The biomimetic approach rapidly evolves for designing novel lightweight structures and has been expanding in engineering design. Additive manufacturing or 3D printing permits three-dimensional parts to be fabricated with an intricacy and quality that might be tough or impossible to appreciate with the present traditional production techniques. With the probabilities and exactitude, 3D printing allows bio-inspired lattice structures from nature that are hypothetically advanced to ingest excellent energy absorption capacity with less material. The combination of additive manufacturing with cellular lattice architectures offers potential design options regarding material utilization, strength, cost, and component weight. A summary of recent advances in the improvement of bio-inspired structures is outlined in this review paper. Specifically, exciting highlights and remarkable mechanical properties of bio-inspired structures of bones, teeth, and dermal layers of creatures might be bio-mimicked to style economical energy absorbers. Researchers and engineers can use this information to create unique designs inspired biologically for the application of absorption energy.
SchmittO. Some interesting anduseful biomimetic transforms. In: Third international biophysics congress, Boston, MA, Aug. 29-Sept. 3, 1969, p. 297.
2.
BenyusJ. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature, 1st ed. William Morrow and Co., New York.
3.
WanieckKFayemiPEMaranzanaN, et al. Biomimetics and its tools. Bioinspired, Biomim Nanobiomaterials 2017; 6(2): 53–66.
4.
LehnJM and Benyus J. Bioinspiration and biomimicry in chemistry: reverse-engineering nature. John Wiley & Sons, 2012. Gerhard Swiegers (Editor), ISBN:978-1-118-31007-6, September 2012, 508 Pages.
HelmsMVattamSSGoelAK. Biologically inspired design: process and products. Des Stud2009; 30: 606–622.
7.
Rowland R. Biomimicry step-by-step. Bioinspired Biomimetic Nanobiomaterials 2017; 6: 102–112.
8.
VincentJFBogatyrevaOABogatyrev, et al.Biomimetics: its practice and theory. J Royal Soc Interf2020; 3(9): 471–482.
9.
FuKMorenoDYangM., et al. Bio-inspired design: an overview investigating open questions from the broader field of design-by-analogy. J Mech Des2014;136(11):111102.
10.
NagelJKSStoneRBMcAdamsDA. An Engineering-to-Biology Thesaurus for Engineering Design. Volume5: 22nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; Special Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28233
11.
GlierMWMcAdamsDALinseyJS. “Concepts in Biomimetic Design: Methods and Tools to Incorporate Into a Biomimetic Design Course.” Proceedings of the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 7: pp. 655–660https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2011-48571
12.
VattamS.WiltgenB.HelmsM.GoelA. K.YenJ. (2011). DANE: fostering creativity in and through biologically inspired design. In Design creativity 2010 (pp. 115–122). Springer, London.
13.
YimS.WilsonJ. O.RosenD. W.(2008, July). Development of an ontology for bio-inspired design using description logics. In International Conference on Product Lifecycle Management.
ZadpoorAA. Mechanical performance of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 2019;85:41–59.
16.
Evans AG, Hutchinson JW, Fleck NA, et al. The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals. Prog Mater Sci 2001; 46: 309–327.
17.
Zhang J, Chaisombat K, He S, et al. Hybrid composite laminates reinforced with glass/carbon woven fabrics for lightweight load-bearing structures. Mater Des 2012; 36: 75–80.
18.
Mines RAW, Tsopanos S, Shen Y, et al. Drop weight impact behavior of sandwich panels with metallic micro lattice cores. Int J Impact Eng 2013; 60: 120–132.
19.
Maxwell JCL. On the calculation of the equilibrium and stiffness of frames. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 1864; 27: 294-299.
20.
Deshpande VS, Ashby MF and Fleck NA. Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Mater 2001; 49: 1035-1040.
21.
HabibFNIovenittiPMasoodSH, et al.Fabrication of polymeric lattice structures for optimum energy absorption using multi jet fusion technology. Mater Des2018; 155: 86–98.
22.
GuoNLeuMC. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications, and research needs. Front Mech Eng2013; 8: 215–243.
23.
AremuAO, Brennan-Craddock JPJ, Panesar A, et al. Voxel-based method of constructing and skinning conformal and functionally graded lattice structures suitable for additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf2017; 13: 1–13.
24.
MahshidR, Hansen HN, and Højbjerre KL. Strength analysis, and modeling of cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting for tooling applications. Mater Des2016; 104: 276–283.
25.
BaiLZhangJ, Chen X, et al. Configuration optimization design of Ti6Al4V lattice structure formed by SLM. Materials (Basel)2018; 11: 1856.
26.
KumarA, Saurav Verma, and Jeng-Ywan Jeng. Supportless lattice structures for energy absorption fabricated by fused deposition modeling. 3D Print Addit Manuf 2020;7(2): 85–96.
