Geopolymers exhibit various unique properties and characteristics, including high compressive strength, high temperature stability, and low thermal conductivity. As a relatively new and perspective material, the behavior of geopolymers subjected to high temperatures is being intensively studied nowadays. This review summarizes the recent achievements in the development of geopolymer-based fire resistance materials. Technological parameters, which influence thermal behavior of geopolymer-based materials, are also discussed. Besides that, recent applications of geopolymers according to their composition are presented.
HardjitoDWallahSESumajouwDMet al.On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater J2004; 101.
2.
Malhotra V. Role of fly ash in reducing greenhouse gas emissions during the manufacturing of portland cement clinker. In: Advances in concrete technologies in the Middle East, 2008, pp.19–20.
3.
Mustafa Al BakriAMKamarudinHBinhussainMet al.The effect of curing temperature on physical and chemical properties of geopolymers. Phys Procedia2011; 22: 286–291.
4.
DavidovitsJ. Global warming impact on the cement and aggregates industries. World Resour Rev1994; 6: 263–278.
5.
Mustafa Al BakriAMMohammedHKamarudinHet al.Review on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete without Portland Cement. J Eng Technol Res2011; 3: 1–4.
6.
KomnitsasKZaharakiD. Geopolymerisation: a review and prospects for the minerals industry. Miner Eng2007; 20: 1261–1277.
7.
HeahCYKamarudinHMustafa Al BakriAMet al.Potential application of kaolin without calcine as greener concrete: A review. Aust J Basic Appl Sci2011; 5: 1026–1035.
8.
KhaleDChaudharyR. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: A review. J Mater Sci2007; 42: 729–746.
9.
LiCSunHLiL. A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements. Cem Concr Res2010; 40: 1341–1349.
10.
DuxsonPFernández-JiménezAProvisJet al.Geopolymer technology: The current state of the art. J Mater Sci2007; 42: 2917–2933.
11.
SinghBIshwaryaGGuptaMet al.Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Constr Build Mater2015; 85: 78–90.
12.
SalahuddinMMNorkhairunnisaMMustaphaF. A review on thermophysical evaluation of alkali-activated geopolymers. Ceram Int2015; 41: 4273–4281.
13.
LyonREBalaguruPFodenAet al.Fire-resistant aluminosilicate composites. Fire Mater1997; 21: 67–73.
14.
KhaterH. Studying the effect of thermal and acid exposure on alkali-activated slag geopolymer. Adv Cem Res2013; 26: 1–9.
15.
LiewYMKamarudinHMustafa Al BakriAMet al.Processing and characterization of calcined kaolin cement powder. Constr Build Mater2012; 30: 794–802.
16.
Glukhovsky V. Soil silicates. Kiev: Gosstroyizdat Ukrainy Publishing, 1959, p. 154.
17.
KrivenkoPKovalchukGY. Directed synthesis of alkaline aluminosilicate minerals in a geocement matrix. J Mater Sci2007; 42: 2944–2952.
18.
Krivenko P and Skurchinskaya J. Fly ash containing geocements. In: 1991 Shanghai international conference on the utilisation of fly ash and other coal combustion by-products, 1991, pp.64–71.
19.
Mustafa Al BakriAMLiyanaJKamarudinHet al.Study on fly ash based geopolymer for coating applications. Adv Mater Res2013; 686: 227–233.
RowlesMO’connorB. Chemical optimisation of the compressive strength of aluminosilicate geopolymers synthesised by sodium silicate activation of metakaolinite. J Mater Chem2003; 13: 1161–1165.
DimasDGiannopoulouIPaniasD. Polymerization in sodium silicate solutions: A fundamental process in geopolymerization technology. J Mater Sci2009; 44: 3719–3730.
27.
AlonsoSPalomoA. Calorimetric study of alkaline activation of calcium hydroxide–metakaolin solid mixtures. Cem Concr Res2001; 31: 25–30.
28.
ZhangYJWangYCLiS. Mechanical performance and hydration mechanism of geopolymer composite reinforced by resin. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 6574–6580.
29.
HeahCYLiewYMMustafa Al BakriAMet al.Fire resistant properties of geopolymers: A review. Key Eng Mater2015; 660: 39–43.
30.
HePJiaDLinTet al.Effects of high-temperature heat treatment on the mechanical properties of unidirectional carbon fiber reinforced geopolymer composites. Ceram Int2010; 36: 1447–1453.
31.
ZhangZProvisJLReidAet al.Mechanical, thermal insulation, thermal resistance and acoustic absorption properties of geopolymer foam concrete. Cem Concr Compos2015; 62: 97–105.
