.
77.
Pew Research Center (2001) Terror Coverage Boost News Media’s Images but Military Censorship Backed, 28 November. Available at: http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=143
78.
Pew Research Center (2002) News Media’s Improved Image Proves Short-lived, 4 August. Available at: http://people-press.org/reports/display.php3?ReportID=159
79.
Poindexter PM, Heider D., and McCombs M. ( 2006) Watchdog or Good Neighbor? The Public’s Expectations of Local News. Press/Politics11(1): 77-88.
80.
Pratkanis A., Aronson E. ( 2001) Age of Propaganda. New York: Henry Holt.
81.
Prothro JW, Grigg CM ( 1960) Fundamental Principles of Democracy: Bases of Agreement and Disagreement. Journal of Politics22: 276-94.
82.
Pyszczynski T., Abdollahi A., Solomon S., et al. (2006) Mortality Salience, Martyrdom, and Military Might: The Great Satan versus the Axis of Evil. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin32(4): 525-37.
83.
Pyszczynski TA, Solomon S., and Greenberg J. ( 2003) In the Wake of 9/11: The Psychology of Terror. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
84.
Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press ( 2005) Homefront Confidential: How the War on Terrorism Affects Access to Information and the Public’s Right to Know, September. Available at: http://www.rcfp.org/homefrontconfidential/
85.
Roberts A. ( 2006) Blacked out: Government Secrecy in the Information Age . New York: Cambridge University Press.
86.
Rojas H., Shah DV, and Faber RJ ( 1996) For the Good of Others: Censorship and the Third-person Effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research8: 163-86.
87.
Rosenblatt A., Greenberg J., Solomon S., et al. (1989) Evidence for Terror Management Theory I: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Reactions to Those Who Violate or Uphold Cultural Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology57(4): 681-90.
88.
Ross SD ( 2002) An Apologia to Radical Dissent and a Supreme Court Test to Protect It. Communication Law and Policy7(4): 401-30.
89.
Salwen MB ( 1998) Perceptions of Media Influence and Support for Censorship: The Third-person Effect in the 1996 Presidential Election. Communication Research25(3): 259-85.
90.
Salwen MB, Driscoll P. ( 1997) Consequences of Third-person Perception in Support of Press Restrictions in the O. J. Simpson Trial. Journal of Communication47(2): 60-78.
91.
Scheufele DA, Nisbet MC, and Ostman RE ( 2005) September 11 News Coverage, Public Opinion, and Support for Civil Liberties. Mass Communication & Society8(3): 197-218.
92.
Schimel J., Simon L., Greenberg J., et al. (1999) Stereotypes and Terror Management: Evidence that Mortality Salience Enhances Stereotypic Thinking and Preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology77(5): 905-27.
93.
Schwartz SH ( 1992) Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In: Zanna MP (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 25. San Diego, CA: Academic Press , 1-65.
94.
Schwartz SH ( 1994) Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues50(4): 19-45.
95.
Schwartz SH, Rubel T. ( 2005) Sex Differences in Value Priorities: Cross-cultural and Multi-method Studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology89(6): 1010-28.
96.
Siebert FS ( 1952) Freedom of the Press in England, 1476-1776. Urbana: University of Illinois.
97.
Smith CR ( 2002) Patterns of Suppression in Times of Crisis. Free Speech Yearbook39: 8-25.
98.
Stouffer S. ( 1955) Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. New York: Peter Smith.
99.
Stovall JJ, Cotter PR ( 1992) The Public Plays Reporter: Attitudes Toward Reporting on Public Officials. Journal of Mass Media Ethics7(2): 97-106.
100.
Teitler JO, Reichman N., and Sprachman S. ( 2003) Costs and Benefits of Improving Response Rates for a Hard-to-reach Population. Public Opinion Quarterly67(1): 127-38.
101.
Watson D., Clark LA ( 1992) On Traits and Temperament: General and Specific Factors of Emotional Experience and their Relation to the Five Factor Model. Journal of Personality60: 441-76.
102.
Watson D., Clark LA, and Tellegren A. ( 1988) Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54: 1063-70.
103.
Waxman HA ( 2004) Secrecy in the Bush Administration. Report to the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform , Minority Staff Special Investigations Division, 4 September. Available at: http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/waxman.pdf
104.
Weitzel P. ( 2004) Beware Regulatory Creep as Secrecy Shrouds Records. The IRE Journal27(6): 15.
105.
Wu W., Koo SH ( 2001) Perceived Effects of Sexually Explicit Internet Content: The Third-person Effect in Singapore. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly78(2): 260-74.
106.
Wyatt RO ( 1991) Free Expression and the American Public: A Survey Commemorating the 200th Anniversary of the First Amendment. Washington, DC: American Society of Newspaper Editors.
107.
Yalof DA, Dautrich K. ( 2002) The First Amendment and the Media in the Court of Public Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
108.
Zajonc RB ( 1998) Emotions. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, and Lindzey GThe Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. 1. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 591-632.
