ChoHBartyczakSMockWJr., et al.Dissipation and resilience of elastomeric segmented copolymers under extreme strain rates. Polymer2013; 54: 5952–5964.
2.
ChoHRinaldiRGBoyce, et al.Constitutive modeling of the rate-dependent resilient and dissipative large deformation behavior of a segmented copolymer polyurea. Soft Matter2013; 9: 6319–6330.
3.
SarvaSSDeschanelSBoyceMC, et al.Stress-strain behavior of a polyurea and a polyurethane from low to high strain rates. Polymer2007; 48: 2208–2213.
4.
YiJBoyceMCLeeGF, et al.Large deformation rate-dependent stress-strain behavior of polyurea and polyurethanes. Polymer2006; 47: 319–329.
5.
GrujicicMPanduranganBKingAE, et al.Multi-length scale modeling and analysis of microstructure evolution and mechanical properties in polyurea. J Mater Sci2011; 46: 1767–1779.
6.
AmirkhiziAVIsaacsJMcGeeJ, et al.An experimentally-based viscoelastic constitutive model for polyurea, including pressure and temperature effects. Phil Mag2006; 86: 5847–5866.
7.
QiaoJAmirkhiziAVSchaafK, et al.Dynamic mechanical and ultrasonic properties of polyurea. Mech Mater2011; 43: 598–607.
8.
GrujicicMHeTPanduranganB, et al.Experimental characterization and material-model development for microphase-segregated polyurea: an overview. J Mater Eng Perf2011; 21: 2–16.
9.
GrujicicMSnipesJSGalgalikarR, et al.Material-model based determination of the shock-Hugoniot relations in nanosegregated polyurea. J Mater Eng Perf2014; 23: 357–371.
10.
RolandCMCasaliniR. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on the viscoelastic response of polyurea. Polymer2007; 48: 5747–5752.
11.
RolandCMTwiggJNVuY, et al.High strain rate mechanical behavior of polyurea. Polymer2007; 48: 574–578.
12.
CuiZWBrinsonLC. Thermomechanical properties and deformation of coarse-grained models of hard-soft block copolymers. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys2013; 88: 022602–022602.
13.
Mock W, Jr., Bartyczak S, Lee G, et al. Dynamic properties of polyurea 1000. In: Shock compression of condensed matter - 2009, pts 1 and 2: AIP Conference Proceedings 2009, Nashville, TN, USA, 1195, pp.1241–1244.
14.
YoussefGGuptaV. Dynamic response of polyurea subjected to nanosecond rise-time stress waves. Mech Time-Depend Mater2012; 16: 317–328.
15.
YoussefGGuptaV. Dynamic tensile strength of polyurea. J Mater Res2012; 27: 494–499.
16.
GrujicicMHeTPanduranganB, et al.Development and parameterization of a time-invariant (equilibrium) material model for segmented elastomeric polyureas. J Mater: Des Appl2011; 225: 182–194.
17.
GrujicicMHeTPanduranganB. Development and parameterization of an equilibrium material model for segmented polyurea. Multidisc Model Mater Struct2011; 7: 96–114.
SamieeAAmirkhiziAVNemat-NasserS. Numerical study of the effect of polyurea on the performance of steel plates under blast loads. Mech Mater2013; 64: 1–10.
20.
AminiMRSimonJNemat-NasserS. Numerical modeling of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulsive loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments. Mech Mater2010; 42: 615–627.
21.
AminiMRIsaacsJNemat-NasserS. Investigation of effect of polyurea on response of steel plates to impulsive loads in direct pressure-pulse experiments. Mech Mater2010; 42: 628–639.
XueLMockWJr.BelytschkoT. Penetration of DH-36 steel plates with and without polyurea coating. Mech Mater2010; 42: 981–1003.
24.
El SayedTMockWJr.MotaA, et al.Computational assessment of ballistic impact on a high strength structural steel/polyurea composite plate. Comput Mech2009; 43: 525–534.
25.
ChoiTFragiadakisDRolandCM, et al.Microstructure and segmental dynamics of polyurea under uniaxial deformation. Macromolecules2012; 45: 3581–3589.