32.
TemuujinJMinjigmaaARickardWet al.Preparation of metakaolin based geopolymer coatings on metal substrates as thermal barriers. Appl Clay Sci2009; 46: 265–270.
33.
TemuujinJMinjigmaaARickardWet al.Fly ash based geopolymer thin coatings on metal substrates and its thermal evaluation. J Hazard Mater2010; 180: 748–752.
34.
ZhangZYaoXZhuH. Potential application of geopolymers as protection coatings for marine concrete: II. Microstructure and anticorrosion mechanism. Appl Clay Sci2010; 49: 7–12.
35.
KhanMIAzizliKSufianSet al.Sodium silicate-free geopolymers as coating materials: Effects of Na/Al and water/solid ratios on adhesion strength. Ceram Int2015; 41: 2794–2805.
36.
De BarrosSDe SouzaJGomesKet al.Adhesion of geopolymer bonded joints considering surface treatments. J Adhes2012; 88: 364–375.
37.
BernalSARodríguezEDde GutiérrezRMet al.Mechanical and thermal characterisation of geopolymers based on silicate-activated metakaolin/slag blends. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 5477–5486.
38.
SarkerPKKellySYaoZ. Effect of fire exposure on cracking, spalling and residual strength of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Mater Des2014; 63: 584–592.
39.
ChengTChiuJ. Fire-resistant geopolymer produced by granulated blast furnace slag. Miner Eng2003; 16: 205–210.
40.
SunZCuiHAnHet al.Synthesis and thermal behavior of geopolymer-type material from waste ceramic. Constr Build Mater2013; 49: 281–287.
41.
YeJZhangWShiD. Effect of elevated temperature on the properties of geopolymer synthesized from calcined ore-dressing tailing of bauxite and ground-granulated blast furnace slag. Constr Build Mater2014; 69: 41–48.
42.
RegoSGomesKRosasMet al.Application of geopolymeric adhesives in ceramic systems subjected to cyclic temperature environments. J Adhes2014; 90: 120–133.
43.
BakharevT. Thermal behaviour of geopolymers prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem Concr Res2006; 36: 1134–1147.
44.
ZhangZProvisJLReidAet al.Mechanical, thermal insulation, thermal resistance and acoustic absorption properties of geopolymer foam concrete (GFC). Cem Concr Compos2015.
45.
KongDLSanjayanJG. Effect of elevated temperatures on geopolymer paste, mortar and concrete. Cem Concr Res2010; 40: 334–339.
46.
RickardWDVan RiessenA. Performance of solid and cellular structured fly ash geopolymers exposed to a simulated fire. Cem Concr Compos2014; 48: 75–82.
47.
VickersLvan RiessenARickardWD. Fire-resistant geopolymers: Role of fibres and fillers to enhance thermal properties, New York: Springer, 2015.
48.
TemuujinJRickardWLeeMet al.Preparation and thermal properties of fire resistant metakaolin-based geopolymer-type coatings. J Non-Cryst Solids2011; 357: 1399–1404.
49.
Mustafa Al BakriAMLiyanaJKamarudinHet al.Study on fly ash based geopolymer for coating applications. Adv Mater Res2013; 686: 227–233.
50.
SarkerPKMcbeathS. Fire endurance of steel reinforced fly ash geopolymer concrete elements. Constr Build Mater2015; 90: 91–98.
51.
AbdulkareemOAMustafa Al BakriAMKamarudinHet al.Effects of elevated temperatures on the thermal behavior and mechanical performance of fly ash geopolymer paste, mortar and lightweight concrete. Constr Build Mater2014; 50: 377–387.
52.
TemuujinJRickardWVan RiessenA. Characterization of various fly ashes for preparation of geopolymers with advanced applications. Adv Powder Technol2013; 24: 495–498.
53.
Mustafa Al BakriAMLiyanaJKamarudinHet al.Fly ash porous material using geopolymerization process for high temperature exposure. Int J Molec Sci2012; 13: 4388–4395.
54.
Rangan BV, Hardjito D, Wallah SE, et al. Studies on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of 4th world congress on geopolymer, Saint Quentin, France, 2005, pp.133–137.
55.
Rangan BV. Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on geopolymer cement and concrete, 2010, pp.68–106.
56.
MalhotraV. Reducing CO2 emissions. Concr Int2006; 28: 42–45.
57.
Mustafa Al BakriAMKamarudinHAbdulkareemOAet al.Optimization of alkaline activator/fly ash ratio on the compressive strength of manufacturing fly ash-based geopolymer. Appl Mech Mater2012; 110–116: 734–739.
