Archaeology takes up material fragments from distant and recent pasts to create narratives of personal and collective identity. It is, therefore, a powerful voice shaping our current and future social worlds. Feminist theory has to date made little reference to archaeology and its projects, in part because archaeologists have primarily chosen to work with normative forms of gender theory rather than forge new theory informed by archaeological insights. This paper argues that archaeology has considerably more potential for feminist theorizing than has so far been recognized. In particular it is uniquely placed to build theory for understanding change, transition and transformation over extended time periods, a potential explored through an archaeological case study of Pacific Northwest Coast people. In conclusion, some possibilities for expanding this case study into a wider comparative perspective are sketched out.
Alberti, B. (2001) `Faience Goddesses and Ivory Bull-leapers: The Aesthetics of Sexual Difference at Late Bronze Age Knossos', World Archaeology33(2): 189—205.
2.
Alberti, B. (2002) `Gender and the Figurative Art of Late Bronze Age Knossos', pp. 98—119 in Y. Hamilakis (ed.) Labyrinth Revisited: Rethinking `Minoan' Archaeology . Oxford: Oxbow Books.
3.
Ames, K.M. and H.D.G. Maschner (1999) Peoples of the Northwest Coast. London: Thames and Hudson .
4.
Bagnal, R. (1990) `The Experience and Identity of “Woman”: Feminism after Structuralism', pp. 103—26 in I. Bapty and T. Yates (eds) Archaeology after Structuralism: Post-structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology . London: Routledge.
5.
Baker, M. (1998a) `Feminist Post-Structuralist Engagements with History', Rethinking History2(3): 371—8.
6.
Baker, M. (1998b) `Italian Gender Theory and Archaeology: A Political Engagement', pp. 23—33 in R. D. Whitehouse (ed.) Gender and Italian Archaeology: Challenging the Stereotypes . Accordia Specialist Studies on Italy 7, Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London.
7.
Baker, M. (2000) `Gender: Enabling Perspective or Politically Correct Term? An Analysis of How Gender and Material Culture are Viewed by 1990's Academia', pp. 56—68 in M. McDonald and L. Hurcombe (eds) Gender and Material Culture in Archaeological Perspective. London: Macmillan Press.
8.
Bancroft-Hunt, N. and W. Forman (1979) People of the Totem. London : Book Club Associates.
9.
Bapty, I. and T. Yates, eds (1990) Archaeology after Structuralism: Post-structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology. London : Routledge.
10.
Bender, B. (2000) `Introduction', pp. xix—xxix in M. McDonald and L. Hurcombe (eds) Representations of Gender from Prehistory to Present. London: Macmillan Press.
11.
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
12.
Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of `Sex'. New York: Routledge.
13.
Butler, J. (1997) `Against Proper Objects', pp. 1—30 in E. Weed and N. Schor (eds) Feminism Meets Queer Theory. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
14.
Butler, J. (2004) Undoing Gender. New York: Routledge.
15.
Claassen, C. (2000) `Homophobia and Women Archaeologists', World Archaeology32(2): 173—9.
16.
Conkey, M.W. (1991) `Does It Make a Difference? Feminist Thinking and Archaeologies of Gender', pp. 24—33 in D. Walde and D. Willows (eds) The Archaeology of Gender. Calgary: The Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
Conkey, M.W. and J.M. Gero (1991) `Tensions, Pluralities and Engendering Archaeology: An Introduction to Women and Prehistory', pp. 3—30 in J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey (eds) Engendering Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
19.
Conkey, M.W. and J. Gero (1997) `From Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology', Annual Review of Anthropology7: 1—32.
20.
Dobres, M. (2000) Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
21.
Duff, W. (1975) images stone b.c. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
22.
Foxhall, L. and J. Salmon , eds (1998a) Thinking Men: Masculinity and its Self-Represenation in the Classical Tradition. London : Routledge.
23.
Foxhall, L. and J. Salmon , eds (1998b) When Men Were Men: Masculinity, Power and Identity in Classical Antiquity. London: Routledge.
