Energy absorption parameters of multi-cell thin-walled structure with various thicknesses under lateral loading

Abstract

Energy absorbers are widely used in many engineering structures, especially mobile ones to prevent or alleviate the impact damages. Thin-walled structures are employed as an important category of energy-absorbing systems. In this study, the effect of thickness variations in different parts of a particular structure is investigated on the energy absorption behavior. The geometry of the considered structure is a four-cell squared-section of aluminum alloy 6061 that is subjected to the lateral loading and the thicknesses of the sides are defined as the input variables. For the systematic investigation of the input variables effect, design of experiments procedure is utilized. The simulations are performed by the LS-Dyna software using the finite element method based on the output data of design of experiments. Moreover, in order to ensure the accuracy and validity of the simulations, an experimental investigation has been conducted for one of the scenarios and the results are confirmed. According to the results of numerical investigations, it was found that all the input variables of the problem are effective with distinct and considerable trend in energy absorption of the structures. These trends are generally nonlinear and relative extremum can be observed in some of them. Finally, by analyzing the energy absorption process of the structures by response surface methodology, an optimal sample is selected and simulated; moreover, the identical sample is also subjected to experimental tests. The results showed approximately 272% enhancement in the specific energy absorption of the optimal sample in design of experiments table compared to the weakest one.

Keywords

Energy absorption thin-walled structures multi-cell section simulation design of experiment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Energy absorption of structures and materials. New York : Elsevier, 2003.

Abdewi

Sulaiman

Hamouda

, et al. Quasi-static axial and lateral crushing of radial corrugated composite tubes. Thin-Walled Struct 2008; 46: 320–332.

Nia

Beheshtiha

AS.

21st Annual International Conference on Mechanical Engineering-ISME2013, 7--9 May 2013, School of Mechanical Eng., K.N.Toosi University, Tehran, Iran.

Langseth

Hopperstad

Hanssen

Crash behaviour of thin-walled aluminium members.

Thin-Walled Struct 1998; 32: 127–150.

Wierzbicki

Bhat

Abramowicz

, et al. Alexander revisited—a two folding elements model of progressive crushing of tubes. Int J Solids Struct 1992; 29: 3269–3288.

Baroutaji

Gilchrist

Olabi

Quasi-static, impact and energy absorption of internally nested tubes subjected to lateral loading. Thin-Walled Struct 2016; 98: 337–350.

Abramowicz

Jones

Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes. Int J Impact Eng 1986; 4: 243–270.

Abramowicz

Wierzbicki

Axial crushing of multicorner sheet metal columns. J Appl Mech 1989; 56: 113–120.

Yang

An internally nested circular-elliptical tube system for energy absorption. Thin-Walled Structures 2019; 139: 281--293.

10.

Shams

Olabi

Quasi-static flattening energy absorption process on preformed circular tubes by numerical and experimental analyses. Thin-Walled Structures 2019; 144: 106260.

11.

Alexander

An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading. Quart J Mech Appl Math 1960; 13: 10–15.

12.

Birch

Jones

Dynamic and static axial crushing of axially stiffened cylindrical shells. Thin-Walled Struct 1990; 9: 29–60.

13.

Hanssen

Langseth

Hopperstad

OS.

Static and dynamic crushing of circular aluminium extrusions with aluminium foam filler. Int J Impact Eng 2000; 24: 475–507.

14.

Seitzberger

Rammerstorfer

Gradinger

, et al. Experimental studies on the quasi-static axial crushing of steel columns filled with aluminium foam. Int J Solids Struct 2000; 37: 4125–4147.

15.

Zhang

Experimental and numerical investigation on crush resistance of polygonal columns and angle elements. Thin-Walled Struct 2012; 57: 25–36.

16.

Zhang

Suzuki

A study on the effect of stiffeners on quasi-static crushing of stiffened square tube with non-linear finite element method. Int J Impact Eng 2007; 34: 544–555.

17.

Zhang

Cheng

Zhang

Theoretical prediction and numerical simulation of multi-cell square thin-walled structures. Thin-Walled Struct 2006; 44: 1185–1191.

18.

Nia

Parsapour

Comparative analysis of energy absorption capacity of simple and multi-cell thin-walled tubes with triangular, square, hexagonal and octagonal sections. Thin-Walled Struct 2014; 74: 155–165.

19.

Firouzi

Niknejad

Optimization of H-shaped thin-walled energy absorber by Taguchi method and a new theoretical estimation for its energy absorption. Thin-Walled Structures 2018; 131: 33--44.

20.

Shojaeifard

Zarei

Talebitooti

, et al. Bending behavior of empty and foam-filled aluminum tubes with different cross-sections. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 2012; 25: 616--626.

21.

Tran

Crushing and theoretical analysis of multi-cell thin-walled triangular tubes under lateral loading. Thin-Walled Struct 2017; 115: 205–214.

22.

ASTM, E8M. www.astm.org 2010.

23.

ASTM, E125. www.astm.org 2005.

24.

Hallquist JO. LS-DYNA theory manual. Livermore software Technology corporation 2006; 3: 25--31.

25.

Akhavan Attar

Kazemi

Investigation on crushing behavior of laminated conical absorbers with different arrangements under axial loading. J Mater: Des Appl 2019; 234: 394–407.