Epoxy adhesive joints are increasingly being used to bond structural components in automotive, marine, and aircraft bodies. However, poor fracture toughness energy and low resistance to crack growth in structural epoxy adhesives are important drawbacks of these adhesives. To overcome this challenge, this paper aims to investigate the influence of dispersing graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) into Axson-Sika Adekit A 140-1 structural epoxy adhesive on the fracture behavior of aluminum-to-glass fiber-reinforced polymer composite joints under mode-I and mode-II fracture tests. Double cantilever beam (DCB) and end-notched flexure specimens were fabricated to perform mode-I and mode-II fracture tests. For each specimen, three specimen groups including neat and graphene nanoplatelet reinforced with 0.05 wt.%, 0.1 wt.%, and 0.2 wt.% were considered. Results revealed that, for both of mode-I and mode-II tests, the optimum fracture toughness energy was obtained by inserting 0.1 wt.% of nanoparticles. By addition of 0.05 wt.% and 0.1 wt.% of GNPs, mode-I fracture toughness energy was improved by 90% and 115% compared with neat DCB specimens, while mode-II energy release rate increased by 55% and 83%, respectively. Finally, debonded surfaces were examined using optical microscope and scanning electron microscopy in order to find failure patterns and microstructural reinforcing mechanisms.
Hunter-AlarconRALeyrerJLealE, et al.Influence of dissimilar composite adherends on the mechanical adhesion of bonded joints for small blade wind turbine applications. Int J Adhes Adhes2018; 83: 178–183.
2.
AlderucciTBorsellinoCdi BellaG. Effect of surface pattern on strength of structural lightweight bonded joints for marine applications. Int J Adhes Adhes2022; 117: 103005.
3.
BaneaMDda SilvaLFMCarbasR, et al.Effect of material on the mechanical behaviour of adhesive joints for the automotive industry. J Adhes Sci Technol2017; 31: 663–676.
4.
SoleymaniMTahaniMZamaniP. On the influence of resin pocket area on the failure of tapered sandwich composites. Adv Struct Eng2021; 24: 42–51.
5.
QinZYangKWangJ, et al.The effects of geometrical dimensions on the failure of composite-to-composite adhesively bonded joints. J Adhes2021; 97: 1024–1051.
6.
de OliveiraLÁVieiraMMdos SantosJC, et al.An investigation on the mechanical behaviour of sandwich composite structures with circular honeycomb bamboo core. Discover Mech Eng2022; 1: 7.
7.
AghamohammadiHHosseini AbbandanakSNEslami-FarsaniR, et al.Effects of various aluminum surface treatments on the basalt fiber metal laminates interlaminar adhesion. Int J Adhes Adhes2018; 84: 184–193.
8.
ZamaniPJaamialahmadiAda SilvaLFM. Fatigue life evaluation of Al-GFRP bonded lap joints under four-point bending using strain-life criteria. Int J Adhes Adhes2023; 122: 103338.
9.
SousaJMCorreiaJRCabral-FonsecaS. Durability of an epoxy adhesive used in civil structural applications. Constr Build Mater2018; 161: 618–633.
10.
ZamaniPJaamialahmadiAda SilvaLFM, et al.An investigation on fatigue life evaluation and crack initiation of Al-GFRP bonded lap joints under four-point bending. Compos Struct2019; 229: 111433.
11.
Masoudi NejadRGhahremani MoghadamDHadiM, et al.An investigation on static and fatigue life evaluation of grooved adhesively bonded T-joints. Structures2022; 35: 340–349.
12.
SalehMNTomićNZMarinkovićA, et al.The effect of modified tannic acid (TA) eco-epoxy adhesives on mode I fracture toughness of bonded joints. Polym Test2021; 96: 107122.
13.
NajiMehrHShariatiMZamaniP, et al.Investigating on the influence of multi-walled carbon nanotube and graphene nanoplatelet additives on residual strength of bonded joints subjected to partial fatigue loading. J Appl Polym Sci2022; 139: 52069.
14.
SousaFCZamaniPAkhavan-SafarA, et al.A comprehensive review of the S-N fatigue behaviour of adhesive joints. J Adv Joining Processes2024; 9: 100178.
15.
GivANAyatollahiMRGhaffariSH, et al.Effect of reinforcements at different scales on mechanical properties of epoxy adhesives and adhesive joints: a review. J Adhes2018; 94: 1082–1121. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00218464.2018.1452736
16.
ZamaniPJaamialahmadiAda SilvaLFM. The influence of GNP and nano-silica additives on fatigue life and crack initiation phase of Al-GFRP bonded lap joints subjected to four-point bending. Compos B Eng2021; 207: 108589.
17.
ZamaniPda SilvaLFMMasoudi NejadR, et al.Experimental study on mixing ratio effect of hybrid graphene nanoplatelet/nano-silica reinforcement on the static and fatigue life of aluminum-to-GFRP bonded joints under four-point bending. Compos Struct2022; 300: 116108.
