Simulation-based assessment of coupled frequency response of magneto-electro-elastic auxetic multifunctional structures subjected to various electromagnetic circuits
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2022
Simulation-based assessment of coupled frequency response of magneto-electro-elastic auxetic multifunctional structures subjected to various electromagnetic circuits
This article deals with the modeling of magneto-electro-elastic auxetic structures and developing a methodology in COMSOL Multiphysics® to assess the free vibration response of such structures when subjected to various electromagnetic circuit conditions. The triple energy interaction between elastic, magnetic, and electric fields are established in the COMSOL Multiphysics® using structural mechanics and electromagnetic modules. The multiphase magneto-electro-elastic material with different percentages of piezoelectric and piezomagnetic phases are used as the material. In the solid mechanics module, the piezoelectric and piezomagnetic materials were created in stress-charge and stress-magnetization forms, respectively. The electric and magnetic fields are defined in COMSOL Multiphysics® through electromagnetic equations. Further, the customized controlled meshing constituted of free tetrahedral and triangular elements is adapted to trade-off between the accuracy and the computational expenses. The eigenvalue analysis is performed to obtain the natural frequencies of the MEE re-entrant auxetic structures. Also, the efficiency of smart auxetic structures over conventional honeycomb structures is presented throughout the manuscript. In addition, the discrepancy in the natural frequencies of the structures considering coupled and uncoupled state is also illustrated. It is believed that the modeling procedure and its outcomes serve as benchmark solutions for further design and analysis of smart auxetic magneto-electro-elastic structures.
YangCVoraHDChangY.Behavior of auxetic structures under compression and impact forces.Smart Mater Struct2018;
27.
2.
WangZLuanCLiaoG, et al.
Progress in auxetic mechanical metamaterials: structures,characteristics, manufacturing methods, and applications. Adv Eng Mater2020;
22: 1–23.
3.
RenXDasRTranP, et al.
Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review.Smart Mater Struct2018;
27.
4.
KelkarPUKimHSChoKH, et al.
Cellular auxetic structures for mechanical metamaterials: a review.Sensors (Switzerland)2020;
20: 1–26.
5.
NejadAFAlipourRRadMS, et al.
Using finite element approach for crashworthiness assessment of a polymeric auxetic structure subjected to the axial loading.Polymers (Basel)2020;
12.
6.
WangXTChenYLMaL.The manufacture and characterization of composite three-dimensional re-entrant auxetic cellular structures made from carbon fiber reinforced polymer.J Compos Mater2018;
52: 3265–3273.
7.
UlbinMBorovinšekMVesenjakM, et al.
Computational fatigue analysis of auxetic cellular structures made of SLM ALSI10mg alloy.Metals (Basel)2020;
10: 1–18.
8.
Shokri RadMHatamiHAlipouriR, et al.
Determination of energy absorption in different cellular auxetic structures.Mech Ind2019;
20: 15–20.
9.
WangXTWangBWenZH, et al.
Fabrication and mechanical properties of CFRP composite three-dimensional double-arrow-head auxetic structures.Compos Sci Technol2018;
164: 92–102.
10.
TaherkhaniBAnarakiAPKadkhodapourJ, et al.
Large deformation of TPU re-entrant auxetic structures designed by TO approach. J Elastomers Plast2020.
11.
NajafiMAhmadiHLiaghatG.Experimental investigation on energy absorption of auxetic structures.Mater Today Proc2021;
34: 350–355.
12.
ZhangJLuGYouZ.Large deformation and energy absorption of additively manufactured auxetic materials and structures: a review.Compos Part B: Eng2020; 201.
13.
StrekTMichalskiJJopekH.Computational analysis of the mechanical impedance of the sandwich beam with auxetic metal foam core.Phys Status Solidi Basic Res2019;
256: 1–8.
14.
MatuszewskaAStrekT.Vibration properties of auxetic beam.Vib Phys Syst2018;
29: 1–6.
15.
LiQYangD.Vibration and sound transmission performance of sandwich panels with uniform and gradient auxetic double arrowhead honeycomb cores.Shock Vib2019;
2019: 1–16.
16.
AboziedKOsmanMElmahdyT.Modal analysis and testing of modified re-entrant hexagonal honeycomb cores.Int Conf Appl Mech Mech Eng2016;
17: 1–11.
17.
DucNDSeung-EockKCongPH, et al.
Dynamic response and vibration of composite double curved shallow shells with negative Poisson’s ratio in auxetic honeycombs core layer on elastic foundations subjected to blast and damping loads.Int J Mech Sci2017;
133: 504–512.
18.
LiCShenHSWangH, et al.
Large amplitude vibration of sandwich plates with functionally graded auxetic 3D lattice core.Int J Mech Sci2020;
174.
19.
EghbaliPYounesianDFarhangdoustS.Enhancement of piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting with auxetic boosters.Int J Energy Res2020;
44: 1179–1190.
20.
EghbaliPYounesianDMoayedizadehA, et al.Study in circular auxetic structures for efficiency enhancement in piezoelectric vibration energy harvesting.Sci Rep2020;
10: 1–11.
21.
HuangXHYangJAzimI, et al.
Geometric non-linear analysis of auxetic hybrid laminated beams containing CNT reinforced composite materials.Materials (Basel)2020;
13: 1–23.
22.
Behravan RadA.Static analysis of non-uniform 2D functionally graded auxetic-porous circular plates interacting with the gradient elastic foundations involving friction force.
Issy Les Moulineaux, France:
Elsevier Masson SAS, 2018.