27.
Brennan-CraddockJ, Brackett D, Wildman R, et al.The design of impact absorbing structures for additive manufacture. J Phys Conf Ser2012; 382: 012042.
28.
OwensADoSKurtzA, et al. Benefits of additive manufacturing for human exploration of Mars. The 45th International Conference on Environmental Systems was held in Bellevue, Washington, USAon 12 July 2015 through 16 July 2015. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/64526
29.
FangN, Xi D, Xu J, Ambati M, et al.Ultrasonic metamaterials with negative modulus. Nat Mater2006; 5(6): 452–456.
30.
ZargarianA, Esfahanian M, Kadkhodapour J, et al. On the fatigue behavior of additive manufactured lattice structures. Theor Appl Fract Mech2019; 100: 225e–2232.
31.
AhmadiSM, Campoli G, Yavari SA, et al.Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2014; 34: 106–115.
32.
BiciM, Brischetto S, Campana F, et al.Development of a multifunctional panel for aerospace use through SLM additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP2018; 67: 215–220.
33.
WegstUGBaiHSaizE, et al.Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater2015; 14: 23–36.
34.
YaoHBFangHYWangXH, et al.Cheminform abstract: hierarchical assembly of micro-/nano-building blocks: bioinspired rigid structural-functional materials. Chem Soc2011; 40: 3764–3785.
35.
NalewaySEPorterMMMckittrickJ, et al.Structural design elements in biological materials: application to bioinspiration. Adv Mater2015; 27: 5455–5476.
36.
MeyersMAChenPYLinYM, et al.Biological materials: structure and mechanical properties. Prog Mater Sci2008; 53: 1–206.
37.
ChenPYMckittrickJMeyersMA. Biological materials: functional adaptations and bioinspired designs. Prog Mater Sci2012; 57: 1492–1704.
38.
PeterFRichardW. Nature’s hierarchical materials. Prog Mater Sci2007; 52: 1263–1334.
YangCHuangHXLiK. Investigation of fiber orientation states in injection compression-molded short-fiber reinforced thermoplastics. Polym Compos2010; 31: 1899–1908.
41.
MoralesEWhiteJR. Effect of aging on the mechanical properties and the residual stress distribution of hybrid clay–glass fibre–polypropylene injection moldings. J Mater Sci2009; 44: 4734–4742
42.
AkayMBarkleyD. Fibre orientation and mechanical behavior in reinforced thermoplastic injection mouldings. J Mater Sci1991; 26: 2731–2742
43.
ChrysostomouAHashemiS. Mechanical properties of injection moulded styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) part II influence of short glass fibres and weldlines. J Mater Sci1998; 33: 4491–4501
44.
EstevezLKelarakisAGongQ, et al.Multifunctional graphene/platinum/nafion hybrids via ice templating. J Am Chem Soc2011; 133: 6122–6125.
45.
ScholzMSDrinkwaterBWTraskRS. Ultrasonic assembly of anisotropic short fiber-reinforced composites. Ultrasonics2014; 54: 1015–1019.
46.
BhatiaSKSharmaS. 3D-printed prosthetics roll off the presses. Chem Eng Prog2014; 110: 28–33.
47.
MurphySVAtalaA. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol2014; 32: 773–785.
48.
MelchelsFPWDomingosMANKleinTJ, et al.Additive manufacturing of tissues and organs. Prog Polym Sci2012; 37: 1079–1104.
49.
KingWEAndersonATFerenczRMLaser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing of metals, physics, computational, and materials challenges appl. Phys Rev2015; 2: 041304.
50.
SamesWJListFAPannalaS, et al.The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev2016; 61: 315–360.
51.
ZhangKZhouYXiaoC, et al. Application of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in tumor-associated bone segmental defect. Sci Adv. 2019;5(8):eaax6946.
52.
LewisJASmayJEStueckerJ, et al.Direct ink writing of three-dimensional ceramic structures. J Am Ceram Soc2006; 89: 3599–3609.
53.
SeitzHRiederWIrsenS, et al. Three-dimensional printing of porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering mater. Res B Appl Biomater2005; 74B: 782–788.
54.
HalloranJW. Ceramic stereolithography: additive manufacturing for ceramics by photopolymerization. Annu Rev Mater Res2016; 46: 19–40.
55.
MarchelliGPrabhakarRGanterM, et al.The guide to glass 3D printing: developments, methods, diagnostics, and results. Rapid Prototyp J2011; 17: 187–194.
WuCLuoYCunibertiG, et al.Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical and tough mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a controllable pore architecture, excellent mechanical strength, and mineralization ability. Acta Biomater2011; 7: 2644–2650.
58.
