Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025-8
Investigation of the impact fracture behavior of multi-walled carbon nanotube/epoxy nanocomposite adhesively bonded joints using an energy-based method
The fracture behavior of adhesive joints reinforced with varying weight percentages of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) was investigated under quasi-static and impact loads. A double cantilever beam specimen was used to analyze the opening-mode (mode-I) fracture behavior. The critical strain energy release rate was determined for the unfilled and MWCNT-filled adhesive joints using an energy-based method. The results showed that the incorporation of 0.3 wt% MWCNTs into the adhesive layer increased the fracture energy of the adhesive joint by 72% under quasi-static loading and 16.2% under impact loading, with corresponding increases in maximum force of 73.2% and 16% compared to the unfilled adhesive, respectively. Scanning electron microscope images of the fracture surfaces revealed nanofiller debonding and pull-out as the reinforcing mechanisms of MWCNTs. The fracture response of the specimens was simulated using a cohesive zone model and a bi-linear traction-separation law.
ValenteJCampilhoRMarquesE, et al.Geometrical optimization of adhesive joints under tensile impact loads using cohesive zone modelling. Int J Adhes Adhes2020; 97: 102492.
2.
SilvaMMarquesESilvaL. Behaviour under impact of mixed adhesive joints for the automotive industry. Lat Am J Solids Stru2016; 13: 835–853.
3.
ParkSWKimBCLeeDG. Tensile strength of joints bonded with a nano-particle-reinforced adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol2009; 23: 95–113.
4.
SoltanniaBTaheriF. Influence of nano-reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded single-lap joints subjected to static, quasi-static, and impact loading. J Adhes Sci Technol2015; 29: 424–442.
5.
HanumantharayaRSogaladIBasavarajappaS. Investigations on the influence of nano reinforcement on strength of adhesively bonded joints. Manuf Eng2021; 87: 935.
6.
OshimaSYoshimuraAHiranoY, et al.Experimental method for mode I fracture toughness of composite laminates using wedge loaded double cantilever beam specimens. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2018; 112: 119–125.
7.
YamagataYLuXSekiguchiY, et al.Experimental investigation of mode I fracture energy of adhesively bonded joints under impact loading conditions. Appl Adhes Sci2017; 5: 1–10.
8.
KhashabaUOthmanRNajjarI. Experimental analysis of composite scarf adhesive joints modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes under bending and thermomechanical impact loads. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2020; 234: 48–64.
9.
JiaZYuanGHuiD, et al.Effect of high loading rate and low temperature on mode I fracture toughness of ductile polyurethane adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol2019; 33: 79–92.
10.
JiaZYuanGFengX, et al.Shear properties of polyurethane ductile adhesive at low temperatures under high strain rate conditions. Compos B Eng2019; 156: 292–302.
11.
JiaZYuanGFengX, et al.Numerical study on the mechanical behavior of a polyurethane adhesive under high strain rate. Compos B Eng2019; 158: 131–140.
12.
JiaZFengXZouY. An investigation on mode II fracture toughness enhancement of epoxy adhesive using graphene nanoplatelets. Compos B Eng2018; 155: 452–456.
13.
BS EN ISO 527-2 1996 Plastics-Determination of tensile properties British Standard BSI, London.
14.
XuHZhangYPengR, et al.Simulation and experimental study on the strength of Al7075-T6 clinched joint. Eng Fail Anal2021; 129: 105735.
15.
ISO. Adhesives — Determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy of structural adhesives using double cantilever beam and tapered double cantilever beam specimens. BS ISO 25217:2009. London, UK: BSI British Standards.
16.
GhumatkarABudheSSekharR, et al.Influence of adherend surface roughness on the adhesive bond strength. Lat Am J Solids Stru2016; 13: 2356–2370.
17.
SafariAFarahaniMGhabeziP. Experimental study on the influences of different surface treatment processes and adhesive type on the aluminum adhesive-bonded joint strength. Mech Based Des Struct Mach2022; 50: 2400–2413.
18.
ASTM D2651-01. Standard guide for preparation of metal surfaces for adhesive bonding. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2001.
19.
KhoramishadHHamzenejadMAshoftehR. Characterizing cohesive zone model using a mixed-mode direct method. Eng Fract Mech2016; 153: 175–189.
20.
CarvalhoUCampilhoR. Application of the direct method for cohesive law estimation applied to the strength prediction of double-lap joints. Theor Appl Fract Mech2016; 85: 140–148.
21.
De MouraMGonçalvesJMagalhãesA. A straightforward method to obtain the cohesive laws of bonded joints under mode I loading. Int J Adhes Adhes2012; 39: 54–59.
22.
De MoraisAPereiraADe MouraM, et al.Bilinear approximations to the mixed-mode I–II delamination cohesive law using an inverse method. Compos Struct2015; 122: 361–366.
23.
De MouraMGonçalvesJChousalJ, et al.Cohesive and continuum mixed-mode damage models applied to the simulation of the mechanical behaviour of bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2008; 28: 419–426.
24.
De MouraMMoraisJDouradoN. A new data reduction scheme for mode I wood fracture characterization using the double cantilever beam test. Eng Fract Mech2008; 75: 3852–3865.
25.
WangYWilliamsJ. Corrections for mode II fracture toughness specimens of composites materials. Compos Sci Technol1992; 43: 251–256.
26.
ChavesFJDa SilvaLDe MouraM, et al.Fracture mechanics tests in adhesively bonded joints: a literature review. J Adhes2014; 90: 955–992.
27.
ZarifpourDKhoramishadHMarzbanradJ. Dynamic fracture response of adhesive joints subjected to mode-I impact wedge loading. J Adhes2024; 16: 1–18.
28.
BS BS. Determination of the mode I adhesive fracture energy GIC of structure adhesives using the double cantilever beam (DCB) and tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) specimens. London, Great Britain: British Standard Institution, 2001.
29.
ISO Standard. 10365: 2022. Adhesives—designation of main failure patterns. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2022.
30.
LiuQZhouXFanX, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of epoxy resin nanocomposites reinforced with graphene oxide. Polym-Plast Technol Eng2012; 51: 251–256.
