This article examines the reparative turn in current queer feminist scholarship by tracking its twin interest in the study of affect and time. By foregrounding Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s influential critique of what she called paranoid reading, I am interested in the ways that various critics – Ann Cvetkovich, Heather Love, and Elizabeth Freeman in particular – take up the call for reparative reading by using the temporal frameworks of the everyday, backward feeling, and queer time to reparative ends. In the process, I consider the reparative work being done to reclaim Sedgwick as a major thinker for queer feminist concerns, and speculate on the attraction, in a time of declining economic and cultural support for the interpretative humanities, of a critical practice that seeks to love and nurture its objects of study.
KleinMelanie (1975) Love, Guilt and Reparation and Other Works 1921–1945, New York: The Free Press.
31.
KleinMelanieJoanRiviere (1964) Love, Hate and Reparation, New York: Norton.
32.
LeysRuth (2011) ‘The Turn to Affect: A Critique’. Critical Inquiry37(3): 434–472.
33.
LoveHeather (2007) Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
LoveHeather (2010) ‘Truth and Consequences: On Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading’. Criticism52(2): 235–241.
35.
Messer-DavidowEllen (2002) Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36.
MillerD. A. (1989) The Novel and the Police, Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
Muñoz, JoséEsteban (2006) ‘Feeling Brown, Feeling Down: Latina Affect, the Performativity of Race, and the Depressive Position’. Signs31(3): 675–688.
38.
Muñoz, JoséEsteban (2009) Cruising Utopia: The Then and Now of Queer Futurity, New York: New York University Press.
39.
PedwellCarolynAnneWhitehead (2012) ‘Affecting Feminism: Questions of Feeling in Feminist Theory’. Feminist Theory13(2): 115–129.
40.
PovinelliElizabeth (2011) Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
RooneyEllen (2010) ‘Live Free or Describe: The Reading Effect and the Persistence of Form’. differences21(3): 112–139.
42.
RubinGayle (1984) ‘Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality’. In: CaroleS. Vance (eds) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality, New York: Routledge, Kegan and Paul, pp. 267–319.
43.
ScottJoan (2011) The Fantasy of Feminist History, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
44.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky (1985) Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire, New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky (1990) Epistemology of the Closet, Berkeley: University of California Press.
46.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky (1996) ‘Introduction: Queerer than Fiction’. Studies in the Novel28(3): 277–280.
47.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky (1997) ‘Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading; or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Introduction Is about You’. In: EveKosofsky Sedgwick (eds) Novel Gazing: Queer Readings in Fiction, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–37.
48.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky (2003) ‘Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, or You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay is About You’. In: EveKosofsky Sedgwick (eds) Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 123–151.
49.
SedgwickEve Kosofsky (2007) ‘Melanie Klein and the Difference Affect Makes’. South Atlantic Quarterly106(3): 625–642.
50.
SedgwickEve KosofskyAdamFrank (1995) ‘Shame in the Cybernetic Fold: Reading Silvan Tomkins’. Critical Inquiry21(1): 496–522.
51.
StewartKathleen (2008) ‘Weak Theory in an Unfinished World’. Journal of Folklore Research45(1): 71–82.
52.
StewartKathleen (2011) ‘Atmospheric Attunements’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29(3): 445–453.
53.
WeedElizabeth (2012) ‘Intervention: “The Way We Read Now”’. History of the Present2(1): 95–106.
54.
WiegmanRobyn (2000) ‘Feminism’s Apocalyptic Futures’. New Literary History31(4): 805–825.
55.
WiegmanRobyn (2012) Object Lessons, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