24.
Gosden, C. and Y.M. Marshall (1999) `The Cultural Biography of Objects', World Archaeology31(2): 169—78.
25.
Grosz, E. (1994) Volatile Bodies. London: Routledge.
26.
Haraway, D. (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. London: Routledge.
27.
Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women. London: Routledge.
28.
Herdt, G. H., ed. (1984) Ritualised Homosexuality in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Herdt, G.H. (1987) The Sambia: Ritual and Gender in New Guinea. Orlando, FL: Harcourt College Publishers.
30.
Herzig, R. (2004) `On Performance, Productivity, and Vocabularies of Motive in Recent Studies of Science', Feminist Theory5(2): 127—48.
31.
Hewlett, B.S. (1992) Intimate Fathers: The Nature and Context of Aka Pygmy Paternal Infant Care. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
32.
Hodder, I. (1990) The Domestication of Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
33.
hooks, b. (1981) Ain't I a Woman? Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.
34.
Hoskins, J. (1998) Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives. London: Routledge .
35.
Ingraham, C. (1999) White Weddings: Romancing Heterosexuality in Popular Culture. London: Routledge.
36.
Ingraham, C., ed. (2005) Thinking Straight: The Power, the Promise and the Paradox of Heterosexuality. London: Routledge.
37.
Jackson, S. (1999) Heterosexuality in Question. London: SAGE.
38.
Jackson, S. (2005) `Sexuality, Heterosexuality and Gender Hierarchy: Getting Our Priorities Straight', pp. 15—38 in C. Ingraham (ed.) Thinking Straight: The Power, the Promise and the Paradox of Heterosexuality. London: Routledge.
39.
Jackson, S. (2006) `Gender, Sexuality and Heterosexuality: The Complexity (and Limits) of Heteronormativity', Feminist Theory7(1): 105—21.
40.
Joyce, R.A. (1998) `Performing the Body in Prehispanic Central America' , Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics33: 147—65.
41.
Joyce, R.A. (2000) Gender and Power in Prehispanic Mesoamerica. Austin: University of Texas Press.
42.
Joyce, R.A. (2004) `Embodied Subjectivity: Gender, Femininity, Masculinity and Sexuality', pp. 82—95 in L. Meskell and R. W. Preucel (eds) A Companion to Social Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
Kuper, A. (1988) The Invention of Primitive Society. London: Routledge.
44.
Malinowski, B. (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge.
45.
Marshall, Y.M. (1989) `The House in Northwest Coast, Nuu-chah-nulth, Society: The Material Structure of Political Action', pp. 15—21 in S. MacEachern, D. J. W. Archer and R. D. Garvin (eds) Households and Communities. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Chacmool Conference, Calgary, University of Calgary Archaeological Association.
46.
Marshall, Y.M. (1993) `Dangerous Liaisons: Maquinna, Quadra and Vancouver in Nootka Sound, 1790—5', pp. 160—75 in R. Fisher and H. Johnston (eds) From Maps to Metaphors. Vancouver: UBC Press.
47.
Marshall, Y.M. (2000a) `Reading images stone bc', World Archaeology32(2): 222—35.
48.
Marshall, Y.M. (2000b) `Transformations of Nuu-chah-nulth Houses', pp. 73—102 in R. A. Joyce and S. D. Gillespie (eds) Beyond Kinship: Social and Material Reproduction in House Societies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
49.
Marshall, Y.M. (2000c) `The Changing Art and Architecture of Potlatch Houses at Yuquot', pp. 107—30 in A. L. Hoover (ed.) Nuu-chah-nulth Voices, Histories, Objects and Journeys. Victoria: Royal British Columbia Museum.
50.
Marshall, Y.M. (2006) `Houses and Domestication on the Northwest Coast ', pp. 37—56 in E. Sobel, D. A. Trieu Gahr and K. M. Ames (eds) Household Archaeology on the Northwest Coast . Archaeological Series16, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.
51.
