This paper deals with an investigation of the post-curing effect of halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) reinforced syntactic foam (HRSF) containing cenosphere as hollow inclusion at 0, 20, and 40 vol% in an epoxy matrix. Compression, flexural, and thermal properties of HRSF (1 vol% HNTs) and cenosphere/epoxy syntactic foam (CESF) composites without HNTs are studied under the influence of post-curing. Further, the post-cured HRSF containing 40 vol% cenosphere (NSF40_H) exhibited a compressive modulus of 33.2% higher than room temperature cured neat epoxy due to improved crosslinking. Addition of HNTs in NSF40_H augments the flexural modulus up to 26.9% compared to post-cured neat epoxy. Additionally, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of CESF composites with 40 vol% cenosphere was increased by 24.3 °C compared to the room temperature cured sample. This positive shift in Tg can be attributed to the beneficial impact of post-curing, as indicated by differential scanning calorimetry study. Thermogravimetric results demonstrated better thermal stability of HRSF relative to CESF and neat epoxy composites. Transmission electron microscopy illustrated the structure-property correlations of nanotube reinforcement. The improved properties of syntactic foams could be viewed as a potential material for lightweight constructions, especially in the marine and automobile industries.
BurdJTJMooreEAEzzatH, et al.Improvements in electric vehicle battery technology influence vehicle lightweighting and material substitution decisions. Appl Energy2021; 283: 116269.
2.
CliftonSThimmappaBHSSelvamR, et al.Polymer nanocomposites for high-velocity impact applications - A review. Compos Commun2020; 17: 72–86.
3.
SamsudinSSAriffZMZakariaZ, et al.Development and characterization of epoxy syntactic foam filled with epoxy hollow spheres. Express Polym Lett2011; 5: 653–660.
GuptaNWoldesenbetEMensahP. Compression properties of syntactic foams: effect of cenosphere radius ratio and specimen aspect ratio. Compos Part A2004; 35: 103–111.
6.
KaurMJayakumariLS. Consequence of cenosphere loading on hygrothermal, thermal, and mechanical properties of epoxy syntactic foams. J Cell Plast2019; 55: 297–318.
ShahapurkarKDoddamaniMMohan KumarGC, et al.Effect of cenosphere filler surface treatment on the erosion behavior of epoxy matrix syntactic foams. Polym Compos2019; 40: 2109–2118.
9.
LabellaMZeltmannSEShunmugasamyVC, et al.Mechanical and thermal properties of fly ash/vinyl ester syntactic foams. Fuel2014; 121: 240–249.
10.
RenSTaoXMaX, et al.Fabrication of fl y ash cenospheres-hollow glass microspheres / borosilicate glass composites for high temperature application. Ceram Int2018; 44: 1147–1155.
11.
GangwarSPathakVK. A critical review on tribological properties, thermal behavior, and different applications of industrial waste reinforcement for composites. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021; 235: 684–706.
12.
PatilBBharath KumarBRDoddamaniM. Compressive behavior of fly ash based 3D printed syntactic foam composite. Mater Lett2019; 254: 246–249.
13.
LvovYWangWZhangL, et al.Halloysite clay nanotubes for loading and sustained release of functional compounds. Adv Mater2016; 28: 1227–1250.
14.
DandoKRSalemDRThe effect of nano-additive reinforcements on thermoplastic microballoon epoxy syntactic foam mechanical properties. J Compos Mater2017; 52: 971–980.
15.
BaiSSunXWuM, et al.Effects of pure and intercalated halloysites on thermal properties of phthalonitrile resin nanocomposites. Polym Degrad Stab2020; 177: 109192.
16.
PrashanthaKLacrampeMFKrawczakP. Processing and characterization of halloysite nanotubes filled polypropylene nanocomposites based on a masterbatch route: effect of halloysites treatment on structural and mechanical properties. Express Polym Lett2011; 5: 295–307.
17.
DengSZhangJYeL. Halloysite-epoxy nanocomposites with improved particle dispersion through ball mill homogenisation and chemical treatments. Compos Sci Technol2009; 69: 2497–2505.