18.
NaatNBoutarYNaïmiS, et al.Effect of surface texture on the mechanical performance of bonded joints: a review. J Adhes2023; 99: 166–258.
19.
ZamaniPJaamialahmadiA. The effects of surface preparation and curing procedures on load carrying capacity and fatigue life of adhesively bonded lap joints. Iran J Manuf Eng2020; 7: 18–32.
20.
Khabaz-AghdamABehjatBMarquesEAS, et al.Effect of reduced graphene oxide on mechanical behavior of an epoxy adhesive in glassy and rubbery states. J Compos Mater2021; 55: 3839–3848.
21.
Mahesh, RawatPSaiL, et al.Shear performance of MWCNTs modified single-lap joints of glass/epoxy laminates. J Adhes Sci Technol2022; 36: 2418–2437.
22.
SoltanniaBTaheriF. Influence of nano-reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of adhesively bonded single-lap joints subjected to static, quasi-static, and impact loading. J Adhes Sci Technol2015; 29: 424–442.
23.
KorkmazYGültekinK. Improvement of structural, thermal and mechanical properties of epoxy composites and bonded joints exposed to water environment by incorporating boron nanoparticles. Int J Adhes Adhes2022; 116: 103141.
24.
BoroumandFSeyedkashiSMHPolMH. Experimental study of mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of metal–composite laminates reinforced with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Thin-Walled Struct2023; 183: 110377.
25.
ZamaniPAlaeiMHda SilvaLFM, et al.On the static and fatigue life of nano-reinforced Al-GFRP bonded joints under different dispersion treatments. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2022; 45: 1088–1110.
26.
AlmuhammadiKAlfanoMYangY, et al.Analysis of interlaminar fracture toughness and damage mechanisms in composite laminates reinforced with sprayed multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater Des2014; 53: 921–927.
27.
LadaniRBWuSKinlochAJ, et al.Multifunctional properties of epoxy nanocomposites reinforced by aligned nanoscale carbon. Mater Des2016; 94: 554–564.
28.
KhoramishadHZarifpourD. Fracture response of adhesive joints reinforced with aligned multi-walled carbon nanotubes using an external electric field. Theor Appl Fract Mech2018; 98: 220–229.
BorowskiESolimanEKandilUF, et al.Interlaminar fracture toughness of CFRP laminates incorporating multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Polymers (Basel)2015; 7: 1020–1045.
31.
PrasadVSekarKVargheseS, et al.Enhancing mode I and mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of flax fibre reinforced epoxy composites with nano TiO2. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 124: 105505.
32.
QuanDMurphyNIvankovicA. Fracture behaviour of epoxy adhesive joints modified with core-shell rubber nanoparticles. Eng Fract Mech2017; 182: 566–576.
33.
EkremMAvcıA. Effects of polyvinyl alcohol nanofiber mats on the adhesion strength and fracture toughness of epoxy adhesive joints. Compos B Eng2018; 138: 256–264.
34.
KanarBAkpinarSAvinc AkpinarI, et al.The fracture behaviour of nanostructure added adhesives under ambient temperature and thermal cyclic conditions. Theor Appl Fract Mech2018; 97: 120–130.
35.
JiaZFengXZouY. Graphene reinforced epoxy adhesive for fracture resistance. Compos B Eng2018; 155: 457–462.
36.
SrivastavaVKGriesTQuadfliegT, et al.Fracture behavior of adhesively bonded carbon fabric composite plates with nano materials filled polymer matrix under DCB, ENF and SLS tests. Eng Fract Mech2018; 202: 275–287.
37.
QuanDUrdánizJLRougeC, et al.The enhancement of adhesively-bonded aerospace-grade composite joints using steel fibres. Compos Struct2018; 198: 11–18.
38.
GheibiMRShojaeefardMHSaeidi GoogarchinH. Experimental and numerical analysis on the cohesive behavior of an automotive adhesive improved by MWCNT subjected to mode I and II loadings. Int J Mech Sci2019; 153–154: 271–286. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.009
39.
RavindranARLadaniRBWangCH, et al.Synergistic mode II delamination toughening of composites using multi-scale carbon-based reinforcements. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2019; 117: 103–115.
40.
DadianARahnamaSZolfaghariA. Experimental study of the CTBN effect on mechanical properties and mode I and II fracture toughness of a new epoxy resin. J Adhes Sci Technol2020; 34: 2389–2404.
41.
MinosiSCocchiDMaccaferriE, et al.Exploitation of rubbery electrospun nanofibrous mat for fracture toughness improvement of structural epoxy adhesive bonded joints. J Adv Joining Processes2021; 3: 100050.
42.
GuptaSKShuklaDKRavindraDK. Effect of nanoalumina in epoxy adhesive on lap shear strength and fracture toughness of aluminium joints. J Adhes2021; 97: 117–139.
