This study addresses the effects of roughness anisotropy in the tribological behavior of AA5083. Wear tests were carried out using a reciprocating tribometer under a contact pressure of 200 MPa. Sliding was performed on three topographic orientations. The friction force was recorded instantaneously. Furthermore, microscopic analyses were conducted for the purpose of characterizing the wear mechanisms. The findings proved the sensitivity of friction and wear of the initial surface properties. A numerical model of the reciprocated test was, in addition, developed upon ABAQUS/Explicit to better understand the evolution of equivalent plastic deformation during sliding. The proposed model is able to simulate a real surface profile described using python scripts. The model was found very useful in highlighting the significant effect of surface anisotropy on the stress distribution and plastic deformation.
ChenCBosseHDetersL. Effects of various base oils and additives on the tribological behaviour of lubricated aluminium-on-aluminium and steel-on-aluminium contacts. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part J: J Eng Tribol2009; 223: 571–580.
2.
RenoufMMassiFFillotNet al.Numerical tribology of a dry contact. Tribol Int2011; 44: 834–844.
3.
Ismail R, Tauviqirrahman M, Schipper J, et al. Two-dimensional finite element analysis on running-in of elastic-plastic rolling contact. In: The 4th Asian physics symposium: an international event, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, 12–13 October 2010, pp.190–193. USA: AIP Conf. Proc.
4.
ChaSCErdemirA. Coating technology for vehicle applications, 1st ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 240–240.
5.
StickelDFischerABosmanR. Specific dissipated friction power distributions of machined carburized martensitic steel surfaces during running-in. Wear2015; 330–331: 32–41.
6.
StickelDGoekeSGeenenKet al.Reciprocating sliding wear of case-hardened spheroidal cast iron against 100Cr6 under boundary lubrication. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2015; 229: 1214–1226.
7.
StickelDFischerA. The influence of topography on the specific dissipated friction power in ultra-mild sliding wear: experiment and simulation. Tribol Int2015; 91: 48–59.
8.
MeineKSchneiderTSpaltmannDet al.The influence of roughness on friction, part I: the influence of a single step. Wear2002; 253: 725–732.
9.
DemirciIMezghaniSYousfiMet al.Multi-scale analysis of the roughness effect on lubricated rough contact. J Tribol2014; 136: 011501-1–011501-8.
10.
GualtieriEPugnoNRotaAet al.Role of roughness parameters on the tribology of randomly nano-textured silicon surface. J Nanosci Nanotechnol2011; 11: 9244–9250.
11.
DzierwaA. Influence of surface preparation on surface topography and tribological behaviours. Arch Civ Mech Eng2017; 17: 502–510.
12.
MenezesPLKishoreKailasSV. Studies on friction and transfer layer using inclined scratch. Tribol Int2006; 39: 175–183.
13.
MenezesPLKishoreKailasSVet al.Influence of inclination angle of plate on friction, stick-slip and transfer layer – a study of magnesium pin sliding against steel plate. Tribol Int2009; 267: 476–484.
14.
GrzesikW. Influence of surface textures produced by finishing operations on their functional properties. J Mach Eng2016; 16: 15–23.
15.
ElwasliFMzaliSZemzemiFet al.Effects of initial surface topography and contact regimes on tribological behavior of AISI-52100/AA5083 materials’ pair when reciprocating sliding. Int J Mech Sci2018; 137: 271–283.
16.
SedlačekMPodgornikBVižintinJ. Influence of surface preparation on roughness parameters, friction and wear. Wear2009; 266: 482–487.
17.
SedlačekMPodgornikBVižintinJ. Correlation between standard roughness parameters skewness and kurtosis and tribological behaviour of contact surfaces. Tribol Int2012; 48: 102–112.
18.
Elwasli F, Mzali S, Zemzemi F, et al. Effects of pretextured surface topography on friction and wear of AA5083/AISI52100 materials’ pair. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 2018, pp.771–779.
19.
MenezesPLKishoreKailasSV. Effect of roughness parameter and grinding angle on coefficient of friction when sliding of Al–Mg alloy over EN8 steel. J Tribol2006; 128: 697–704.
20.
MenezesPLKishoreKailasSV. On the effect of surface texture on friction and transfer layer formation – a study using Al and steel pair. Wear2008; 265: 1655–1669.
21.
MenezesPLKishoreKailasSVet al.Influence of inclination angle and machining direction on friction and transfer layer formation. J Tribol2011; 133: 014501–014501.
22.
HolmbergKLaukkanenARonkainenHet al.Topographical orientation effects on friction and wear in sliding DLC and steel contacts, part 1: experimental. Wear2015; 330–331: 3–22.
23.
ChoiYLeeJ. A study on the effects of surface dimple geometry on fretting fatigue performance. Int J Precis Eng Manuf2015; 16: 707–713.
24.
RipollMRPodgornikBVižintinJ. Finite element analysis of textured surfaces under reciprocating sliding. Wear2011; 271: 952–959.
25.
Lestari WD. The von Mises stress distribution on the surface of UHMWPE with texture-shaped variation in the presence of normal load and dry sliding contact. In: 7th International conference on mechanical and manufacturing engineering, 2017, pp.1–6. USA: AIP.
26.
ZhangHHuaM. Improvement of tribology behaviors by optimizing concave texture shape under reciprocating sliding motion. J Tribol2016; 139: 011701–011701.
27.
DzierwaA. Influence of steel surface preparation method on topography and tribological behaviour in dry sliding conditions. Key Eng Mater2016; 674: 265–270.
28.
MenezesPLKishoreKailasSVet al.Role of surface texture, roughness, and hardness on friction during unidirectional sliding. Tribol Lett2011; 41: 1–15.
29.
GuezmilMBensalahWMezliniS. Effect of bio-lubrication on the tribological behavior of UHMWPE against M30NW stainless steel. Tribol Int2016; 94: 550–559.
30.
LemaitreJChabocheJ. Mécanique des matériaux solides, Paris: Dunod, 2001, pp. 572–572.
31.
SidhomNMoussaNBJanebSet al.Potential fatigue strength improvement of AA 5083-H111 notched parts by wire brush hammering: experimental analysis and numerical simulation. Mater Des2014; 64: 503–519.
32.
ElwasliFZemzemiFMkaddemAet al.A 3D multi-scratch test model for characterizing material removal regimes in 5083-Al alloy. Mater Des2015; 87: 352–362.
33.
HisakadoT. Effect of abrasive particle size on fraction of debris removed from plowing volume in abrasive wear. Wear1999; 236: 24–33.
StoutK. Surface roughness: measurement, interpretation and significance of data. Mater Des1981; 2: 287–295.
37.
CharooMSWaniMFHaniefMet al.Tribological characteristics of EN8 and EN24 steel against aluminium alloy 6061 under lubricated condition. Adv Mater Proc2017; 2: 445–449.