18.
SrivastavaSPandeyA. Mechanical behavior and thermal stability of ultrasonically synthesized halloysite-epoxy composite. Compos Commun2019; 11: 39–44.
19.
TangYDengSYeL, et al.Effects of unfolded and intercalated halloysites on mechanical properties of halloysite-epoxy nanocomposites. Compos Part A2011; 42: 345–354.
20.
DuMGuoBJiaD. Newly emerging applications of halloysite nanotubes: a review. Polym Int2010; 59: 574–582.
21.
RoojSDasAThakurV, et al.Preparation and properties of natural nanocomposites based on natural rubber and naturally occurring halloysite nanotubes. Mater Des2010; 31: 2151–2156.
22.
WangCLiuJDuH, et al.Effect of fly ash cenospheres on the microstructure and properties of silica-based composites. Ceram Int2012; 38: 4395–4400.
23.
SureshaBChandramohanGRaoPRS, et al.Friction and slide wear characteristics of glass-epoxy and glass-epoxy filled with SiCp composites. Indian J Eng Mater Sci2006; 13: 535–541.
24.
WoutersonEMBoeyFYCHuX, et al.Effect of fiber reinforcement on the tensile, fracture and thermal properties of syntactic foam. Polymer2007; 48: 3183–3191.
LiuHSuXTaoJ, et al.Effect of SiO 2 nanoparticles-decorated SCF on mechanical and tribological properties of cenosphere / SCF / PEEK composites. J Appl Polym Sci2019; 137: 1–10.
27.
BaoFWangJWangJ, et al.Static and impact responses of syntactic foam composites reinforced by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J Mater Res Technol2020; 9: 12391–12403.
28.
YuQZhaoYDongA, et al.Comparison of two different methods for producing hollow macrospheres with carbon fiber reinforced composite skin used in syntactic foams. Polym Compos2019; 40: E1075–E1083.
ChanLCNaéHNGillhamJK. Time-temperature–transformation (TTT) diagrams of high Tg epoxy systems: competition between cure and thermal degradation. J Appl Polym Sci1984; 29: 3307–3327.
31.
SharmaBChhibberRMehtaR. Effect of mixing parameters, postcuring, and stoichiometry on mechanical properties of fiber reinforced epoxy–clay nanocomposites. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2019; 233: 1363–1374.
32.
PattanaikAMukherjeeMMishraSB. Influence of curing condition on thermo-mechanical properties of fly ash reinforced epoxy composite. Compos B Eng2019; 176: 107301.
33.
VidilTTournilhacFMussoS, et al.Control of reactions and network structures of epoxy thermosets. Progr Polym Sci2016; 62: 126–179.
34.
KhanLAMahmoodAHKhanZ. Post curing effect of poly epoxy on visco-elastic and mechanical properties of different sandwich structures. Polym Compos2013; 34: 477–481.
35.
YuanJAnZZhangJ. Effects of hollow microsphere surface property on the mechanical performance of high strength syntactic foams. Compos Sci Technol2020; 199: 108309.
36.
WangXGillhamJK. TG–Temperature property (TgTP) diagram for thermosetting systems: anomalous behavior of physical properties vs. extent of cure. J Appl Polym Sci1993; 47: 425–446.
37.
GuzIAMenshykovaMKee PaikJ. Thick-walled composite tubes for offshore applications: an example of stress and failure analysis for filament-wound multi-layered pipes. Sh. Offshore Struct2017; 12: 304–322.
38.
BreunigPDamodaranVShahapurkarK, et al.Dynamic impact behavior of syntactic foam core sandwich composites. J Compos Mater2020; 54: 535–547.
39.
ASTM D792-13. Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of Plastics by Displacement 1. ASTM International, 2013.
40.
BakshiMSKattimaniS. Study of mechanical and dynamic mechanical behavior of halloysite nanotube-reinforced multiscale syntactic foam. J Appl Polym Sci2021; 138: 49855.
