Multibody modelling of a TB31 and a TB32 crash test with vertical portable concrete barriers: Model verification and sensitivity analysis

Abstract

In this article the multibody simulation software package MADYMO for analysing and optimizing occupant safety design was used to model crash tests for Normal Containment barriers in accordance with EN 1317. The verification process was carried out by simulating a TB31 and a TB32 crash test performed on vertical portable concrete barriers and by comparing the numerical results to those obtained experimentally. The same modelling approach was applied to both tests to evaluate the predictive capacity of the modelling at two different impact speeds. A sensitivity analysis of the vehicle stiffness was also carried out. The capacity to predict all of the principal EN1317 criteria was assessed for the first time: the acceleration severity index, the theoretical head impact velocity, the barrier working width and the vehicle exit box. Results showed a maximum error of 6% for the acceleration severity index and 21% for theoretical head impact velocity for the numerical simulation in comparison to the recorded data. The exit box position was predicted with a maximum error of 4°. For the working width, a large percentage difference was observed for test TB31 due to the small absolute value of the barrier deflection but the results were well within the limit value from the standard for both tests. The sensitivity analysis showed the robustness of the modelling with respect to contact stiffness increase of ±20% and ±40%. This is the first multibody model of portable concrete barriers that can reproduce not only the acceleration severity index but all the test criteria of EN 1317 and is therefore a valuable tool for new product development and for injury biomechanics research.

Keywords

Roadside safety barriers TB31 crash test TB32 crash test multibody model MADYMO portable concrete barriers sensitivity analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berg FA, Rücker P, König J, et al. Motorcycle impacts into roadside barriers – real-world accident studies, crash tests and simulations carried out in Germany and Australia. In: 19th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Washington, DC, USA, 6–9 June, 2005, paper no. 05-0095.

Ibitoye

Radin

Hamouda

. Roadside barrier and passive safety of motorcyclists along exclusive motorcycle lanes. J Eng Sci Technol 2007; 2: 1–20.

Troutbeck R, Barker T and Thambiratnam D. Roadside barrier design and vehicle occupant safety. Road safety research grant T2000/0736. Final report, School of Civil Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane QLD 4001: Australian Transport Safety Bureau, GPO Box 967, Canberra Act 2608, 2001, p. 32.

Carvalho

Ambrosio

. Development of generic road vehicle multibody models for crash analysis using an optimisation approach. Int J Crashworthiness 2011; 16: 537–556.

Laker I. MIRA Test F203. The impact of a 1.5 tonne Rover SD1 car into a portable vertical concrete barrier at 20°. MIRA test. Motor Industry Research Association MIRA, 1989.

Clarke CS. MIRA Test M0044. Composite test report for test number M0044, 1.5t car/113km/h impact speed/20° impact angle impacting temporary vertical concrete barrier (non standard washers). MIRA test. Transport Research Laboratory TRL, 1994.

FHWA/NHTSA National Crash Analysis Center. http://www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html (2008, accessed 5 February 2013).

Bixel RA, Garrott WR, Guenther DA, et al. Measured vehicle inertial parameters-NHTSA's data through November 1998. SAE paper 1999-01-1336, 2000.

Jiang

Grezbieta

. Predicting impact loads of a car crashing into a concrete roadside safety barrier. Int J Crashworthiness 2004; 9: 45–63.

10.

Wood

Adamson

Ydenius

. Car frontal collisions: occupant compartment forces, interface forces and stiffnesses. Int J Crashworthiness 2004; 9: 311–325.

11.

Jiang T, Grzebieta RH, Rechnitzer G, et al. Review of car frontal stiffness equations for estimating vehicle impact velocities. In: 18th international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, Nagoya, Japan, 19–22 May 2003. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, p. 11.

12.

Marzougui

Bahouth

Eskandarian

. Evaluation of portable concrete barriers using finite element simulation. Transportation Research Record: J Transportation Res Board 2000; 17(20): 1–6.

13.

ECFN CEN. BS EN 1317-2:2010. Road restraint systems. Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers including vehicle parapets, BSI, 2010, p. 32.

14.

Bolarinwa EO, Mahadevaiah U, Marzougui D, et al. The development of an enhanced finite element tire model for roadside safety hardware assessment. Proc IMechE Part K: J Multi-body Dynamics 2012; 226(3): 206--219.

15.

Reid

Faller

. New test level 2 rough stone masonry guardwall. Transportation Research Record 2195, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 2010, pp. 85–94.

16.

Amato G, O’Brien F, Simms C, et al. Development of roadside safety barriers using natural building materials. In: ITRN – Irish Transport Research network annual conference, Cork, 31 August–1 September 2011, paper no. 132.