58.
Mustafa Al BakriAMKamarudinHNizarIKet al.Correlation between Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio and fly ash/alkaline activator ratio to the strength of geopolymer. Adv Mater Res2012; 341–342: 189–193.
59.
GuoXShiHDickWA. Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly ash geopolymer. Cem Concr Compos2010; 32: 142–147.
60.
KongDLSanjayanJG. Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperatures. Cem Concr Compos2008; 30: 986–991.
61.
RattanasakUChindaprasirtP. Influence of NaOH solution on the synthesis of fly ash geopolymer. Miner Eng2009; 22: 1073–1078.
62.
Villaquirán-CaicedoMAde GutiérrezRMSulekarSet al.Thermal properties of novel binary geopolymers based on metakaolin and alternative silica sources. Appl Clay Sci2015; 118: 276–282.
63.
XuHVan DeventerJLukeyG. Effect of alkali metals on the preferential geopolymerization of stilbite/kaolinite mixtures. Ind Eng Chem Res2001; 40: 3749–3756.
64.
ChristyCFTensingD. Greener building material with fly ash. Asian J Civil Eng2011; 12: 87–105.
65.
Bernal SA, Krivenko PV, Provis JL, et al. Other potential applications for alkali-activated materials. In: John P and Jannie van D (eds) Alkali activated materials. New York: Springer, 2014, pp.339–379.
66.
KumarSKumarRMehrotraS. Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer. J Mater Sci2010; 45: 607–615.
67.
HeahCYKamarudinHMustafa Al BakriAMet al.Study on solids-to-liquid and alkaline activator ratios on kaolin-based geopolymers. Constr Build Mater2012; 35: 912–922.
68.
HeahCYKamarudinHMustafa Al BakriAMet al.Curing behavior on kaolin-based geopolymers. Adv Mater Res2012; 548: 42–47.
69.
LiewYMKamarudinHMustafa Al BakriAMet al.Investigating the possibility of utilization of kaolin and the potential of metakaolin to produce green cement for construction purposes–a review. Aust J Basic Appl Sci2011; 5: 441–449.
XuHVan DeventerJS. Microstructural characterisation of geopolymers synthesised from kaolinite/stilbite mixtures using XRD, MAS-NMR, SEM/EDX, TEM/EDX, and HREM. Cem Concr Res2002; 32: 1705–1716.
72.
XuHVan DeventerJ. The geopolymerisation of natural alumino-silicates. Proc Geopolymere1999; 99: 43–64.
73.
PalomoABlanco-VarelaMGranizoMet al.Chemical stability of cementitious materials based on metakaolin. Cem Concr Res1999; 29: 997–1004.
74.
CioffiRMaffucciLSantoroL. Optimization of geopolymer synthesis by calcination and polycondensation of a kaolinitic residue. Resour Conserv Recycl2003; 40: 27–38.
75.
KongDLSanjayanJGSagoe-CrentsilK. Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperatures. Cem Concr Res2007; 37: 1583–1589.
76.
GomesKCLimaGSTorresSMet al.Iron distribution in geopolymer with ferromagnetic rich precursor. Mater Sci Forum2010; 643: 131–138.
77.
ProvisJLVan DeventerJSJ. Geopolymers: Structures, processing, properties and industrial applications, New York: Elsevier, 2009.
78.
LiewYMKamarudinHMustafa Al BakriAMet al.Influence of solids-to-liquid and activator ratios on calcined kaolin cement powder. Phys Procedia2011; 22: 312–317.
79.
Lloyd NA, Rangan BV. Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. In: Second international conference on sustainable construction materials and technologies, Vol. 3, 28 June 2010, pp.1493–1504. UWM Centre for By-products Utilization.
80.
Mustafa Al BakriAMKamarudinHBinhussainMet al.The relationship of NaOH molarity, Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio, fly Ash/Alkaline activator ratio, and curing temperature to the strength of fly ash-based geopolymer. Adv Mater Res2011; 328–330: 1475–1482.
81.
Tempest B, Sanusi O, Gergely J, et al. Compressive strength and embodied energy optimization of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. In: World of coal ash (WOCA) conference, Lexington, KY, USA, 4–7 May 2009, pp.1–17.
82.
RovnaníkP. Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater2010; 24: 1176–1183.
83.
Wallah S and Rangan BV. Low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: Long-term properties. Res Report-GC2, Curtin University, Australia, 2006, pp.76–80.
84.