ZamaniPAlaeiMHda SilvaLF, et al.On the static and fatigue life of nano–reinforced Al–GFRP bonded joints under different dispersion treatments. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2022; 45: 1088–1110.
43.
GültekinKAkpinarSGürsesA, et al.The effects of graphene nanostructure reinforcement on the adhesive method and the graphene reinforcement ratio on the failure load in adhesively bonded joints. Compos B Eng2016; 98: 362–369.
44.
CañavateJColomXPagèsP, et al.Study of the curing process of an epoxy resin by FTIR spectroscopy. Polym Plast Technol Eng2000; 39: 937–943.
45.
NikolicGZlatkovicSCakicM, et al.Fast Fourier transform IR characterization of epoxy GY systems crosslinked with aliphatic and cycloaliphatic EH polyamine adducts. Sensors2010; 10: 684–696.
46.
SaifMJNaveedM. Effect of pristine halloysite nanotubes on dynamic mechanical and thermal behavior of reinforced epoxy nanocomposites. Iran Polym J2021; 31: 247–259.
47.
SathishkumarGKRajkumarGSrinivasanK, et al.Structural analysis and mechanical properties of lignite fly-ash-added jute–epoxy polymer matrix composite. J Reinf Plast Compos2018; 37: 90–104.
48.
YeasminFMallikAKChistyAH, et al.Remarkable enhancement of thermal stability of epoxy resin through the incorporation of mesoporous silica micro-filler. Heliyon2021; 7: e05959.
49.
PrashanthaKSchmittHLacrampeMF, et al.Mechanical behaviour and essential work of fracture of halloysite nanotubes filled polyamide 6 nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol2011; 71: 1859–1866.
DeanKKrstinaJTianW, et al.Effect of ultrasonic dispersion methods on thermal and mechanical properties of organoclay epoxy nanocomposites. Macromol Mater Eng2007; 292: 415–427.
52.
BunnPMottramJT. Manufacture and compression properties of syntactic foams. Composites1993; 24: 565–571.
53.
ZhangLMaJ. Effect of coupling agent on mechanical properties of hollow carbon microsphere/phenolic resin syntactic foam. Compos Sci Technol2010; 70: 1265–1271.
54.
MgbemenaCOLiDLinMF, et al.Accelerated microwave curing of fibre-reinforced thermoset polymer composites for structural applications: a review of scientific challenges. Compos Part A2018; 115: 88–103.
55.
JhaNBadkulAMondalDP, et al.Sliding wear behaviour of aluminum syntactic foam: a comparison with Al10 wt% SiC composites. Tribol Int2011; 44: 220–231.
56.
KandareEKandolaBKMylerP, et al.Thermo-mechanical responses of fiber-reinforced epoxy composites exposed to high temperature environments. Part I: experimental data acquisition. J Compos Mater2010; 44: 3093–3114.
57.
BirgerSMoshonovAKenigS. The effects of thermal and hygrothermal ageing on the failure mechanisms of graphite-fabric epoxy composites subjected to flexural loading. Composites1989; 20: 341–348.
58.
SchadlerLSGiannarisSCAjayanPM. Load transfer in carbon nanotube epoxy composites. Appl Phys Lett1998; 73: 3842–3844.
59.
NaraghiMFilleterTMoravskyA, et al.A multiscale study of high performance double-walled nanotube polymer fibers. ACS Nano2010; 4: 6463–6476.
60.
QianDDickeyEC. In-situ transmission electron microscopy studies of polymer-carbon nanotube composite deformation. J Microsc2001; 204: 39–45.
61.
ZamaniPJaamialahmadiAda SilvaLFM. The influence of GNP and nano-silica additives on fatigue life and crack initiation phase of Al-GFRP bonded lap joints subjected to four-point bending. Compos B Eng2020; 207: 108589.
62.
NajiMehrHMoghadamDGShariatiM, et al.Investigating on the influence of multi-walled carbon nanotube and graphene nanoplatelet additives on residual strength of bonded joints subjected to partial fatigue loading. J Appl Polym Sci2022; 139: 52069.
