This article discusses and develops some recent debates in feminist epistemology, by outlining the concept of an ‘emancipatory value’. It outlines the optimum conditions that a ‘community’ of knowers must satisfy in order that its members have the best chance of producing knowledge claims. The article thus covers general ground in epistemology. The article also argues that one of the conditions that any ‘emancipatory community’ must satisfy is that its underlying values should not oppress women. It is related to feminist debates, therefore, in two ways: first, it develops its arguments by drawing on those debates; and second, after developing the general concepts of emancipatory value and epistemic community, it argues that feminist values are one set of emancipatory values to which an epistemic community should pay regard.
Assiter, A.
(1990) Althusser and Feminism.London: Pluto Press.
6.
Assiter, A.
(1996) Enlightened Women. London: Routledge.
7.
Benhabib, S.
(1992) Situating the Self, Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. London: Routledge.
8.
Brah, A.
(1997) Cartographies of Diaspora.London: Routledge.
9.
Braidotti, R.
(1991) Patterns of Dissonance.Cambridge: Polity Press.
10.
Code, L.
(1991) What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.New York: Cornell.
11.
Coker, C.
(1994) War and the Twentieth Century.London: Brasseys.
12.
Comte, A.
(1853) The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte, trans. and condensed by Harriet Martineau. London: Chapman.
13.
Craig, E.
(1990) Knowledge and the State of Nature – An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14.
Dalmiya, V.
and Alcoff, L. (1993) ‘Are “Old Wives” Tales Justified?’, pp. 217–245 in L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds) Feminist Epistemologies. London and New York: Routledge.
15.
de Weitz, S.
(1999) ‘Reasonableness, Pluralism and Justice: A Pragmatic Approach’, pp. 84–94 in the conference volume The Liberal Order: The Future for Social Justice.Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacky University.
16.
Fraser, N.
and L.J. Nicholson (1990) ‘Social Criticism without Criticism’, pp. 19–38 in L.J. Nicholson (ed.) Feminism/Postmodernism.London: Routledge.
17.
Frege, G.
(1960) Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. and trans. by P. Geach and M. Black. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18.
Fricker, M.
(1998) ‘Rational Authority and Social Power: Towards a Truly Social Epistemology’, Aristotelian Society ProceedingsXCVIII: 159–177.
19.
Gellner, E.
(1992) Reason and Culture, New Perspectives on the Past.Oxford: Blackwell.
20.
Gilroy, P.
(1993) The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. London: Verso.
21.
Graham, K.
(1996) ‘Coping with the Many-coloured Dome’, pp. 135–147 in D. Archard (ed.) Philosophy and Pluralism.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Griffiths, M.
(1995) Feminisms and the Self: The Web of Identity. London: Routledge.
23.
Habermas, J.
(1972) Knowledge and Human Interests, trans. J.J. Shapiro. London: Heinemann.
24.
Hall, R.
(1983) The Well of Loneliness. London: Virago.
25.
Harding, S.
(1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Harding, S.
(1991) Whose Science, Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Harding, S.
(1993) ‘Rethinking Standpoint Epistemologies: What is Strong Objectivity?’, pp. 49–83 in L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds) Feminist Epistemologies.London: Routledge.
28.
Hartstock, N.
(1983a) Money, Sex and Power.New York: Longman.
29.
Hartstock, N.
(1983b) ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’, pp. 311–332 in S. Harding and M. Hintikka (eds) Discovering Reality. London: Reidel.
30.
Hegel, G.W.F.
(1967) The Phenomenology of Mind, trans. J.B. Baillie. New York: Harper and Row.
31.
Hekman, S.
(1995) Moral Voices, Moral Selves: Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
32.
Hempel, K.
(1965) Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York: Free Press.
33.
Hesse, M.
(1974) The Structure of Scientific Inference.London: Macmillan.
34.
Hill-Collins, P.
(1991) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment.New York and London: Routledge.
35.
Kuhn, T.
(1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
36.
Lakatos, J.
and A. Musgrave (eds) (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Lawrence, P.
(1998) ‘War and Exclusion: The Aesthetics of Modernist Violence’, Global Society12(1): 103–124.
38.
Lehrer, K.
(1978) Knowledge.Oxford: Clarendon Press.
39.
Lennon, K.
(1997) ‘Reply to Longin O', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. LXX1: 37–54.
40.
Longino, H.
(1997) ‘Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian SocietySupp. Vol. LXX1: 19–37.
41.
Lyotard, J.-F.
(1979) The Postmodern Condition.Manchester: Manchester University Press.
42.
MacIntyre, A.
(1981) After Virtue. Paris: Notre Dame University Press.
43.
Milgram, S.
(1974) Obedience to Authority, An Experimental View. London: Tavistock.
44.
Mill, J.S.
(1982) On Liberty, edited and with an introduction by Gertrude Himmelfarb. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
45.
Newton-Smith, W.H.
(1981) The Rationality of Science. London: Routledge.
46.
Nussbaum, M.
(1990) Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
Pateman, C.
(1988) The Sexual Contract.Cambridge: Polity Press.
48.
Popper, K.
(1962) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
49.
Popper, K.
(1963) Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.
50.
Rawls, J.
(1972) A Theory of Justice.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
Said, E.
(1992) The Culture of Imperialism. London: Chatto and Windus.
52.
Sandel, M.
(1995) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Seller, A.
(1988) ‘Realism versus Relativism: Towards a Politically Adequate Epistemology’, pp. 169–186 in M. Griffiths and M. Whitford (eds) Feminist Perspectives in Philosophy.London: Macmillan.
54.
Seller, A.
(1994) ‘Should the Feminist Philosopher Stay at Home?’, pp. 230–249 in K. Lennon and M. Whitford (eds) Knowing the Difference, Feminist Perspectives in Epistemology.London: Routledge.
55.
Shanley, M.
and C. Pateman (1991) Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
56.
Sherwin, S.
(1994) ‘Abortion through a Feminist Ethics Lens’, in A.M. Jaggar (ed.) Living with Contradictions – Controversies in Feminist Social Ethics.Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
57.
Stanley, L.
(ed.) (1997) Knowing Feminisms. London: Sage.
58.
Taylor, C.
(1992) ‘The Politics of Recognition’, pp. 25–73 in A. Gutmann (ed.) Multiculturalism and the Politics of Recognition.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
Walzer, M.
(1983) Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.
60.
Willis, E.
(1993) ‘Is a Woman a Person?’, in J. Kourany, J. Sterba and R. Tong (eds) Feminist Philosophies.Brighton: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
61.
Wittgenstein, L.
(1953) Philosophical Investigations, trans. and ed. by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
Yuval-Davis, N.
(1997) Gender and Nation. London: Sage.
63.
Zubaida, S.
(ed.) (1970) Race and Racialism. London: Tavistock Publications.