PetrickIJSimpsonTW. 3D Printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition res. Manag2013; 56: 12–16.
59.
AttaranM. The rise of 3-D printing: the advantages of additive manufacturing over traditional manufacturing. Bus Horiz2017; 60: 677–688.
60.
JoshiSCSheikhAA. 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual Phys Prototyp2015; 10: 175.
61.
HofmannM. 3D printing gets a boost and opportunities with polymer materials. ACS Macro Lett2014; 3: 382–386.
62.
StansburyJWIdacavageMJ. 3D printing with polymers: challenges among expanding options and opportunities.Dent Mater2016; 32: 54–64.
63.
LigonSCLiskaRStampflJ, et al.Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing chem. Rev2017; 117: 10212–10290.
64.
KokkinisDSchaffnerMStudartAR. Multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing of composite materials. Nat Commun2015; 6: 8643.
65.
BandyopadhyayAHeerB. Additive manufacturing of multi-material structures. Mater Sci Eng R Rep2018; 129: 1–16.
66.
GrafeDWickbergAZiegerMM, et al.Adding chemically selective subtraction to multi-material 3D additive manufacturing. Nat Commun2018; 9: 2788.
67.
BermanB. 3-D printing: the new industrial revolution.Bus Horiz2012; 55: 155–162.
68.
de BeerNDimitrovDSchreveK,et al.Investigating the achievable accuracy of three-dimensional printing. Rapid Prototyp. J2006; 12: 42–52.
69.
GulJZSajidMRehmanMM,et al.3D Printing for soft robotics – a review. Sci Technol Adv Mater2018; 19: 243–262.
70.
BartlettNWTolleyMTOverveldeJTB, et al. A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion. Science2015; 349: 161–165.
71.
ZhangFWeiMViswanathanVV,et al.3D printing technologies for electrochemical energy storage. Nano Energy2017; 40: 418–431.
72.
McMenaminPGQuayleMR, et al.The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ2014; 7: 479–486.
73.
GodoiFCPrakashSBhandariBR. 3d Printing technologies applied for food design: status and prospects. J Food Eng2016; 179: 44–54.
74.
GrossBLockwoodSYSpenceDM. Recent advances in analytical chemistry by 3D printing. Anal Chem2017; 89: 57–70.
75.
JohnsonRD. Chemical creativity with 3D printing. Nat Chem2012; 4: 338–339.
76.
NormanJMaduraweRDMooreCMV, et al.A new chapter in pharmaceutical manufacturing: 3D-printed drug products. Adv Drug Deliv Rev2017; 108: 39–50.
77.
TrenfieldSJAwadAGoyanesA, et al. 3D printing pharmaceuticals: drug development to frontline care. Trends Pharmacol Sci2018; 39: 440–451.
78.
LermanMJLembongJGillenG, et al.3D printing in cell culture systems and medical applications. Appl Phys Rev2018; 5: 041109.
79.
GhoshUNingSWangY, et al.Addressing unmet clinical needs with 3D printing technologies. Adv Healthc Mater2018; 7: 1800417.
80.
SarobolPCookAClemPG, et al.Additive manufacturing of hybrid circuits. Annu Rev Mater Res2016; 46: 41–62.
81.
LiJTangWWangQ,et al.Solution-processable organic and hybrid gate dielectrics for printed electronics. Mater Sci Eng R Rep2018; 127: 1–36.
82.
ChiaHNWuBM. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng2015; 9: 4.
83.
ChimeneDLennoxKKKaunasRR, et al.Advanced bio inks for 3D printing: a materials science perspective. Ann Biomed Eng2016; 44: 2090–2102.
84.
GibsonI.RosenD.StuckerB., 2015. Introduction and basic principles. In: GibsonI.RosenD.StuckerB., eds. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. New York, NY: Springer, Edition Number-2 Number of Pages-498.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3.
85.
ZhouL-YFuJ, et al. A review of 3D printing technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater2020; 30: 2000187
86.
TrubyRLLewisJA. Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature2016; 540: 371−378.
87.
MaxwellJC. Statique expérimentale et théorique des liquides soumis aux seules forces moléculaires. Nature1874; 10: 119–121.
88.
NorbergUMRaynerJM. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Biol Sci1987; 316: 335–427.
89.
DuigouALRequileSBeaugrandJ, et al.Natural fibres actuators for smart bio-inspired hydromorph biocomposites. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(12). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-665X/aa9410
90.
DuYGuDXiL, et al.Laser additive manufacturing of bio-inspired lattice structure: forming quality, microstructure, and energy absorption behavior. Mater Sci Eng A2020; 773: 138857.
91.
EssassiKRebiereJ-LEl MahiA, et al. Experimental and analytical investigation of the bending behavior of 3D-printed bio-based sandwich structures composites with auxetic core under cyclic fatigue tests. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2020; 131: 105775.