26.
Bartyczak S, Mock W, Jr., Buttler W, et al. Characterization of viscoelastic materials for low-magnitude blast mitigation. In: 18th APS-SCCM and 24th AIRAPT, pts 1-19: Journal of Physics Conference Series, Seattle, WA, USA, 2014, Vol. 500, p.182003.
27.
GrujicicMPanduranganBHeT, et al.Computational investigation of impact energy absorption capability of polyurea coatings via deformation-induced glass transition. Mater Sci Eng A2010; 527: 7741–7751.
28.
GrujicicMPanduranganBArakereG, et al.Material-modeling and structural-mechanics aspects of the traumatic brain injury problem. Multidisc Model Mater Struct2010; 6: 335–363.
29.
GrujicicMBellWCPanduranganB, et al.Fluid/structure interaction computational investigation of the blast-wave mitigation efficacy of the advanced combat helmet. J Mater Eng Perf2011; 20: 877–893.
30.
GrujicicALaBergeMGrujicicM, et al.Potential improvements in shock-mitigation efficacy of a polyurea-augmented advanced combat helmet: a computational investigation. J Mater Eng Perf2012; 21: 1562–1579.
31.
GrujicicMBellWCPanduranganB, et al.Blast-wave impact-mitigation capability of polyurea when used as helmet suspension pad material. Mater Des2010; 31: 4050–4065.
32.
GrujicicMArakereAPanduranganB, et al.Computational investigation of shock-mitigation efficacy of polyurea when used in a combat helmet: a core sample analysis. Multidisc Model Mater Struct2012; 8: 297–331.
33.
GrujicicMPanduranganBBellWC, et al.Molecular-level simulations of shock generation and propagation in polyurea. Mater Sci Eng A2011; 528: 3799–3808.
34.
GrujicicMYavariRSnipesJS, et al.Molecular-level computational investigation of shock-wave mitigation capability of polyurea. J Mater Sci2012; 47: 8197–8215.
35.
GrujicicMSnipesJSRamaswamiS, et al.Coarse-grained molecular-level analysis of polyurea properties and shock-mitigation potential. J Mater Eng Perf2013; 22: 1964–1981.
36.
GrujicicMSnipesJSRamaswamiS, et al.Meso-scale computational investigation of shock-wave attenuation by trailing release-wave in different grades of polyurea. J Mater Eng Perf2014; 23: 49–64.
37.
GrujicicMd’EntremontBPPanduranganB, et al.A study of the blast-induced brain white-matter damage and the associated diffuse axonal injury. Multidisc Model Mater Struct2012; 8: 213–245.
38.
GrujicicMd’EntremontBPPanduranganB, et al.Concept-level analysis and design of polyurea for enhanced blast-mitigation performance. J Mater Eng Perf2012; 21: 2024–2037.
39.
GrujicicMPanduranganB. Meso-scale analysis of segmental dynamics in micro-phase segregated polyurea. J Mater Sci2012; 47: 3876–3889.
40.
GrujicicMSnipesJSRamaswamiS, et al.Molecular- and domain-level microstructure dependent material model for nano-segregated polyurea. Multidisc Model Mater Struct2013; 9: 548–578.
41.
GrujicicMRamaswamiSSnipesJS, et al.Multi-scale computation-based design of nano-segregated polyurea for maximum shockwave-mitigation performance. AIMS Mater Sci2014; 1: 15–27.
42.
Walsh SM, Scott RR and Spagnuolo DM. The development of a hybrid thermoplastic ballistic material with application to helmets. Report ARL-TR-3700, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi, MD, 2005.
43.
Goel R. Study of an advanced helmet liner concept to reduce TBI: experiments & simulation using sandwich structures. MS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2011.
44.
Christou GA. Development of a helmet liner for protection against blast induced trauma. MS Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2010.
45.
WojcikBESteinCRBaggK, et al.Traumatic brain injury hospitalization of U.S. army soldiers deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq. Am J Preventive Med2010; 38: S108–S116.
46.
