Agricultural waste-based lignocellulosic natural fillers and fibres are alternatives to synthetic fibres for developing sustainable composite products. The heterogeneity in the structure of the natural fibre affects its properties. The inconsistent performance and qualities of components made with natural fibres pose a significant challenge, limiting their use in engineering applications. By understanding the property variations within a single fibre, designers can select appropriate short fibres for the desired property. The current work aims to understand a fibre's heterogeneities and how they affect its mechanical characteristics. Coir fibre is categorised into three regions to address the property variation, from the root to the tail region. The morphological variations, chemical composition, and tensile behaviour of chopped fibres from each region were studied. The fibre diameter and internal porosity vary along the length of the fibre. The tail region's intact internal structure and lower porosity make it stronger than the other two regions. However, the modulus of the fibres extracted from the tail region is low. The fracture surface reveals the delamination of the cell walls and cellulose microfibril pull-out. The study highlights the need for fibre segregation based on the growth direction in composite part development.
AhmadFChoiHSParkMK. A review: natural fiber composites selection in view of mechanical, light weight, and economic properties. Macromol Mater Eng2015; 300: 10–24.
2.
KoronisGSilvaAFontulM. Green composites: a review of adequate materials for automotive applications. Compos B Eng2013; 44: 120–127.
3.
SariPSSpatenkaPJenikovaZ, et al.New type of thermoplastic bio composite: nature of the interface on the ultimate properties and water absorption. RSC Adv2015; 5: 97536–97546.
4.
RajHTripathiSBauriS, et al.Green composites using naturally occurring fibers: a comprehensive review. Sustainable Polymer & Energy2023; 1: 1–26.
5.
EsmeraldoMGomesAFreitasJ, et al.Dwarf-green coconut fibers: a versatile natural renewable bioresource. Treatment, morphology and physicochemical properties. Bioresources2010; 5: 2478–2501.
6.
KomuraiahAKumarNPrasadB. Chemical composition of natural fibers and its influence on their mechanical properties. Mech Compos Mater2014; 50: 359–376.
7.
SatyanarayanaKGPillaiCSukumaranK, et al.Structure property studies of fibres from various parts of the coconut tree. J Mater Sci1982; 17: 2453–2462.
8.
DefoirdtNBiswasSVrieseLD, et al.Assessment of the tensile properties of coir, bamboo and jute fibre. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2010; 41: 588–595.
9.
GassanJChateABledzkiAK. Calculation of elastic properties of natural fibers. J Mater Sci2001; 36: 3715–3720.
10.
ElfalehIAbbassiFHabibiM, et al.A comprehensive review of natural fibers and their composites: an eco-friendly alternative to conventional materials. Results in Engineering2023; 19: 101271.
11.
WangCBaiSYueX, et al.Relationship between chemical composition, crystallinity, orientation and tensile strength of kenaf fiber. Fibers Polym2016; 17: 1757–1764.
12.
Fortea-VerdejoMBumbarisEBurgstallerC, et al.Plant fibre-reinforced polymers: where do we stand in terms of tensile properties?Int Mater Rev2017; 62: 441–464.
13.
BadanayakPJoseSBoseG. Banana pseudostem fiber: a critical review on fiber extraction, characterization, and surface modification. J Nat Fibres2023; 20: 2168821.
14.
KoschevicMTDos SantosMDos Santos GarciaVA, et al.Influence of alkaline/hydrogen peroxide treatment on the properties of different natural cellulosic fibers. Fibers Polym2024; 25: 3683–3698.
15.
PuspaningrumTHarisYSaillahI, et al.Physical and mechanical properties of binderless medium density fiberboard (MDF) from coconut fiber. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science2020; 472: 012011.
16.
TranLQNMinhTNFuentesCA, et al.Investigation of microstructure and tensile properties of porous natural coir fibre for use in composite materials. Ind Crops Prod2015; 65: 437–445.
17.