92.
ZhuHLiD-SHanW-F, et al.Experimental and numerical study of in-plane compressive properties and failure of 3D six-directional braided composites with large braiding angle. Mater Des2020; 195: 108917.
93.
HammetterCIRinaldiRGZokFW. Pyramidal lattice structures for high strength and energy absorption. J Appl Mech2013; 80: 041015.
94.
EvansAGHeMDeshpandeVS, et al.Concepts for enhanced energy absorption using hollow micro-lattices. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37: 947–959.
95.
ChuJEngelbrechtSGrafG, et al.A comparison of synthesis methods for cellular structures with application to additive manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J2010; 16: 275–283.
96.
AjdariANayeb-HashemiHVaziriA. Dynamic crushing, and energy absorption of regular, irregular, and functionally graded cellular structures. Int J Solids Struct2011; 48: 506–516.
97.
FleckNDeshpandeVAshbyM. Micro-architectured materials: past, present, and future. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci2010; 466: 2495–2516.
98.
RosenDW. Computer-aided design for additive manufacturing of cellular structures. Comput Aided Des Applic2007; 4: 585–594.
99.
MezaLRGreerJR. Mechanical characterization of hollow ceramic nanolattices. J Mater Sci2014; 49: 2496–2508.
100.
MontemayorLGreerJ. Mechanical response of hollow metallic nanolattices: combining structural and material size effects. J Appl Mech2015; 82: 071012.
101.
SurjadiJUGaoLCaoK, et al.Mechanical enhancement of core-shell micro lattices through high-entropy alloy coating. Sci Rep2018; 8: 5442.
102.
MuellerJRaneyJRKochmannDM, et al.Stiffness-independent toughening of beams through coaxial interfaces. Adv Sci2018; 1800728.
103.
RosenD. W. (2014). What are Principles for Design for Additive Manufacturing?. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Progress in Additive Manufacturing May 2014, (Pro-AM 2014), 85–90.https://doi.org/10.3850/978-981-09-0446-3_027.
104.
ItuarteFChekurovSTuomiJ, et al.Digital manufacturing applicability of a laser sintered component for the automotive industry: a case study. Rapid Prototyp J2018; 24(7): 1203–1211.
105.
BallardiniRMFlores ItuarteIPeiE. Printing spare parts through additive manufacturing: legal and digital business challenges. J Manuf Technol Manag2018; 29: 958–982
106.
RuffoMTuckCHagueR. Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing-laser sintering production for low to medium volumes. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf2006; 220: 1417–1427.
107.
VayreBVignatFVilleneuveF. Designing for additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP2012; 3: 632–637
Kumar A, Collini L, Ursini C, et al.Energy Absorption and Stiffness of Thin and Thick-Walled Closed-Cell 3D-Printed Structures Fabricated from a Hyperelastic Soft Polymer. Materials2022, 15, 2441. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15072441.
110.
GaynorATGuestJK. Topology optimization considering overhang constraints: eliminating sacrificial support material in additive manufacturing through design. Struct Multidiscipl Optim2016; 54: 1157–1172.
111.
ZhangQYangXLiP, et al.Bioinspired engineering of honeycomb structure – using nature to inspire human innovation. Prog Mater Sci2015; 74: 332–400
112.
BeyerCFigueroaD. Design and analysis of lattice structures for additive manufacturing. Manuf Sci Eng2016; 138: 121014
113.
GibsonL.J.AshbyM.F. (1997) Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
114.
BhateDPenickCAFerryLA, et al.Classification and selection of cellular materials in mechanical design: engineering and biomimetic approaches. Designs2019; 3: 19
115.
BriguietGEganPF. “Structure, Process, and Material Influences for 3D Printed Lattices Designed With Mixed Unit Cells.” Proceedings of the ASME2020International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 11A: 46th Design Automation Conference (DAC). Virtual, Online. August 17–19, 2020. V11AT11A033. ASME.https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2020-22575.
116.
LiuCDuZZhangW, et al.Additive manufacturing-oriented design of graded lattice structures through explicit topology optimization. J Appl Mech2017; 84(8), 081008.
117.
WangXXuSZhouS, et al.Topological design and additive manufacturing of porous metals for bone scaffolds and orthopedic implants: a review. Biomaterials2016; 83: 127–141.
118.
EganPFGonellaVCEngenspergerM,et al.Computationally designed lattices with tuned properties for tissue engineering using 3D printing. PloS ONE2017; 12(8):e0182902.
119.
LingCCernicchiAGilchristMD, et al.Mechanical behavior of additively-manufactured polymeric octet-truss lattice structures under quasi-static and dynamic compressive loading. Mater Des2019; 162: 106–118.