HolmLCassidyJDCarrollLJ, et al.Neurotrauma task force on mild traumatic brain injury of the WHO collaborating centre: summary of the WHO collaborating centre for neurotrauma task force on mild traumatic brain injury. J Rehab Med2005; 37: 131–141.
47.
TaberKHWardenDLHurleyRA. Blast-related traumatic brain injury: what is known?J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci2006; 18: 141–145.
48.
CernakIWangZJiangJ, et al.Ultrastructural and functional characteristics of blast injury-induced neurotrauma. J Trauma Injury Infection Critical Care2001; 50: 695–706.
49.
ZhuFWagnerCLeonardiADC, et al.Using a gel/plastic surrogate to study the biomechanical response of the head under air shock loading: a combined experimental and numerical investigation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2012; 11: 341–353.
50.
VarasJMPhilippensMMeijerSR, et al.Physics of IED blast shock tube simulations for mTBI research. Front Neurol2011; 2: article 58–58. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2011.00058.
51.
LockhartPCroninDWilliamsK, et al.Investigation of head response to loading. J Trauma2011; 70: E29–E36.
52.
GanpuleSAlaiAPlougonvenE, et al.Mechanics of blast loading on the head models in the study of traumatic brain injury using experimental and computational approaches. Biomech Model Mechanobiol2013; 12: 511–513.
53.
RobertsJCHarriganTPWardEE, et al.Human head-neck computational model for assessing blast injury. J Biomech2012; 45: 2899–2906.
54.
ShridharaniJKWoodGWPanzerMB, et al.Porcine head response to blast. Front Neurol2012; 3: 1–12.
55.
MossWCKingMJBlackmanEG. Skull flexure from blast waves: a mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet designs. J Acoust Soc Am2009; 125: 2650–2667.
56.
TaylorPAFordCC. Simulation of blast-induced early-time intra-cranial wave physics leading to traumatic brain injury. J Biomech Eng2009; 131: 061007–061007.
57.
Sharma S and Zhang L. Prediction of intra-cranial responses from blast induced neurotrauma using a validated finite element model of human head. In: Ohio state university injury biomechanics symposium, Columbus, OH, USA, 2011.
58.
Littlestone A, Dudt P and Knight D. Development of traumatic brain injury criteria from blast tests on instrumented manikins – progress report. Report NSWCCD-66-TR-2010/36, Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, Carderock, MD, USA, 2010.
59.
IvancevicVG. New mechanics of traumatic brain injury. Cognit Neurodyn2009; 3: 281–293.
60.
Dassault Systemès. ABAQUS, version 6.14EF-1, user documentation, 2014.
61.
Altair Engineering, Inc. Hypermesh, HyperWorks 10.0, 2010.
62.
Nyein MK. Computational modeling of primary blast effects on the human brain. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 2013.
63.
GrujicicMSnipesJSChandrasekharanN. Computational analysis of fluid-structure interaction based blast-mitigation effects. J Mater: Des Appl2013; 227: 124–142.
64.
Hyde D. User’s guide for microcomputer programs, CONWEP and FUNPRO – applications of TM 5-855-1. Report, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1988.
65.
GrujicicMSnipesJSChandrasekharanN, et al.Computational assessment of the blast-mitigation efficacy of an air-vacated protective-buffer concept. Multidisc Model Mater Struct2013; 9: 218–242.
66.
GrujicicMSnipesJSChandrasekharanN. Fluid-structure interaction computational analysis of a piston-cylinder based blast-wave mitigation concept. Multidisc Model Mater Struct2012; 8: 524–553.
67.
GrujicicAGrujicicMSnipesJS, et al.Material modeling and finite-element analysis of active-contractile and passive responses of smooth muscle tissue. Rev Bioinfo Biomet2013; 2: 45–64.
68.
Greer AD. Numerical modeling for the prediction of primary blast injury to the lung. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, Canada, 2006.
69.
HirschACurrent problems in head protection. In: CavenessWWalkerA (eds). Head injury conference proceedings, Philadelphia: Lippincott Company, 1966, pp. 37–40.
