In this study, a new method to improve ride comfort, vehicle handling, and workspace was presented in multi-objective optimization using nonlinear asymmetrical dampers. The main aim of this research was to provide suitable passive suspension based on more efficiency and the low cost of the mentioned dampers. Using the model with five degrees of freedom, suspension system parameters were optimized under sinusoidal road excitation. The main functions of the suspension system were chosen as objective functions. In order to better illustrate the impact of each objective functions on the suspension parameters, at first two-objective and finally five-objective were considered in the optimization problem. The obtained results indicated that the optimized viscous coefficients for five-objective optimization lead to 3.58% increase in ride comfort, 0.74% in vehicle handling ability, and 2.20% in workspace changes for the average of forward and rear suspension.
ChenJSHwangHY. Engine automatic start–stop dynamic analysis and vibration reduction for a two-mode hybrid vehicle. Proc IMechE, Part D: J Automobile Engineering2013; 227: 1303–1312.
2.
YauJD. Aerodynamic vibrations of a maglev vehicle running on flexible guide ways under oncoming wind actions. J Sound Vib2010; 329: 1743–1759.
3.
ISO 2631. International standard organization mechanical vibration and shock. Geneva: ISO.
4.
GillespieTD. Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics, 1st ed. USA: Society of automotive engineers, 1992, pp. 309–332.
5.
Von ChappuisHMavrosGKingPD. Prediction of impulsive vehicle tyre-suspension response to abusive drive-over-kerb manoeuvres. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2013; 227: 133–149.
6.
GündoğduÖ9. Optimal seat and suspension design for a quarter car with driver model using genetic algorithms. Int J Ind Ergonom2007; 37: 327–332.
7.
SunLCaiXYangJ. Genetic algorithm-based optimum vehicle suspension design using minimum dynamic pavement load as a design criterion. J Sound Vib2007; 301: 18–27.
8.
BadranSSalahAAbbasW. Design of optimal linear suspension for quarter car with human model using genetic algorithms. Res Bull Jordan ACM2012; 11: 42–51.
9.
GogaVKľúčikM. Optimization of vehicle suspension parameters with use of evolutionary computation. Procedia Eng2012; 48: 174–179.
10.
TamboliJJoshiS. Optimum design of a passive suspension system of a vehicle subjected to actual random road excitations. J Sound Vib1999; 219: 193–205.
11.
MirzaeiMHassannejadR. Application of genetic algorithms to optimum design of elasto-damping elements of a half-car model under random road excitations. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2007; 221: 515–526.
12.
BaumalAMcPheeJCalamaiP. Application of genetic algorithms to the design optimization of an active vehicle suspension system. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng1998; 163: 87–94.
13.
MarzbanradJMohammadiMMostaaniS. Optimization of a passive vehicle suspension system for ride comfort enhancement with different speeds based on design of experiment DOE method. J Mech Eng Res2013; 5: 50–59.
14.
ShirahattiAPrasadPPanzadeP. Optimal design of passenger car suspension for ride and road holding. J Brazil Soc Mech Sci Eng2008; 30: 66–76.
15.
Seifi A, Hassannejad R and Hamed MA. Optimum design for passive suspension system of a vehicle to prevent rollover and improve ride comfort under random road excitations. Proc IMechEng, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1464419315618034.
16.
HegazySRahnejatHHussainK. Multi-body dynamics in full-vehicle handling analysis. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics1999; 213: 19–31.
17.
Tyan F, Hong YF, Tu SH, et al. Generation of random road profiles. CSME, 2004, pp.1373–1378.
18.
Hongbin R, Sizhong C and Zhicheng W. Model of excitation of random road profile in time domain for a vehicle with four wheels. In: IEE international conference on mechatronic science, electric engineering and computer (MEC), Jilin, 2011, pp.2332–2335.
19.
PesterevAVBergmanLATanCA. A novel approach to the calculation of pothole-induced contact forces in MDOF vehicle models. J Sound Vib2004; 275: 127–149.
20.
SharpRSCrollaDA. Road vehicle suspension system design- a review. Veh Syst Dyn1987; 16: 167–192.
21.
AzmanMKingPDRahnejatH. Combined bounce, pitch, and roll dynamics of vehicles negotiating single speed bump events. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2007; 221: 33–40.
22.
Von ChappuisHMavrosGKingPD. Prediction of impulsive vehicle tyre-suspension response to abusive drive-over-kerb manoeuvres. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2013; 227: 133–149.
23.
KhajaviMNNotghiBPayganeG. A multi objective optimization approach to optimize vehicle ride and handling characteristics. Int J Mech Aerosp Ind Mechatron Manuf Eng2010; 4: 502–506.
24.
Han BJ, Gang XN, Wan CY, et al. Multi-objective optimization design of passive suspension parameters based on collusion cooperation game theory. In: IEE world congress on intelligent control and automation (WCICA), Jinan, 2010, pp.118–125.
25.
JamaliAShamsHFasihozamanM. Pareto multi-objective optimum design of vehicle-suspension system under random road excitations. Proc IMechE, Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics2014; 228: 282–293.
26.
Nariman-ZadehNSalehpourMJamaliA. Pareto optimization of a five-degree of freedom vehicle vibration model using a multi-objective uniform-diversity genetic algorithm (MUGA). Eng Appl Artif Intell2010; 23: 543–551.
27.
ShojaeefardMHKhalkhaliASafarpour ErfaniP. Multi-objective suspension optimization of a 5-DOF vehicle vibration model excited by random road profile. J Adv Des Manuf Technol2014; 7: 1–7.
28.
SharifiMShahriariB. Pareto optimization of vehicle suspension vibration for a nonlinear half-car model using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Res J Recent Sci2012; 1: 17–22.
29.
MahmoodabadiMJAdljooy SafaieABagheriA. A novel combination of Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithm for Pareto optimal design of a five-degree of freedom vehicle vibration model. Appl Soft Comput2013; 13: 2577–2591.
30.
SilveiraMPontesBRJrBalthazarJM. Use of nonlinear asymmetrical shock absorber to improve comfort on passenger vehicles. J Sound Vib2014; 333: 2114–2129.
31.
Happian-SmithJ. An introduction to modern vehicle design, London: Elsevier, 2001.
32.
GiuaAMelasMSeatzuC. Design of a predictive semi-active suspension system. Int J Veh Mech Mobil2004; 41: 277–300.
33.
DebKPratapAAgarwalS. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput2002; 6: 182–197.
34.
SrinivasNDebK. Multi-objective optimization using non-dominated sorting in genetic algorithms. J Evolut Comput1994; 2: 221–248.