120.
LouJMaLWuLZ. Free vibration analysis of simply supported sandwich beams with lattice truss core. Mater Sci Eng B Solid-State Mater Adv Technol2012; 177: 1712–1716.
121.
SchaedlerTARoCJSorensenAE, et al.Designing metallic micro lattices for energy absorber applications. Adv Eng Mater2014; 16: 276–283.
122.
GibsonLJ. Modelling the mechanical behavior of cellular materials. Mater Sci Eng A1989; 110: 1–36.
123.
GibsonLJAshbyMF. Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
124.
OzdemirZHernandez-NavaETyasA, et al.Energy absorption in lattice structures in dynamics: experiments. Int J Impact Eng2016; 89: 49–61.
125.
XuMQiuZ. Free vibration analysis and optimization of composite lattice truss core sandwich beams with interval parameters. Compos Struct2013; 106: 85–95.
126.
YinSWuLYangJ, et al.Damping and low-velocity impact behavior of filled composite pyramidal lattice structures. J Compos Mater2014; 48: 1789–1800.
127.
HornTJHarryssonOLA. Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Sci Prog2012; 95: 255–282.
128.
VasilievVVRazinAF. Anisogrid composite lattice structures for spacecraft and aircraft applications. Compos Struct2006; 76: 182–189.
129.
BaryninVABunakovVARasinAF, et al. Aerospace composite lattice structures. In: Proceedings of the 120th international conference on composite materials, Paris, France, 5–9 July 1999.
130.
MoonSKTanYEHwangJ, et al.Application of 3D printing technology for designing lightweight unmanned aerial vehicle wing structures. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Technol2014; 1: 223–228.
131.
MaloneyKFinkKDSchaedlerTA,et al.Multifunctional heat exchangers derived from three-dimensional micro-lattice structures. Int J Heat Mass Trans2012; 55: 2486–2493.
132.
WadleyHNGQueheillaltDT. Thermal applications of cellular lattice structures. Mater Sci Forum2007; 539: 242–247.
133.
GorguluarslanRMChoiSKSaldanaCJ. Uncertainty quantification and validation of 3D lattice scaffolds for computer-aided biomedical applications. J Mech Behav Biomed2017; 71: 428–440.
134.
JettéBBrailovskiVDumasM, et al.Femoral stem incorporating a diamond cubic lattice structure: design, manufacture, and testing. J Mech Behav Biomed2018; 77: 58–72.
135.
ChenWMLeeSJLeePVS. Failure analysis of an additive manufactured porous titanium structure for orthopedic implant applications. Mater Sci Forum2016; 863: 45–49.
136.
SignettiSPugnoNM. Evidence of optimal interfaces in bio-inspired ceramic composite panels for superior ballistic protection. J Eur Ceram Soc2014; 34:2823−2831.
137.
JohnsonAABinghamGAMajewskiCE. The design and assessment of bio-inspired additive manufactured stab-resistant armor. Virtual Phys Prototyp2018; 13:49−57.
138.
YangWGludovatzBZimmermannEA, et al. Structure and fracture resistance of alligator gar (atractosteus spatula) armored fish scales. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 5876–5889.
139.
MirandaPPajaresAMeyersMA. Bioinspired composite segmented armor: numerical simulations. J Mater Res Technol2019; 8: 1274−1278.
140.
ZhuBDOrtegaCFMotamediR, et al. Structure and mechanical performance of a ‘‘modern’’ fish scale. Adv Eng Mater 2012; 14: B185-B194.
141.
AllisonPGChandlerMQRodriguezR, et al.Mechanical properties and structure of the biological multilayered material system, atractosteus spatula scales. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 5289–5296.
142.
RudykhSOrtizCBoyceMC. Flexibility and protection by design: imbricated hybrid microstructures of bio-inspired armor. Soft Matter2015; 11: 2547−2554.
143.
MalikIAMirkhalafMBarthelatF. Bio-inspired “jigsaw”-like interlocking sutures: modeling, optimization, 3D printing and testing. J Mech Phys Solids2017; 102: 224–238.
MirkhalafMSunesaraAAshrafiB, et al.Toughness by segmentation: fabrication, testing, and micromechanics of arolina are ceramic panels for impact applications. Int J Solids Struct2019; 158: 52–65.
146.
MirkhalafMZhouTBarthelatF. Simultaneous improvements of strength and toughness in topologically interlocked ceramics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2018; 115: 9128.
147.
MirkhalafMTanguayJBarthelatF. Carving 3D architectures within glass: exploring new strategies to transform the mechanics and performance of materials. Extreme Mech Lett2016; 7: 104–113.
148.
PorterMM,RavikumarNBarthelatF,et al.3D printing and mechanics of bio-inspired articulated and multi-material structures. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2017; 73: 114–126.
