Numerical study on the influence of process parameters in direct ink writing of high viscosity bio-inks

Abstract

This study uses a computational fluid dynamics model to investigate the effect of direct ink writing process parameters on the quality of 3D-printed sedimentary materials. The numerical simulation employs the level-set method of the two-phase flow module of COMSOL Multiphysics software. The selected bio-ink consists of the powder portion (45s5 bio-glass and β-TCP nanoparticles) and the polymer portion (polyvinyl alcohol), which has applications in constructing biological bone scaffolds. First, the empirical results validate the extrudate shape obtained from numerical simulation. According to the observations, increasing the inlet velocity from 15 mm/s increased the extruded ink distortion, and finally, at 50 mm/s, the distortion reached its maximum. Secondly, after calibration and validation results, the role of the most common nozzles with different diameters and input speeds on the maximum ink output velocity of the nozzle is predicted. Finally, the influence of the two dimensionless parameters (the ratio of the distance between nozzle and bed to nozzle diameter and the ratio of inlet ink velocity to print speed) on the adhesion and shape of the printed layers is examined. At distances greater than 1.5 times the diameter of the nozzle, when the extrusion speed is greater (more than 1.5 times) relative to the linear speed of the nozzle, the printed filament becomes uneven. Reducing the speed ratio between 1× and 1.5× prevents the printed filament from sticking to the substrate or causing distortion.

Keywords

3D printing additive manufacturing robocasting bioprinting numerical simulation COMSOL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Liu

Lin

. Rheological study on 3D printability of alginate hydrogel and effect of graphene oxide. Int J Bioprint 2016; 2: 54–66.

Hsu

T-R

. Miniaturization–A paradigm shift in advanced manufacturing and education. In: International conference on Advanced Manufacturing Technologies and Education in the 21st Century 2002.

Hardin

Ober

Valentine

, et al. Microfluidic printheads for multimaterial 3D printing of viscoelastic inks. Adv Mater 2015; 27: 3279–3284.

Chabinyc

Chiu

McDonald

, et al. An integrated fluorescence detection system in poly(dimethylsiloxane) for microfluidic applications. Anal Chem 2001; 73: 4491–4498.

Weigl

Yager

. Microfluidic diffusion-based separation and detection. Science 1999; 283: 346–347.

Ikuta

Hirowatari

Ogata

. Three dimensional micro integrated fluid systems (MIFS) fabricated by stereo lithography. Proc IEEE Micro Electro Mech Syst, Investig Micro Struct, Sensors, Actuators, Mach Robotic Syst 25–28 Jan. 1994; 1994: 1–6.

Anderson

Chiu

Jackman

, et al. Fabrication of topologically complex three-dimensional microfluidic systems in PDMS by rapid prototyping. Anal Chem 2000; 72: 3158–3164.

Ahn

Duoss

Motala

, et al. Omnidirectional printing of flexible, stretchable, and spanning silver microelectrodes. Science 2009; 323: 1590–1593.

Sirringhaus

Kawase

Friend

, et al. High-Resolution inkjet printing of all-polymer transistor circuits. Science 2000; 290: 2123–2126.

10.

Vaezi

Seitz

Yang

. A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2013; 67: 1721–1754.

11.

Sun

Zhou

Yan

, et al. Extrusion-based food printing for digitalized food design and nutrition control. J Food Eng 2018; 220: 1–11.

12.

Tian

Chen

. A brief review of dispensing-based rapid prototyping techniques in tissue scaffold fabrication: role of modeling on scaffold properties prediction. Biofabrication 2009; 1: 032001.

13.

Miettinen

Pekkanen

Kaija

, et al. Inkjet printed system-in-package design and manufacturing. Microelectron J 2008; 39: 1740–1750.

14.

Feilden

Blanca

EG-T

Giuliani

, et al. Robocasting of structural ceramic parts with hydrogel inks. J Eur Ceram Soc 2016; 36: 2525–2533.

15.

Cordonier

. Modeling and simulation of a direct-write manufacturing process. Morgantown, WV: West Virginia University, 2017.

16.

Turner

Strong

Gold

. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: i. Process design and modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 2014; 20: 192–204.

17.

Liravi

Darleux

Toyserkani

. Additive manufacturing of 3D structures with non-newtonian highly viscous fluids: finite element modeling and experimental validation. Additive Manuf 2017; 13: 113–123.

18.

Comminal

Serdeczny

Pedersen

, et al. Numerical modeling of the strand deposition flow in extrusion-based additive manufacturing. Additive Manuf 2018; 20: 68–76.

19.

Shen

Caldwell

AWK

, et al. Direct write fabrication of high-density parallel silver interconnects. Additive Manuf 2018; 22: 343–350.

20.

Balani

. Additive manufacturing of the high-performance thermoplastics: experimental study and numerical simulation of the fused filament fabrication. Toulouse, France: Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, 2019.

21.

Gray

Chen

. A self-healing, adaptive and conductive polymer composite ink for 3D printing of gas sensors. J Mater Chem C 2018; 6: 6200–6207.

22.

Olsson

Kreiss

. A conservative level set method for two phase flow. J Comput Phys 2005; 210: 225–246.

23.

Osher

Sethian

. Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J Comput Phys 1988, 79–49.

24.

https://www.comsol.com/material-library. (accessed 13 June, 2021)

25.

Balani

Chabert

Nassiet

, et al. Influence of printing parameters on the stability of deposited beads in fused filament fabrication of poly(lactic) acid. Additive Manuf 2019; 25: 112–121.