MahmudMAbirNAnannyaFR, et al.Coir fiber as thermal insulator and its performance as reinforcing material in biocomposite production. Heliyon2023; 9.5: e15597.
18.
SeguraJMontavaIJuliáE, et al.Acoustic and thermal properties of panels made of fruit stones waste with coconut fibre. Constr Build Mater2024; 426: 136054.
19.
ManjuVVHegdeVNSomashekarR.Structural, morphological, mechanical, and electrical studies of N. nucifera fibres. Int J Biol Macromol2025; 290: 138905.
20.
ThomasonJLRudeiros-FernándezJL. Modelling the influence of fibre internal structure on the measured modulus of technical natural fibres. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2021; 147: 106478.
21.
MattrandCBéakouACharletK. Numerical modeling of the flax fiber morphology variability. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014; 63: 10–20.
22.
Syukran Alhelmy Seri BuanaMPasbaskhshPGohKL, et al.Elasticity, microstructure and thermal stability of foliage and fruit fibres from four tropical crops. Fibers Polym2013; 14: 623–629.
23.
RenDYuZLiW, et al.The effect of ages on the tensile mechanical properties of elementary fibers extracted from two sympodial bamboo species. Ind Crops Prod2014; 62: 94–99.
24.
BiswasSKindoSPatnaikA. Effect of fiber length on mechanical behavior of coir fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Fibers Polym2011; 12: 73–78.
25.
HussainMLevacherDLeblancN, et al.Analysis of physical and mechanical characteristics of tropical natural fibers for their use in civil engineering applications. J Nat Fibres2023; 20: 2164104.
26.
C1557 Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength and Young’s Modulus of Fibers. https://www.astm.org/c1557-20.html (accessed 27 May 2024).
27.
BaleyCBourmaudA. Average tensile properties of French elementary flax fibers. Mater Lett2014; 122: 159–161.
28.
BiswasSAhsanQCennaA, et al.Physical and mechanical properties of jute, bamboo and coir natural fiber. Fibers Polym2013; 14: 1762–1767.
29.
WangXLiYDengY, et al.Contributions of basic chemical components to the mechanical behavior of wood fiber cell walls as evaluated by nanoindentation. BioResources2016; 11: 6026–6039.
30.
El OudianiAMsahliSSakliF. In-depth study of agave fiber structure using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym2017; 164: 242–248.
31.
GanesanMNallathambiG. Alkali-treated coir fibre-pith composite for waste water treatment. J Ind Text2022; 51: 749S–768S.
32.
PlacetVCisséOLamine BoubakarM. Non-linear tensile behaviour of elementary hemp fibres. Part I: investigation of the possible origins using repeated progressive loading with in situ microscopic observations. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2014; 56: 319–327.
33.
El-HosseinyFPageDH. The mechanical properties of single wood pulp fibres: theories of strength. Fibre Science and Technology1975; 8: 21–31.
34.
DuvalABourmaudAAugierL, et al.Influence of the sampling area of the stem on the mechanical properties of hemp fibers. Mater Lett2011; 65: 797–800.
35.
KeckesJBurgertIFrühmannK, et al.Cell-wall recovery after irreversible deformation of wood. Nature Mater2003; 2: 810–813.
36.
AltanerCMJarvisMC. Modelling polymer interactions of the ‘molecular velcro’ type in wood under mechanical stress. J Theor Biol2008; 253: 434–445.
37.
Djafari PetroudySR. Physical and mechanical properties of natural fibers. In: Advanced high strength natural fibre composites in construction. Woodhead Publishing, 2017, pp.59–83.
38.
Gherardi HeinPRTarcísio LimaJ. Relationships between microfibril angle, modulus of elasticity and compressive strength in Eucalyptus wood. Maderas, Cienc Tecnol2012; 14: 267–274.
39.
ShoebMKandasamiRKSinghS, et al.Framework for treatment of coconut coir fibres through physico-chemical techniques. Int J of Geosynth and Ground Eng2024; 10: 19.