149.
MirkhalafMDastjerdiAKBarthelatF. Overcoming the brittleness of glass through bio-inspiration and micro-architecture. Nat Commun2014; 5: 3166.
150.
YinZDastjerdiABarthelatF. Tough and deformable glasses with bioinspired cross-ply architectures. Acta Biomater 2018;75:439-450.
151.
SunY-YYuZ-W andWangZ-G. Bioinspired design of building materials for blast and ballistic protection. Adv Civil Eng2016; 2016: 6.
152.
DjumasLMolotnikovASimonGP, et al. Enhanced mechanical performance of bio-inspired hybrid structures utilising topological interlocking geometry. Sci Rep2016; 6: 26706.
153.
DjumasLSimonGPEstrinY, et al.Deformation mechanics of non-planar topologically interlocked assemblies with structural hierarchy and varying geometry. Sci Rep2017; 7: 11844.
154.
YaoHDaoMImholtT, et al. Protection mechanisms of the iron-plated armor of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent gastropod. Proc Natl Acad Sci2010; 107: 987–992.
155.
AbirMRTayTELeeHP. On the improved ballistic performance of bio-inspired composites. Compos A2019; 123: 59–70.
156.
RheeHHorstemeyerMFHwangY, et al. A study on the structure and mechanical behavior of the terrapene arolina carapace: a pathway to design bio-inspired synthetic composites. Mater Sci Eng C2009; 29: 2333–2339.
157.
MoranoC, et al. Analysis of crack trapping in (3D, printed bio-inspired structural interfaces. Procedia Struct Integr2018; 12: 561–566.
158.
AlfanoMMoranoCBrunoL, et al. Analysis of debonding in bio-inspired interfaces obtained by additive manufacturing. Procedia Struct Integr2018; 8: 604–609.
159.
HuiC-YLongRKathrynJ, et al. Barnacles resist removal by crack trapping. J R Soc Interface2011; 8: 868–879.
160.
TasdemirciAAkbulutEFGuzelE, et al.Crushing behavior and energy absorption performance of a bio-inspired metallic structure: experimental and numerical study. Thin-Walled Struct2018; 131: 547–555.
161.
ZhangLBaiZBaiF. Crashworthiness design for bio-inspired multi-cell tubes with quadrilateral, hexagonal and octagonal sections. Thin-Walled Struct2018; 122: 42–51.
162.
YuXPanLChenJ, et al. Experimental and numerical study on the energy absorption abilities of trabecular–honeycomb biomimetic structures inspired by beetle elytra. J Mater Sci 2019; 54(3).
163.
ChenJXWuG. Beetle forewings: epitome of the optimal design for lightweight composite materials. Carbohyd Polym2013; 91: 659–665.
164.
ChenJXZuQWuG, et al.Review of beetle forewing structures and their biomimetic applications in China: (II) on the three-dimensional structure, modeling, and imitation. Mater Sci Eng C2015; 55: 620–633.
165.
ChengLThomasAGlanceyJL, et al. Mechanical behavior of bio-inspired laminated composites. Compos A2011; 42: 211–220.
166.
XiangJDuJLiD, et al.Numerical analysis of the impact resistance in aluminum alloy bi-tubular thin-walled structures designs inspired by beetle elytra. J Mater Sci2017; 52: 13247−13260.
KashaniMHAlavijehHSAkbarshahiH, et al.Bitubular square tubes with different arrangements under quasi-static axial compression loading. Mater Des2013; 51: 1095–1103.
169.
RahiA. Controlling energy absorption capacity of combined bi tubular tubes under axial loading. Thin-Walled Struct2018; 123: 222–231.
170.
AhmedNXuePZafarN. Dynamic axial crushing of bi tubular tubes with curvy polygonal inner-tube sections. Int J Comput Mater Sci Eng2017; 06: 1750024.
171.
AzimiMBAsgariM. A new bi-tubular conical–circular structure for improving crushing behavior under axial and oblique impacts. Int J Mech Sci2016; 105: 253–265.
172.
DongH-pGaoG-jXieS-c, et al. Collision performance of bi tubular tubes with diaphragms. Journal of Central South University2015; 22: 3657−3665.
173.
KamranMXuePAhmedN,et al.Axial crushing of uni-sectional bi-tubular inner tubes with multiple outer cross-sections. Latin Amer J Solids Struct2017; 14: 2198−2220.
174.
GrunenfelderLKSuksangpanyaNSalinasC, et al. Optimization of bio-inspired bi-directionally. Acta Biomater2014; 10: 3997–4008.
175.
WeaverJCMillironGWMiserezA, et al.The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer. Science2012; 336: 1275−1278.
176.