43.
ÖzbekÖÇakırMV. MWCNT and nano-silica hybrids effect on mechanical and fracture characterization of single lap joints of GFRP plates. Int J Adhes Adhes2022; 117: 103159.
44.
RadshadHKhoramishadHNazariR. The synergistic effect of hybridizing and aligning graphene oxide nanoplatelets and multi-walled carbon nanotubes on mode-I fracture behavior of nanocomposite adhesive joints. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2022; 236: 1764–1776.
45.
Technical data sheet. ADEKIT A140-1 structural epoxy adhesive temporary technical data sheet. Axson, France.
46.
ASTM D638-14. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. 2022.
47.
ASTM D3039/D3039M-08. Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. 2014.
48.
ASTM D5528/D5528M-21. Standard Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. West Conshohocken, PA.
49.
ASTM D7905/D7905M-19e1. Standard Test Method for Determination of the Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. 2019.
50.
AroucheMMde FreitasSTde BarrosS. Evaluation of the strain-based partitioning method for mixed-mode I+II fracture of bi-material cracks. J Adhes2022; 98: 577–605.
51.
WangWLopes FernandesRTeixeira De FreitasS, et al.How pure mode I can be obtained in bi-material bonded DCB joints: a longitudinal strain-based criterion. Compos B Eng2018; 153: 137–148.
52.
MoazzamiMAyatollahiMRAkhavan-SafarA, et al.Effect of cyclic aging on mode I fracture energy of dissimilar metal/composite DCB adhesive joints. Eng Fract Mech2022; 271: 108675.
53.
SekiguchiYHoujouKShimamotoK, et al.Two-parameter analysis of fatigue crack growth behavior in structural acrylic adhesive joints. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2023; 46: 909–923.
54.
GhabeziPFarahaniMR. Experimental investigation of nanoparticles effects on cohesive model and bridging laws of mode I fracture in the adhesive joints. J Adhes Sci Technol2017; 31: 1807–1823.
55.
KhoshravanMAsgari MehrabadiF. Fracture analysis in adhesive composite material/aluminum joints under mode-I loading; experimental and numerical approaches. Int J Adhes Adhes2012; 39: 8–14.
56.
GhabeziPFarahaniM. Trapezoidal traction–separation laws in mode II fracture in nano-composite and nano-adhesive joints. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37: 780–794.
57.
de MouraMFSFCampilhoRDSGGonçalvesJPM. Pure mode II fracture characterization of composite bonded joints. Int J Solids Struct2009; 46: 1589–1595.
58.
WannapaNUthaisangsukV. Experimental and numerical failure analyses of dissimilar material joints between aluminium and thermoplastic. Compos Struct2020; 252: 112762.
59.
AdamosLTsokanasPLoutasT. An experimental study of the interfacial fracture behavior of Titanium/CFRP adhesive joints under mode I and mode II fatigue. Int J Fatigue2020; 136: 105586.
60.
WangJDingHJiangJ, et al.A calculation method for the mode II fracture energy release rate of dissimilar materials adhesively bonded structures. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2023; 46: 1704–1720.
61.
Akhavan-SafarASalamat-talabMAjdaniA, et al.Mode II fracture energy characterization of brittle adhesives using compliance calibration method. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2020; 43: 1928–1937.
62.
LiuBCaoSGaoN, et al.Thermosetting CFRP interlaminar toughening with multi-layers graphene and MWCNTs under mode I fracture. Compos Sci Technol2019; 183: 107829.
63.
Lopes FernandesRTeixeira de FreitasSBudzikMK, et al.Role of adherend material on the fracture of bi-material composite bonded joints. Compos Struct2020; 252: 112643.
64.
RazaviSMJSandnesLTorgersenJ, et al.The effect of fiber orientation on fracture response of metallic fiber-reinforced adhesive thin films. Theor Appl Mech Lett2018; 8: 43–47.
65.
ISO 10365. Adhesives Designation of main failure patterns. 2022.
66.
RazaviSMJAyatollahiMRNemati GivA, et al.Single lap joints bonded with structural adhesives reinforced with a mixture of silica nanoparticles and multi walled carbon nanotubes. Int J Adhes Adhes2018; 80: 76–86.
67.
ÇakırMV. The synergistic effect of hybrid nano-silica and GNP additives on the flexural strength and toughening mechanisms of adhesively bonded joints. Int J Adhes Adhes2023; 122: 103333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103333
68.
KhoramishadHAshoftehRSPourangH, et al.Experimental investigation of the influence of temperature on the reinforcing effect of graphene oxide nano-platelet on nanocomposite adhesively bonded joints. Theor Appl Fract Mech2018; 94: 95–100.
69.
KhoramishadHEbrahimijamalMFasihiM. The effect of graphene oxide nano-platelets on fracture behavior of adhesively bonded joints. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2017; 40: 1905–1916.
