This research is focused on the modeling of the deformation behavior of thin austenitic stainless steel sheets to consider size effect in microscale. First, the material with two different thicknesses is heat treated to obtain different grain sizes, and then they are characterized by the uniaxial tensile tests. The experimental results show that flow stress decreases with the reduction of the sheet thickness and the increase of the grain size. The decline of the flow stress curve is associated with the decrease of the strength coefficient and increase of the hardening exponent as the plastic deformation is scaled down to the microscale. To better model the behavior of the material in the microscale, a new constitutive model is proposed based on the Swift equation to take into account the geometry and grain size effect. This model is also defined in the finite element model of the uniaxial tensile test. It is found that the flow stress curve predicted by the proposed constitutive model shifts down by the decrease of the number of grains across the thickness, which are consistent with the experimental results. In addition, the finite element model with the proposed constitutive model predicts accurately the deformation load in the uniaxial tensile tests. It can be concluded that the proposed constitutive model can provide a good description of the flow stress by considering the interactive effect of specimen and grain sizes and can be used in the modeling of material behavior in microforming processes.
Geiger M, Kleiner M, Eckstein R, et al. Microforming. CIRP Ann2001; 50: 445–462.
2.
VollertsenFNiehoffHSHuZ. State of the art in micro forming. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2006; 46: 1172–1179.
3.
EtemadiEZamaniJAJafarzadehM. Physical constitutive equations for plastic deformation of FCC metals subjected to high strain rate loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2018; 232: 106–120.
4.
JiangZZhaoJXieH. Microforming technology: Theory, simulation and practice. NSW, Australia: University of Wollongong, 2017.
5.
AnoopA, Sekhar A, Kamaraj M, et al.Modelling the mechanical behaviour of heat-treated AISI 52100 bearing steel with retained austenite. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2018; 232: 44–57.
6.
OsmanH, Nor F, Hamdan Y, et al.Creep ruptures of AISI 347 austenitic stainless steel foils at elevated temperature of 750°C. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2017; 231: 516–522.
7.
HeckerS, Stout M, Staudhammer K, et al.Effects of strain state and strain rate on deformation-induced transformation in 304 stainless steel: Part I. Magnetic measurements and mechanical behavior. Metall Trans A1982; 13: 619–626.
8.
AngelT. Formation of martensite in austenitic stainless steels effects of deformation, temperature, and composition. J Iron Steel Inst1954; 177: 165–174.
9.
SabziHE, Zarei-Hanzaki A, Abedi H, et al.The sequential twinning-transformation induced plasticity effects in a thermomechanically processed high Mn austenitic steel. Mater Sci Eng: A2018; 725: 242–249.
10.
PaturiUMRNaralaSKR. Constitutive flow stress formulation for aeronautic aluminum alloy AA7075-T6 at elevated temperature and model validation using finite element simulation. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2016; 230: 994–1004.
11.
EngelUEcksteinR. Microforming—from basic research to its realization. J Mater Process Technol2002; 125: 35–44.
12.
LaiX, Peng L, Hu P, et al.Material behavior modelling in micro/meso-scale forming process with considering size/scale effects. Comput Mater Sci2008; 43: 1003–1009.
13.
FuMWChanWL. Micro-scaled products development via microforming, vol. 10. Birmingham: Springer, 2014.
14.
HallE. The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III discussion of results. Proc Phys Soc London Sect B1951; 64: 747.
15.
PetchN. The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J Iron Steel Inst1953; 174: 25–28.
16.
GeigerMVollertsenFKalsR. Fundamentals on the manufacturing of sheet metal microparts. CIRP Ann1996; 45: 277–282.
17.
LiuJFuMChanWL. A constitutive model for modeling of the deformation behavior in microforming with a consideration of grain boundary strengthening. Comput Mater Sci2012; 55: 85–94.
18.
HugEKellerC. Intrinsic effects due to the reduction of thickness on the mechanical behavior of nickel polycrystals. Metall Mater Trans A2010; 41: 2498–2506.
19.
KimHLeeY. Size dependence of flow stress and plastic behaviour in microforming of polycrystalline metallic materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2012; 226: 403–412.
20.
ChanWLFuMYangB. Experimental studies of the size effect affected microscale plastic deformation in micro upsetting process. Mater Sci Eng: A2012; 534: 374–383.
21.
PengL, Liu F, Ni J, et al.Size effects in thin sheet metal forming and its elastic–plastic constitutive model. Mater Des2007; 28: 1731–1736.
22.
PengL, Lai X, Lee HJ, et al.Analysis of micro/mesoscale sheet forming process with uniform size dependent material constitutive model. Mater Sci Eng: A2009; 526: 93–99.
23.
ChanWLFuMLuJ. The size effect on micro deformation behaviour in micro-scale plastic deformation. Mater Des2011; 32: 198–206.
24.
FangZ, Jiang Z, Wang X, et al.Grain size effect of thickness/average grain size on mechanical behaviour, fracture mechanism and constitutive model for phosphor bronze foil. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2015; 79: 1905–1914.
25.
RanJFuM. A hybrid model for analysis of ductile fracture in micro-scaled plastic deformation of multiphase alloys. Int J Plast2014; 61: 1–16.
26.
LiWFuMShiS-Q. Study of deformation and ductile fracture behaviors in micro-scale deformation using a combined surface layer and grain boundary strengthening model. Int J Mech Sci2017; 131: 924–937.
27.
WangC, Xue S, Chen G, et al.Constitutive model based on dislocation density and ductile fracture of Monel 400 thin sheet under tension. Met Mater Int2017; 23: 264–271.
28.
XuZ, Peng L, Yi P, et al.An investigation on the formability of sheet metals in the micro/meso scale hydroforming process. Int J Mech Sci2019; 150: 265–276.
29.
YunW, Peilong D, Zhenying X, et al.A constitutive model for thin sheet metal in micro-forming considering first order size effects. Mater Des2010; 31: 1010–1014.
30.
WangC, Wang H, Chen G, et al.New constitutive model for the size effect on flow stress based on the energy conservation law. Materials (Basel)2020; 13: 2617.
31.
WangS, Niu L, Chen C, et al.Size effects on the tensile properties and deformation mechanism of commercial pure titanium foils. Mater Sci Eng: A2018; 730: 244–261.
32.
407, A.E., Standard Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys, ASTM E 407-07, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2011. 2011.
33.
112, A.E., Standard Methods for Estimating the Average Grain Size, ASTM E 112-10, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. 2010.
34.
ArmstrongR, Codd I, Douthwaite R, et al.The plastic deformation of polycrystalline aggregates. Philos Mag: A J Theor Exp Appl Phys1962; 7: 45–58.
35.
MahabunphachaiSKoçM. Investigation of size effects on material behavior of thin sheet metals using hydraulic bulge testing at micro/meso-scales. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2008; 48: 1014–1029.
36.
ChanWLFuM. Studies of the interactive effect of specimen and grain sizes on the plastic deformation behavior in microforming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol2012; 62: 989–1000.
37.
JanbakhshMDjavanroodiFRiahiM. Utilization of bulge and uniaxial tensile tests for determination of flow stress curves of selected anisotropic alloys. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2013; 227: 38–51.
38.
MorrisonW. The effect of grain size on the stress-strain relationship in low-carbon steel. ASM Trans Quart1966; 59: 824–846.
39.
EinolghozatiMAssempourA. A micro mechanical study on tensile behavior of steel sheets with spheroidal cementite using crystal plasticity finite element method. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part L: J Mater: Des Appl2022; 236: 2357–2371.
