A study of a rover wheel for Martian explorations,based on a flexible multibody approach

Abstract

Vehicles for planetary exploration have to operate in completely different environments from Earth. For this reason, the design process of the exploration unit has an important role and can affect the requirements of the entire mission for the different space agencies involved. These operations are very expensive and time consuming, so that, over the years, ad hoc CAE methods have been developed to help engineers in the design stage. These methods are used to simulate several working conditions, evaluating which manoeuvres robots can safely perform during their mission. In this framework, a study was performed by Politecnico di Torino and Thales Alenia Space Italia. The goal was to find an efficient way to implement flexibility properties of a special wheel of a Rover for Martian explorations in a commercial (general purpose) MTB code. The ExoMars Rover was considered as case study of this work. When dealing with manoeuvres feasibility analysis, the best compromise between solution accuracy and computational time required must be found. The aim of this study was to explore pros and cons of several techniques which could allow modelling a complex flexible wheel using a commercial general-purpose MTB code. The absolute nodal coordinate formulation was compared with the other reduced-order modelling strategies proposed by the authors to implement the flexibility of a wheel in a multibody model of the full vehicle. Numerical results show good performance of the reduced morphing model in terms of computational time versus numerical accuracy.

Keywords

Flexible multibody absolute nodal coordinate formulation planetary rover flexible wheel vehicle dynamics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Patel N, Ellery A, Allouis E, et al. Rover Mobility Performance Evaluation Tool (RMPET): a systematic tool for Rover CHASSIS evaluation via application of Bekker Theory. In: 8th ESA Work Advanced Space Technologies in Robot Automation 2004, pp.1–8.

Jain A, Guineau J, Lim C, et al. Roams: planetary surface rover simulation environment. In: Symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space (i-SAIRAS 2003), Nara, Japan, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.143.2739 (2003, accessed 12 February 2011).

Yen J, Jain A and Balaram J. ROAMS: Rover analysis modeling and simulation. In: 5th international symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space (i-SAIRAS), pp.1–3.

Grand C, Amar FB, Plumet F, et al. Simulation and control of high mobility rovers for rough terrains exploration. In: Proceedings of the IARP international workshop on humanitarian demining, p.1.

Grand C, Amar B and Bidaud P. A simulation system for behaviour evaluation of off-road mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on climbing and walking robotics, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2001, pp.307–314.

Madsen J, Seidl A and Negrut D. Off-road vehicle dynamics mobility simulation with a compaction based deformable terrain model. In: Proceedings of the ASME design engineering technical conference, 4–7 August 2013, Portland, Oregon, USA. DOI: 10.1115/DETC2013-13152.

Bauer

Barfoot

Leung

, et al. Dynamic simulation tool development for planetary rovers. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2008; 5: 31–31.

Bauer R, Leung W and Barfoot T. Development of a dynamic simulation tool for the exomars rover. In: Proceedings of The 8th International Symposium on Artifical Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space – iSAIRAS, Munich, Germany, 2005.

AESCO. Matlab/Simulink Module AESCO Soft Soil Tyre Model (AS2TM) User’s Guide.

10.

Schäfer

Gibbesch

. Planetary rover mobility: wheel-soil interaction based on multibody system approach. IFAC Proc Vol 2007; 40: 883–888.

11.

Schäfer

Gibbesch

Krenn

, et al. Planetary rover mobility simulation on soft and uneven terrain. Veh Syst Dyn 2010; 48: 149–169.

12.

Zhou

Arvidson

Bennett

, et al. Simulations of Mars rover traverses. J F Robot 2014; 31: 141–160.

13.

Yang

Bao

Jin

, et al. A virtual simulation environment for lunar rover: framework and key technologies. Int J Adv Robot Syst 2008; 5: 16–16.

14.

Nicolini

Mocera

Somà

. Multibody simulation of a tracked vehicle with deformable ground contact model. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics 2018; 233: 152–162.

15.

Mocera

Nicolini

. Multibody simulation of a small size farming tracked vehicle. Proc Struct Integr 2018; 8: 118–125.

16.

Bosso N and Zampieri N. Experimental and numerical simulation of wheel-rail adhesion and wear using a scaled roller rig and a real-time contact code. Epub ahead of print 22 February 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/385018.

17.

Bosso N, Spiryagin M, Gugliotta A, et al. Mechatronic modeling of real-time wheel-rail contact. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. Epub ahead of print 1 August 2013. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-36246-0.

18.

Bosso

Zampieri

. Real-time implementation of a traction control algorithm on a scaled roller rig. Veh Syst Dyn 2013; 51: 517–541.

19.

Shabana

. Flexible multibody dynamics: review of past and recent developments. Multibody Syst Dyn 1997; 1: 189–222.

20.

Gerstmayr

Sugiyama

Mikkola

. Review on the absolute nodal coordinate formulation for large deformation analysis of multibody systems. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 2013; 8: 31012–31016.

21.

Shabana

Yakoub

. Three dimensional absolute nodal coordinate formulation for beam elements: theory. J Mech Des 2000; 123: 606–613.

22.

Shabana

. Finite element incremental approach and exact rigid body inertia. J Mech Des 1996; 118: 171–178.

23.

Schiehlen

. Multibody system dynamics: roots and perspectives. Multibody Syst Dyn 1997; 1: 149–188.

24.

Schiehlen

. Computational dynamics: theory and applications of multibody systems. Eur J Mech – A/Solids 2006; 25: 566–594.

25.

Luo

Liu

, et al. Model order reduction for dynamic simulation of a flexible multibody system via absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2017; 324: 573–594.

26.

Dmitrochenko

. Finite elements using absolute nodal coordinates for large-deformation flexible multibody dynamics. J Comput Appl Math 2008; 215: 368–377.

27.

Valkeapää

Matikainen

Mikkola

. Meshing strategies in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation-based Euler–Bernoulli beam elements. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics 2015; 230: 606–614.