What kinds of feminist projects are made possible by (dis)analogising race and gender and/or transing them? The article asserts that an arbitrary separation is enacted when the transgender-transracial question is pulled apart such that an examination of the conceptual prefix that connects the two, i.e. trans, is discarded for an examination of the elements that allow for their separation – race and gender. Rather than affirm a (dis)analogy between race and gender, the article offers two correctives to the feminist discourse around transracialism / the possibility of reading race as malleable. First, I contest the shock value of transracialism by suggesting that a modality of transracial crossing has existed in the feminist imagination in the form of transnational, diasporic crossings that are separate, though not disparate, from transgender crossings. Second, through a glimpse into the history of racial prerequisite cases in early twentieth-century USA, I suggest the necessity of deploying trans analytics to understand the ways in which race has been made unevenly malleable in highly regulated and contested ways for different populations in different historical contexts. Race operated as fluid, flexible terrain accessed and claimed through discourses of citizenship and diaspora with mixed success. Hence, the article offers diaspora and citizenship, rather than the cultural and biological, as key analytics that enable the mapping of trans formations through patterns of migration and movement.
Akhay Kumar Mozumdar v. United States, 299 F. 240 (1924) U.S. App. LEXIS 2546 Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
2.
AndersonBenedict (1998) The Spectre of Comparisons: Nationalism, Southeast Asia, and the World. New York and London: Verso.
3.
BettcherTalia Mae (2015) ‘Intersexuality, Transgender, and Transsexuality’. In: Lisa DischHawkesworthMary (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.407–427.
4.
BhabhaHomi (1984) Of Mimicry and Man: the Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse. MIT Press.
BottsTina Fernandes (2018a) ‘In Black and White: a Hermeneutic Argument Against’. Res Philosophica, 95(2): 303–329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1626.
BrubakerRoger (2016) Trans, Gender and Race in an Age of Unsettled Identities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400883233.
9.
ButlerJudith (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
ChowRey (1994) ‘Where Have the Natives Gone?’. In: Angelika Bammer (ed.) Displacements: Cultural Identities in Question. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp.122–146.
13.
DuttaAniruddha (2018) ‘Allegories of Gender: Transgender Autology versus Transracialism’. Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice, 39(2): 86–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1064075ar.
14.
FairchildHenry Pratt (1924) ‘The Immigration Law of 1924’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 38(4): 653–665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1884595.
15.
Gill-PetersonJulian (2018) Histories of the Transgender Child. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
16.
GopinathGayatri (2005) Impossible Desires: Queer Diaspora and South Asian Public Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
17.
HalleyJanet (2000) ‘“Like Race” Arguments’. In: ButlerJudithGullaryJohnThomasKendall (eds) What’s Left of Theory: New Work on the Politics of Literary Theory. London: Taylor & Francis Group, pp.40–74.
18.
In re Akhay Kumar Mozumdar, 207 F. 115, 1913 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1301 (1913) District Court, E.d. Washington.
19.
LopezIan Haney ([1996] 2006) White by Law: the Legal Construction of Race. 10th anniversary edn.New York: NYU Press.
20.
LoveHeather (2007) Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
MannurAnitaBrazielJane Evans (2015) ‘Diaspora’. In: Lisa DischHawkesworthMary (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.164–176.
22.
MeadowTey (2017) ‘Whose Chosenness Counts? The Always-Already Racialized Discourse of Trans – Response to Rogers Brubaker’. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(8): 1306–1311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1303178.
PuarJasbir (2017) The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Duke University Press.
30.
RobinsonCedric (2000) Black Marxism: the Making of the Black Radical Tradition. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
31.
SchuellerMalini Johar (2005) ‘Analogy and (White) Feminist Theory: Thinking Race and the Color of the Cyborg Body’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 31(1): 63–92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/431372.
32.
SchullerKyla (2018) The Biopolitics of Feeling: Race, Sex, and Science in the Nineteenth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822372356.
SnortonC. Riley (2017) Black on Both Sides: a Racial History of Trans Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
37.
SpadeDean (2015) Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374794.
38.
SpillersHortense J. (1987) ‘Mama’s Baby, Papa’s Maybe: An American Grammar Book’. Diacritics, 17(2): 65–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/464747.
39.
StrathernMarilyn (2005) Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
TowleEvan B.MorganLynn Marie (2002) ‘Romancing the Transgender Native: Rethinking the Use of the “Third Gender” Concept’. GLQ: a Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 8(4): 469–497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-8-4-469.
WiegmanRobyn (2012) Object Lessons. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
47.
Zwick-MaitreyiMaariSoundararajanThenmozhiDarNatasha (2018) Caste in the United States: a Survey of Caste Among South Asian Americans. Report, Equality Labs. Oakland, CA. Available at: https://www.equalitylabs.org/castesurvey (accessed 3 July 2020).