WangHLiHYanF. Synthesis and mechanical properties of metakaolinite-based geopolymer. Colloids Surf A: Physicochem Eng Aspects2005; 268: 1–6.
85.
Davidovits J. Properties of geopolymer cements. In: First international conference on alkaline cements and concretes, Scientific Research Institute on Binders and Materials, Vol. 1, Kiev State Technical University, Kiev, Ukraine, 11 October 1994, pp.131–149.
86.
FletcherRAMacKenzieKJNicholsonCLet al.The composition range of aluminosilicate geopolymers. J Eur Ceram Soc2005; 25: 1471–1477.
87.
GharzouniAJousseinESametBet al.Effect of the reactivity of alkaline solution and metakaolin on geopolymer formation. J Non-Cryst Solids2015; 410: 127–134.
88.
YaoXZhangZZhuHet al.Geopolymerization process of alkali–metakaolinite characterized by isothermal calorimetry. Thermochim Acta2009; 493: 49–54.
89.
De SilvaPGlasserF. Pozzolanic activation of metakaolin. Adv Cem Res1992; 4: 167–178.
90.
Hardjito D, Wallah S, Sumajouw D, et al. Brief review of development of geopolymer concrete. In: 8th CANMET/ACI international conference on fly ash, silica fume, slag and natural pozzolans in concrete, Las Vegas, USA, 2004.
91.
Valadez-GonzalezACervantes-UcJOlayoRet al.Effect of fiber surface treatment on the fiber–matrix bond strength of natural fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B: Eng1999; 30: 309–320.
92.
XuHVan DeventerJ. The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals. Int J Miner Process2000; 59: 247–266.
93.
DuxsonPLukeyGCvan DeventerJS. Physical evolution of Na-geopolymer derived from metakaolin up to 1000 C. J Mater Sci2007; 42: 3044–3054.
94.
ZhangHYKodurVQiSLet al.Development of metakaolin–fly ash based geopolymers for fire resistance applications. Constr Build Mater2014; 55: 38–45.
95.
TemuujinJWilliamsRVan RiessenA. Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. J Mater Process Technol2009; 209: 5276–5280.
96.
ChindaprasirtPDe SilvaPHanjitsuwanS. Effect of high-speed mixing on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer paste. Arab J Sci Eng2014; 39: 6001–6007.
97.
ChindaprasirtPChareeratTSirivivatnanonV. Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cem Concr Compos2007; 29: 224–229.
98.
ChindaprasirtPDe SilvaPSagoe-CrentsilKet al.Effect of SiO2 and Al2O3 on the setting and hardening of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer systems. J Mater Sci2012; 47: 4876–4883.
99.
Mustafa Al BakriAMTahirMFMKamarudinHet al.Fly ash based lightweight geopolymer concrete using foaming agent technology. Revista Chim2015; 66: 1001–1003.
100.
PuligillaSMondalP. Role of slag in microstructural development and hardening of fly ash-slag geopolymer. Cem Concr Res2013; 43: 70–80.
101.
Drechsler M and Graham A. Geopolymersan innovative materials technology bringing resource sustainability to construction and mining industries. In: Institute of Quarrying Australia, Annual Conference, 2005.
102.
HardjitoDWallahSESumajouwDet al.Properties of geopolymer concrete with fly ash as source material: effect of mixture composition. ACI Special Publication2004; 222.
103.
Davidovits J. 30 years of successes and failures in geopolymer applications. Market trends and potential breakthroughs. In: Keynote Conference on Geopolymer Conference, Melbourne, Australia, 28 October 2002.
104.
WangK-tHeYSongX-let al.Effects of the metakaolin-based geopolymer on high-temperature performances of geopolymer/PVC composite materials. Appl Clay Sci2015; 114: 586–592.
105.
DuanPYanCLuoWet al.A novel surface waterproof geopolymer derived from metakaolin by hydrophobic modification. Mater Lett2016; 164: 172–175.
106.
ChenCHLiHCTengCCet al.Fusion, electrical conductivity, thermal, and mechanical properties of rigid poly (vinyl chloride)(PVC)/carbon black (CB) composites. J Appl Polym Sci2006; 99: 2167–2173.
107.
Krivenko PV, Pushkavera YK, Sukhanevich MV, et al. Fireproof coatings on the basis of alkaline aluminum silicate systems. In: Developments in Strategic Materials: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings. State Scientific Research Institute of Binders and Materials, Kiev, Ukraine, Vol. 29, 15 April 2009, pp.129–142.
108.
Davidovits J. Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on geopolymer, Saint Quentin, 1999, pp.9–40.