AminiSTadayonMIdapalapatiS, et al.The role of quasi-plasticity in the extreme contact damage tolerance of the stomatopod dactyl club. Nat Mater2015; 14: 943.
177.
RenLZhouXLiuQ, et al.3D magnetic printing of bio-inspired composites with tunable mechanical properties. J Mater Sci2018; 53: 14274–14286.
178.
FernandesMCAizenbergJWeaverJC, et al.Mechanically robust lattices inspired by deep-sea glass sponges. Nat. Mater2021; 20: 237–241
179.
DeLucaD. The power of the biomimicry design spiral. Biomimicry Institute, 2016.
180.
SpeckTSpeckOBeheshtiN,et al.Process sequences in biomimetic research. Design and Nature IV2008; 114: 3–11.
181.
YangXMaJShiY, et al. Crashworthiness investigation of the bio-inspired bi-directionally corrugated core sandwich panel under quasi-static crushing load. Mater Des2017; 135: 275–290.
182.
YaraghiNAGuarı´n-ZapataNGrunenfelderLK, et al. A sinusoidally architected helicoidal biocomposite. Adv Mater2016; 28: 6835–6844.
183.
YangaJGuaDLinaK, et al. Optimization of bio-inspired bi-directionally corrugated panel impact resistance structures: numerical simulation and selective laser melting process. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019; 91: 59–67.
184.
ArjangpayADarvizehATooskiMY. Effects of structural characteristics of a bionic dragonfly wing on its low-velocity impact resistance. J Bionic Eng2018; 15: 859−871.
185.
ZhouPKongXQWuCW, et al. The novel mechanical property of tongue of a woodpecker. J Bionic Eng2009; 6: 214–218.
186.
SekiYSchneiderMSMeyersMA. Structure and mechanical behavior of a toucan beak. Acta Mater2005; 53: 5281–5296.
187.
LauneyMEChenP-Y, et al. Mechanistic aspects of the fracture toughness of elk antler bone. Acta Biomater2010; 6: 1505–1514.
188.
ZhangYHuangWHayashiC, et al.Microstructure and mechanical properties of different keratinous horns. J R Soc Interface 2018; 15(143): 20180093.
189.
HuangJDurdenHChowdhuryM. Bio-inspired armor protective material systems for ballistic shock mitigation. Mater Des2011; 32 : 3702−3710.
190.
BertramJEA and MJ. Gosline fracture toughness design in horse hoof keratin. J Exp Biol1986; 125: 29–47.
191.
MaQChengHJangK-I, et al.A nonlinear mechanics model of bio-inspired hierarchical lattice materials consisting of horseshoe microstructures. J Mech Phys Solids 2016; 90: 179–202.
192.
ZhengBLiuYLiuJ, et al.Novel mechanical behaviors of DNA-inspired helical structures with chirality. Int J Mech Sci2019; 161–162: 105025.
193.
Hamzehei1RZolfagharianADariushiS, et al. 3D-printed bio-inspired zero Poisson's ratio graded metamaterials with high energy absorption performance. Smart Mater Struct 2022; 31(3): 035001.
194.
DongJZhangH, et al. 3D printed bio-inspired sealing disc of pipeline inspection gauges (PIGs) in small diameter pipeline. J Nat Gas Sci Eng2019; 61: 344–356.
195.
WangHGuDLinK, et al.Compressive properties of bio-inspired reticulated shell structures processed by selective Laser melting. Adv Eng Mater2019; 21: 1801168.
196.
SoltaniANorooziRBodaghiM, et al.3D printing on-water sports boards with bio-inspired core designs. 2020; 12: 250.
197.
Nguyen-VanVTranPPengC, et al. Bioinspired cellular cementitious structures for prefabricated construction: hybrid design & performance evaluations. Autom Constr2020; 119: 103324.
198.
ChintapalliRKMirkhalafMDastjerdiAK, et al.Fabrication, testing and modeling of a new flexible armor inspired from natural fish scales and osteoderms. Bioinspir Biomim2014; 9: 036005.
199.
ShaYJiangLHaoyuC, et al.Design and strengthening mechanisms in hierarchical architected materials processed using additive manufacturing. Int J Mech Sci2018; 149: 150–163.
200.
YinSChenHLiJ, et al.Effects of architecture level on mechanical properties of hierarchical lattice materials. Int J Mech Sci2019; 157–158: 282−289.
201.
AudibertCChaves-JacobJLinaresJ-M, et al.Bio-inspired method based on bone architecture to optimize the structure of mechanical workspieces, Mater Des 2018; 160: 708–717.
202.
BateSRGFarrowIRTraskRS. 3D printed polyurethane honeycombs for repeated tailored energy absorption. Mater Des2016; 15: 172−183.
203.
