This work presents a viscoelastic in-plane damage model for fibrous composites. The material behavior is modeled as linear viscoelastic, with brittle failure in the fiber-dominated direction, and progressive degradation of the matrix-dominated properties, when the composite is loaded perpendicularly to the fibers or in in-plane shear. An evaluation procedure has been performed by comparing computational stress-strain curves against tensile tests curves under three different displacement rates. In addition, a calibration of the viscoelastic properties, by means of the response surface methodology, is also presented. The proposed material model has shown reasonable performance up to the material reaching an experimentally-verified modulus transition zone. Besides, the viscoelastic calibration procedure has produced a good agreement with the experimental results, concerning maximum stresses. It was observed that the computational stress-strain curve has deviated from the experimental one for higher stress values, indicating that it is necessary to improve the assessment of the nonlinear phenomena, which occur within the material.
TanWFalzonBGChiuLNS, et al.Predicting low-velocity impact damage and compression-after-impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2015; 71: 212–226.
2.
ObradovicJBoriaSBelingardiG. Lightweight design and crash analysis of composite frontal impact energy absorbing structures. Compos Struct2012; 94: 423–430.
3.
RibeiroMLVandepitteDTitaV. Experimental analysis of transverse impact loading on composite cylinders. Compos Struct2015; 133: 547–563.
4.
ThorntonPHJeryanRA. Crash energy management in composite automotive structures. Int J Impact Eng1988; 7: 167–180.
5.
MatzenmillerALublinerJTaylorRL. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater1995; 20: 125–152.
6.
LadevezePLe DantecE. Damage modelling of the elementary ply for laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol1992; 43: 257–267.
7.
Le DantecE. Contribution à la modelisation du comportement mécanique des composites stratifiés. PhD Thesis, Université Paris 6, France, 1989. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283711073.
RibeiroMLMedeirosR. Computational parametric study of low-velocity impact response of composite cylinder for automotive components. I J Auto C2015; 1: 131–157.
11.
PinhoSTIannucciLRobinsonP. Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: part II: FE implementation. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 766–777.
12.
BoriaSScattinaABelingardiG. Impact behavior of a fully thermoplastic composite. Compos Struct2017; 167: 63–75.
13.
GerbaudPWOteroFBussettaP, et al.An invariant based transversely-isotropic constitutive model for unidirectional fibre reinforced composites considering the matrix viscous effects. Mech Mater2019; 138: 12.
14.
SchaperyRA. Nonlinear viscoelastic constitutive equations for composites based on work potentials. Appl Mech Rev1994; 47, Part 2: S269–S275.
15.
LimTCRamakrishnaS. Modelling of composite sheet forming: a review. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2002; 33: 515–537.
16.
ZalVNaeiniHMSinkeJ,et al.A new procedure for finite element simulation of forming process of non-homogeneous composite laminates and FMLs. Compos Struct2017; 163: 444–453.
17.
AbouhamzehMSinkeJJansenKMB,et al.A new procedure for thermo-viscoelastic modelling of composites with general orthotropy and geometry. Compos Struct2015; 133: 871–877.
18.
HolzapfelGAGasserTC. A viscoelastic model for fiber-reinforced composites at finite strains: continuum basis, computational aspects and applications. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2001; 190: 4379–4403.
19.
Lakshmana RaoCNarayanamurthyVSimhaKRY. Applied impact mechanics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2016; pp. 172, 195, ch. 7; New Delhi, India: Ane Books Pvt. Ltd.
20.
MasonRLGunstRFHessJL. Statistical design and analysis of experiments: with applications to engineering and science. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003; pp. 568–613, 659–662, ch. 17, ch. 19.
21.
LemaitreJ. A course on damage mechanics. New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, 1992; pp. 1–94 (ch. 1–2).
22.
AllixOGuédra-DegeorgesDGuinardS, et al.Analyse de la tenue aux impacts à faible vitesse et faible énergie des stratifiés composites par la mécanique de l’endommagement. Mec Ind2000; 1: 27–35. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1296213900001056.
23.
RibeiroMLTitaVVandepitteD. A new damage model for composite laminates. Compos Struct2012; 94: 635–642.
24.
SaddMH. Continuum mechanics modeling of material behavior. London, UK; San Diego, CA, USA; Cambridge, MA, USA; Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc., 2019, p. 370.
25.
VoyiadjisGZKattanPI. A comparative study of damage variables in continuum damage mechanics. Int J Damage Mech2009; 18: 315–340.
26.
PinhoSTIannucciLRobinsonP. Physically-based failure models and criteria for laminated fibrereinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking: part I: development. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf2006; 37: 63–73.
27.
TitaVCarvalhoJVandepitteD. Failure analysis of low velocity impact on thin composite laminates: experimental and numerical approaches. Compos Struct2008; 83: 413–428.
28.
DonadonMVIannucciLFalzonBG, et al.A progressive failure model for composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact damage. Comput Struct2008; 86: 1232–1252.
Pekaje. Generalized Maxwell model. Wikimedia Commons, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Weichert.svg (2007, accessed 13 November 2021). Original height: 2000 pixels. Original width: 1500 pixels. Original size: 63.9 KB. Format: PNG; 2007.
31.
SimoJCHughesTJR. Computational inelasticity. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 1997; pp. 336–373, ch. 10.
32.
AdolfssonKEnelundM. Fractional derivative viscoelasticity at large deformations. Nonlinear Dyn2003; 33: 301–321.
33.
SpencerAJM. Constitutive theory for strongly anisotropic solids. In: SpencerAJM (ed) Continuum theory of the mechanics of fibre-reinforced composites. New York, USA: Springer-Verlag Wien GMBH, 1984, pp.22–31. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-4336-0.
34.
NedjarB. A time dependent model for unidirectional fibre-reinforced composites with viscoelastic matrices. Int J Solids Struct2011; 48: 2333–2339.
35.
VenaP. A computational model of viscoelastic composite materials for ligament or tendon prostheses. Adv Compos Lett2000; 9: 181–192.
36.
KaliskeM. A formulation of elasticity and viscoelasticity for fibre reinforced material at small and finite strains. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng2000; 185: 225–243.
37.
PavanRCOliveiraBFMaghousS,et al.A model for anisotropic viscoelastic damage in composites. Compos Struct2010; 92: 1223–1228.
WangCSWangASD, et al.Creep behavior of glass-epoxy composite laminates under hygrothermal conditions. In: Advances in composite materials: proceedings of the Third International Conference on Composite Materials (ed BunsellARBathiasCMartrencharA), Paris, France, 26–29 August 1980, pp.569–583. Oxford, UK; Elmsford, NY, USA; Willowdale, Ontario, Canada; Potts Point, NSW, Australia; Paris, France; Hammerweg, Germany: Pergamon. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4832-8370-8.50047-4.
47.
GoertzenWKKesslerMR. Creep behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A Struct Mater2006; 421: 217–225.
48.
AmerinatanziAMehrabiRIbrahimH,et al.Predicting the biodegradation of magnesium alloy implants: modeling, parameter identification, and validation. Bioengineering (Basel)2018; 5: paper 105, 15 pp. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering5040105