Meskell, L. (1996) `The Somatisation of Archaeology: Discourses, Institutions, Corporeality', Norwegian Archaeological Review29(1): 1—16.
52.
Meskell, L. (1999) Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class in Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Blackwell .
53.
Meskell, L. (2001) `Archaeologies of Identity', pp. 187—213 in I. Hodder (ed.) Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity.
54.
Meskell, L. and R.A. Joyce (2003) Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience. London: Routledge.
55.
Meskell, L. and R.W. Preucel (2004) `Identities', pp. 121—41 in L. Meskell and R. W. Preucel (eds) A Companion to Social Archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
Moi, T. (1999) What is a Woman? And Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57.
Moogk, S. (1980) `The Wolf Masks of the Nootka Wolf Ritual: A Statement on Transformation', unpublished MA thesis, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
58.
Moogk, S. (1991) `The Construction of “Woman” in the Nuu-chah-nulth Girl's Puberty Ceremony in 1910', pp. 103—7 in D. Walde and D. Willows (eds) The Archaeology of Gender. Calgary : The Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
59.
Moore, H.L. (1986) Space, Text and Gender: An Anthropological Study of the Marakwet of Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Moore, H.L. (1994) A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Cambridge: Polity.
61.
Nordbladh, J. and T. Yates (1990) `This Perfect Body, this Virgin Text: Between Sex and Gender in Archaeology', pp. 222—39 in I. Bapty and T. Yates (eds) Archaeology after Structuralism: Post-structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology . London: Routledge.
62.
Perry, E.M. and R.A. Joyce (2001) `Providing a Past for Bodies that Matter: Judith Butler's Impact on the Archaeology of Gender', International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies6: 63—76.
63.
Pyburn, A., ed. (2004) Ungendering Civilization. London: Routledge .
64.
Riley, D. (1988) Am I that Name? Feminism and the Category of Women in History. Basingstoke: Macmillan .
65.
Robin, C. (2006) `Gender, Farming and Long-term Change: Maya Historical and Archaeological Perspectives', Current Anthropology47(3): 409—34.
66.
Rubin, G. (2000) `Sites, Settlements and Urban Sex: Archaeology and the Study of Gay Leathermen in San Francisco', pp. 62—88 in R. A. Schmidt and B. L. Voss (eds) Archaeologies of Sexuality. London: Routledge.
67.
Schmidt, R. A. and B. L. Voss, eds (2000) Archaeologies of Sexuality . London: Routledge.
68.
Shapin, S. (1998) `The Philosopher and the Chicken: On the Dietetics of Disembodied Knowledge', pp. 21—50 in S. Shapin and C. Lawrence (eds) Science Incarnate: Historical Embodiments of Natural Knowledge. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
69.
She (2000) `Sex and a Career', World Archaeology32(2): 166—73.
70.
Sobel, E., D. A. Trieu Gahr and K. M. Ames, eds (2006) Household Archaeology on the Northwest Coast . Archaeological Series16, International Monographs in Prehistory, Ann Arbor.
71.
Sofaer, J.R. (2006) The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strathern, M. (1988) The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley : University of California Press.
74.
Voss, B.L. (2000) `Feminisms, Queer Theories, and the Archaeological Study of Past Sexualities', World Archaeology32(2): 180—92.
75.
Wilkie, L.A. (2003) The Archaeology of Mothering: An African-American Midwife's Tale. London: Routledge .
76.
Wilkie, L.A. and K.H. Hayes (in press) `Engendered and Feminist Archaeologies of the Recent and Documented Pasts', Journal of Archaeological Research.
77.
Wylie, A. (1992) `The Interplay of Evidential Constraints and Political Interests: Recent Archaeological Research on Gender', American Antiquity59: 15—35.
78.
Wylie, A. (2002) Thinking from Things: Essays in the Philosophy of Archaeology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79.
Yates, T. (1993) `Frameworks for an Archaeology of the Body', pp. 31—72 in C. Tilly (ed.) Interpretative Archaeology. Oxford: Berg.
80.
Young, I.M. (2005) On Female Body Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