De PasqualeGLuceriF. Experimental validation of Ti6Al4V bio-inspired cellular structures from additive manufacturing processes. Mater Today Proc2019; 7: 566–571.
204.
NajmonJDeHartJWoodZ, et al. Cellular helmet liner design through bio-inspired structures and topology optimization of compliant mechanism lattices. SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety2018; 6(3): 217–235.
205.
PorterMMNovitskayaECastro-CeseñaAB, et al.Highly deformable bones: unusual deformation mechanisms of seahorse armor. Acta Biomater2013; 9: 6763−6767.
206.
PorterMMAdriaensDHattonRL,et al.BIOMECHANICS. Why the seahorse tail is square. Science2015; 349: aaa6683.
207.
du PlessisABroeckhovenCYadroitsevI, et al.Analyzing nature’s protective design: the glyptodont body armor. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater2018; 82: 218–223.
208.
ChenZWangZZhouS, et al.Novel negative Poisson’s ratio lattice structures with enhanced stiffness and energy absorption capacity. Materials (Basel)2018; 11: 1095.
209.
MizziLMahdiEMTitovK, et al.Mechanical metamaterials with star-shaped pores exhibiting negative and zero Poisson’s ratio. Mater Des2018; 146: 28−37.
210.
ChenYand FuM-H. A novel three-dimensional auxetic lattice meta-material with enhanced stiffness. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26: 105029.
211.
YangLHarryssonOWestH, et al. Compressive properties of ti–6Al–4 V auxetic mesh structures made by electron beam melting. Acta Mater2012; 60: 3370−3379.
212.
RenXShenJGhaedizadehA, et al.Experiments and parametric studies on 3D metallic auxetic metamaterials with tuneable mechanical properties. Smart Mater Struct2015; 24: 095016.
213.
SeungCHKangDSKangK. Two nature-mimicking auxetic materials with potential for high energy absorption. Mater Today2019; 26: 30–39.
214.
MazaevAVAjenezaOShitikovaMV. Auxetics materials: classification, mechanical properties, and applications. Mater Sci Eng2020; 747: 012008.
215.
GhazlanANgoTNguyenT, et al.Uncovering a high-performance bio-mimetic cellular structure from the trabecular bone. Sci Rep2020; 10: 14247
216.
BrooksWK. Report on the scientific results of the exploring voyage of the H.M.S. Edinburgh: Neill and Co.,1886.
217.
SpeckOSpeckDHornR, et al.Biomimetic bio-inspired is biomorph sustainable? An attempt to classify and clarify biology-derived technical developments. Bioinspir Biomim2017; 12: 011004.
218.
FayemiPEMaranzanaNAoussatA, et al.Bio-inspired design characterization and its links with problem-solving tools. In: Proc Int Des Conf Des (editors: MarjanovićDŠtorgaMPavkovićN, et al.), Glasgow, UK, 2014 January, pp.173–182.INTERNATIONAL DESIGN CONFERENCE - DESIGN 2014 Dubrovnik - Croatia, May 19 - 22, 2014
219.
LenauTAMetzeA-LHesselbergT. Paradigms for biologically inspired design. Proc. SPIE 10593, Bioinspiration, Biomimetics, and Bioreplication VIII, 1059302 (27 March 2018); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2296560
220.
WangPSunYShiX, et al.3D Printing of tissue engineering scaffolds: a focus on vascular regeneration. Bio-des. Manuf2021; 4: 344–378
221.
WangPSunYShiX, et al. Bioscaffolds embedded with regulatory modules for cell growth and tissue formation: a review. Bioactive Materials2021; 61283−1307.
222.
JiYLuanCYaoX, et al. Recent progress in 3D printing of smart structures: classification, challenges, and trends. Adv Intell Syst2021; 3: 2000271. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202000271
223.
GeQSakhaeiALeeH, et al. Multimaterial 4D printing with tailorable shape memory polymers. Sci Rep2016; 6: 31110
224.
ZhuPYangWWangR, et al. 4D printing of complex structures with a fast response time to magnetic stimulus. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2018; 10: 36435–36442.
225.
HansenCJWuWTooheyKS, et al. Self-healing materials with interpenetrating microvascular networks. Adv. Mater., 2021; 21: 4143–4147.
226.
PostiglioneGAlberiniMLeighS, et al. Effect of 3D-printed microvascular network design on the self-healing behavior of cross-linked polymers. ACS Appl Mater Interf2017; 9: 14371–14378.
227.
ChortosAHajiesmailiEMoralesJ, et al. 3D printing of interdigitated dielectric elastomer actuators. Adv Fun Mater2020; 30(1): 1907375.
228.
YuKXinADuH, et al. Additive manufacturing of self-healing elastomers. NPG Asia Mater2019;11: 7
