A three-dimensional finite element model for scarf-repaired composite laminate was established on continuum damage model to predict the load capacity under tensile loading. The mixed-mode cohesive zone model was adopted to the debonding behavior analysis of adhesive. Damage condition and failure of laminates and adhesive were subsequently addressed. A three-dimensional bilinear constitutive model was developed for composite materials based on damage mechanics and applied to damage evolution and loading capacity analyses by quantifying damage level through damage state variables. The numerical analyses were implemented with ABAQUS finite element analysis by coding the constitutive model into material subroutine VUMAT. Good agreement between the numerical and experimental results shows the accuracy and adaptability of the model.
BakerAAB. Composite materials for aircraft structures, Reston, VA: AIAA, 2004.
4.
BakerAAB. Bonded repair of aircraft structures, New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
5.
BaneaMDda SilvaLFM. Adhesively bonded joints in composite materials: An overview. Proc IMechE, Part L: J Materials Design and Applications2009; 223: 1–18.
6.
Ahn SH and Springer GS. Repair of composite laminates. DOT/FAA/AR-00/46, 2000.
7.
Ilcewicz L, Cheng L, Hafenricher J, et al. Guidelines for the development of a critical composite maintenance and repair issues awareness course. DOT/FAA/AR-08/54, 2009.
8.
KatnamKBda SilvaLFMYoungTM. Bonded repair of composite aircraft structures: A review of scientific challenges and opportunities. Prog Aerosp Sci2013; 61: 26–42.
9.
SoutisCHuFZ. Design and performance of bonded patch repairs of composite structures. Proc IMechE, Part G: J Aerospace Engineering1997; 211: 263–271.
10.
KumarSBSridharISivashankerSet al.Tensile failure of adhesively bonded CFRP composite scarf joints. Mater Sci Eng B2006; 132: 113–120.
11.
Camanho PP and Dávila CG. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TP-211737(1), 2002, p. 33.
12.
ChangFKChangKY. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations. J Compos Mater1987; 21: 834–855.
13.
TanSC. A progressive failure model for composite laminates containing openings. J Compos Mater1991; 25: 556–577.
14.
LinGWChenPH. PDA-CZM method for failure analysis of bonded repair of composite laminates. Acta Aeronaut Astronaut Sin2009; 30: 1877–1882.
15.
Guo X, Guan ZD, Liu S, et al. Tensile behavior and parameters designing of double-sides flush repair of composite laminates. Acta Mater Compos Sin 2012; 29: 176–182.
16.
GunelMKayranA. Non-linear progressive failure analysis of open-hole composite laminates under combined loading. J Sandwich Struct Mater2013; 15: 309–339.
17.
Perillo G, Vedvik NP and Echtermeyer AT. Numerical application of three-dimensional failure criteria for laminated composite materials. In: Proceedings of the Simulia Customer Conference, Barcelona, Spain, 2011.
18.
LapczykIHurtadoJA. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2007; 38: 2333–2341.
19.
MaimíPCamanhoPPMayugoJAet al.A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part II - Computational implementation and validation. Mech Mater2007; 39: 909–919.
20.
MatzenmillerALublinerJTaylorRL. A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater1995; 20: 125–152.
21.
Camanho PP, Dávila CG and Ambur DR. Numerical simulation of delamination growth in composite materials. NASA/TP-211041, 2001.
