In reality, a pendulum structure can be used to model many real structures as a ropeway carrier, crane, balloon basket or ships in waves, etc, which often hung on moving points such as cables, wavefronts and balloons, etc. To the best knowledge of the author, however, there is no study to control oscillation of the pendulum structure excited by the hanging point. Therefore, this article deals with the oscillation control of the pendulum structure by using an inverted pendulum-type tuned mass damper, in which the system is subjected to the motion of the hanging point. In particular, the optimal parameters are determined in clear analytical solutions, making it easy for scientists to determine the optimal parameters to suppress the oscillation for the pendulum structure.
FarshidianfarAEbrahimiMRahnejatH,et al.Optimization of the high-frequency torsional vibration of vehicle driveline systems using genetic algorithms. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2002; 216: 249–262.
2.
De la CruzMTheodossiadesSRahnejatH. An investigation of manual transmission drive rattle. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2010; 224: 167–181.
3.
GnanakumarrMTheodossiadesSRahnejatH,et al.Impact-induced vibration in vehicular driveline systems: theoretical and experimental investigations. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2005; 219: 1–12.
4.
MehdigoliHRahnejatHGoharR. Vibration response of wavy surfaced disc in elastohydrodynamic rolling contact. Wear1990; 139: 1–15.
5.
LynaghNRahnejatHEbrahimiM, et al.Bearing induced vibration in precision high speed routing spindles. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2000; 40: 561–577.
6.
VafaeiSRahnejatHAiniR. Vibration monitoring of high speed spindles using spectral analysis techniques. Int J Mach Tools Manuf2002; 42: 1223–1234.
7.
ChinhND. Determination of optimal parameters of the tuned mass damper to reduce the torsional vibration of the shaft by using the principle of minimum kinetic energy. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2019; 233: 327–335.
8.
ChinhND. Design of the symmetric tuned mass damper for torsional vibration control of the rotating shaft. Noise Vib Worldw2021; 52: 212–221.
9.
WongWOCheungYL. Optimal design of a damped dynamic vibration absorber for vibration control of structure excited by ground motion. Eng Struct2008; 30: 282–286.
10.
ColherinhasGBShzuMAMAvilaSM,et al.Wind tower vibration controlled by a pendulum TMD using genetic optimization: beam modelling. Procedia Eng2017; 199: 1623–1628.
11.
ColherinhasGBMoraisMVGShzuMAM,et al.Optimal pendulum tuned mass damper design applied to high towers using genetic algorithms: two-DOF modeling 2019. Int J Struct Stab Dyn2019; 19: 1950125.
12.
DeraemaekerASoltaniP. A short note on equal peak design for the pendulum tuned mass dampers. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2017; 231: 285–291.
13.
GergesRRVickeryBJ. Optimum design of pendulum-type tuned mass dampers. Struct Des Tall Spec Build2005; 14: 353–368.
14.
ShuZLiSSunX,et al.Performance-based seismic design of a pendulum tuned mass damper system. J Earthquake Eng2017; 23: 334–355.
15.
ZhanSShuangLJianZ,et al.Optimum seismic design of a power plant building with pendulum tuned mass damper system by its heavy suspended buckets. Eng Struct2017; 136: 114–132.
16.
ChinhND. Vibration control of a rotating shaft by passive mass-spring-disc dynamic vibration absorber. Arc Mech Eng2020; 67: 279–297.
17.
PhucVDVanTTQuyenNV. A novel design of the dynamic vibration absorbers for damped main systems under torsional excitation using least squares estimation of the equivalent linearization method. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2018; 233: 60–70.
18.
ChinhND. Optimal parameters of tuned mass dampers for an inverted pendulum with two degrees of freedom. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2021; 235: 281–293.
19.
MatsuhisaHGuRWangY,et al.Vibration control of a ropeway carrier by passive dynamic vibration absorbers. JSME Int J C1995; 38: 657–662.
20.
VietLDAnhNDMatsuhisaH. Vibration control of a pendulum structure by a dynamic vibration absorber moving in both normal and tangential directions. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci2011; 225: 1087–1095.
21.
VietLD. Sequential design of two orthogonal dynamic vibration absorbers in a pendulum based on stability maximization. Proc Inst Mech EngPart C: J Mech Eng Sci2012; 226: 2645–2655.
22.
WarburtonGB. Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam1982; 10: 381–401.
23.
RobertsJBSpanosPD. Random vibration and statistical linearization. Chichester, New York: Wiley, 1990.
24.
SoongTTGrigoriuM. Random vibration of mechanical and structural systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: PTR Prentice Hall, 1993.
25.
PreumontA. Random vibration and spectral analysis. Dordrecht, United States: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