23.
VinyasM.Computational analysis of smart magneto-electro-elastic materials and structures: review and classification. ArchComput Methods Eng2020. DOI: 10.1007/s11831-020-09406-4.
24.
VinyasM.A higher-order free vibration analysis of carbon nanotube-reinforced magneto-electro-elastic plates using finite element methods. ComposPart B: Eng2019;
158: 286–301.
25.
YeWLiuJZangQ, et al.
Magneto-electro-elastic semi-analytical models for free vibration and transient dynamic responses of composite cylindrical shell structures.Mech Mater2020;
148: 103495.
26.
ChenJYHeyligerPRPanE.Free vibration of three-dimensional multilayered magneto-electro-elastic plates under combined clamped/free boundary conditions.J Sound Vib2014;
333: 4017–4029.
27.
ChenJChenHPanE, et al.
Modal analysis of magneto-electro-elastic plates using the state-vector approach.J Sound Vib2007;
304: 722–734.
28.
VinyasMSandeepASNguyen-ThoiT, et al.
A finite element–based assessment of free vibration behaviour of circular and annular magneto-electro-elastic plates using higher order shear deformation theory.J Intell Mater Syst Struct2019;
30: 2478–2501.
29.
VinyasMHarursampathDNguyen ThoiT.A higher order coupled frequency characteristics study of smart magneto-electro-elastic composite plates with cut-outs using finite element methods.Def Technol2021;
17: 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2020.02.009.
30.
VinyasMHarursampathD.Nonlinear vibrations of magneto-electro-elastic doubly curved shells reinforced with carbon nanotubes. Compos Struct2020;
253: 112749.
31.
EbrahimiFBaratiMR.A third-order parabolic shear deformation beam theory for nonlocal vibration analysis of magneto-electro-elastic nanobeams embedded in two-parameter elastic foundation.Adv Nano Res2017;
5: 313–336.
32.
MohammadimehrMHooyehHM.Vibration analysis of magneto-electro-elastic timoshenko micro beam using surface stress effect and modified strain gradient theory under moving nano-particle.J Solid Mech2018;
10: 1–22.
33.
VinyasMKattimaniSC.Static studies of stepped functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic beam subjected to different thermal loads. Compos Struct2017;
163: 216–237.
34.
VinyasMKattimaniSC.Hygrothermal analysis of magneto-electro-elastic plate using 3D finite element analysis.Compos Struct2017;
180: 617–637.
35.
MaheshV.Nonlinear deflection of CNT reinforced multiphase magneto-electro-elastic plates in thermal environment considering pyrocoupling effects.Math Methods Appl Sci2020. DOI: 10.1002/mma.6858.
VinyasMHarursampathD.Computational estimation of the effect of electro-magnetic circuits on the coupled response of multifunctional magneto-electro-elastic composites plates exposed to hygrothermal fields.Proc IMechE, Part C: J Mechanical Sciences2020.
38.
SoniSJainNKJoshiPV.Analytical modeling for nonlinear vibration analysis of partially cracked thin magneto-electro-elastic plate coupled with fluid.Nonlinear Dyn2017;
90: 137–170.
39.
YangYLiXF.Bending and free vibration of a circular magnetoelectroelastic plate with surface effects.Int J Mech Sci2019;
157–158: 858–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.05.029.
40.
VinyasMHarursampathDNguyen-ThoiT.Influence of active constrained layer damping on the coupled vibration response of functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic plates with skewed edges.Def Technol2020;
16: 1019–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2019.11.016.
41.
MaheshV.Interphase effect on the controlled frequency response of three-phase smart magneto-electro-elastic plates embedded with active constrained layer damping: FE study smart magneto-electro-elastic plates embedded with active constrained layer damping.Mater Res Express2018;
6: 125707.
42.
VinyasM.Vibration control of skew magneto-electro-elastic plates using active constrained layer damping.Compos Struct2019;
208: 600–617.
43.
VinyasMNischithGLojaMAR, et al.Numerical analysis of the vibration response of skew magneto-electro-elastic plates based on the higher-order shear deformation theory.Compos Struct2019;
214: 132–142.
44.
EbrahimiFFarazmandniaNKokabaMR, et al.
Vibration analysis of porous magneto-electro-elastically actuated carbon nanotube-reinforced composite sandwich plate based on a refined plate theory.Eng Comput2019;
5: 1–6.
45.
VinyasM.On frequency response of porous functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic circular and annular plates with different electro-magnetic conditions using HSDT.Compos Struct2020;
240: 112044.
46.
MaheshV.Porosity effect on the nonlinear deflection of functionally graded magneto-electro-elastic smart shells under combined loading. MechAdv Mater Struct2021. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2021.1875086.
47.
VinyasMHarursampathD.Nonlinear deflection analysis of CNT/magneto-electro-elastic smart shells under multi-physics loading. MechAdv Mater Struct2020. DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2020.1805059.
48.
COMSOL Multiphysics® v. 5.4. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018.
49.
SofiyevAH.The vibration and buckling of sandwich cylindrical shells covered by different coatings subjected to the hydrostatic pressure. Compos Struct2014;
117: 124–134.
50.
SofiyevAH.Review of research on the vibration and buckling of the FGM conical shells. Compos Struct2019;
211: 301–317.
51.
ValipourAKargozarfardMHRakhshiM, et al.Metamaterials and their applications: an overview. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials: Design and Applications2021. DOI: 10.1177/1464420721995858.
