The environment shapes the foundation of healthy development and learning. The aim of this colloquium is to share the authors’ recent research efforts to center children as necessary codesign partners in their built learning environments. To do this, the authors believe that it is important to reposition preschool inclusion as a bottom-up, or micro-driven, practice that begins with the child. This ecological shift acknowledges children as able-bodied, dynamic individuals who move in multiple ways and can contribute to decision-making conversations.
BartonEESmithBJ (2015) Advancing high-quality preschool inclusion: A discussion and recommendations for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education35(2): 69–78.
2.
BjögvinssonEEhnPHillgrenA (2012) Design things and design thinking: Contemporary participatory design challenges. Design Issues28(3): 101–116.
3.
CarrollJMRossonMB (2007) Participatory design in community informatics. Design Studies28(3): 243–261.
ClarkA (2001) How to listen to very young children: The Mosaic approach. Child Care in Practice7(4): 333–341.
6.
ClarkAMossP (2005) Spaces to Play: More Listening to Young Children Using the Mosaic Approach. London: National Children’s Bureau.
7.
ConstantinAKorteJFailsJA, et al. (2019) Pushing the boundaries of participatory design with children with special needs. In: IDC ’19: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on interaction design and children, Boise, ID, 12–15 June 2019, pp. 697–705. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
8.
DruinA (2014) Inclusive ownership of participatory learning. Instructional Science42: 123–126.
9.
FarberADruinAChipmanG, et al. (2002) How young can our design partners be?Technical report, Human–Computer Interaction Lab, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, September.
10.
FrauenbergerCSpielKScheepmakerL, et al. (2019) Nurturing constructive disagreement: Agnostic design with neurodiverse children. In: CHI ’19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Glasgow,4–9 May 2019, Paper no. 271. New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
11.
GelderblomH (2017) Co-designing an HCI curriculum with college students and teaching them about participatory design in the process. In: DiSalvoBYipJBonsignoreE, et al. (eds) Participatory Design for Learning. New York: Routledge, pp. 71–88.
12.
GuhaMLDruinAChipmanG, et al. (2004) Mixing ideas: A new technique for working with young children as design partners. In: IDC ’04: Proceedings of the 2004 conference on interaction design and children: Building a community, MD, 1–3 June 2004, pp. 35–42.New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
13.
GuhaMLDruinAFailsJA (2008) Designing with and for children with special needs: An inclusionary model. In: IDC ’08: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on interaction design and children, Chicago, IL, 11–13 June 2008, pp. 61–64.New York:Association for Computing Machinery.
14.
GuhaMLDruinAFailsJA (2013) Cooperative inquiry revisited: Reflections of the past and guidelines for the future of intergenerational co-design. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction1(1): 14–23.
HourcadeJPPantojaLSDeiderichK, et al. (2017) The 3 Cs for preschool children’s technology: Create, connect, community. Interactions24(4): 70–73.
17.
KleminJ (2022) My parents are hackers out of necessity. New York Times, 25 September. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/25/opinion/skateboarding-disability-hacks.html
18.
KyzaENicolaidoiI (2017) Co-designing reform-based online inquiry learning environments as a situated approach to teachers’ professional development. CoDesign13(4): 261–286.
19.
MellesGHowardZThompson-WhitesideS (2012) Teaching design thinking: Expanding horizons in design education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences31: 162–166.
20.
MerterSHasirciD (2017) A participatory product design process with children with autism spectrum disorder. CoDesign14(3): 170–187.
21.
NagasawaMK (2020) An “old fight”: A case study of enduring struggle in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 21(3): 224–241.
22.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child (2023) Place matters: The environment we create shapes the foundations of healthy development. Working Paper 16, Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, March. Available at: https://developingchild.harvard.edu/place-matters-the-environment-we-create-shapes-the-foundations-of-healthy-development/
23.
OdomSLVitzumJWoleryR, et al. (2004) Preschool inclusion in the United States: A review of research from an ecological systems perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs4(1): 17–49.
24.
RazzoukRShuteV (2012) What is design thinking and why is it important?Review of Educational Research82(3): 330–348.
25.
SandersEBNStappersPJ (2008) Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign4(1): 5–18.
Van der HelmAWKeysonD (2008) Experience design for interactive products: Designing technology augmented urban playgrounds for girls. PsychNology6(2): 173–188.
30.
YoonHSTempletonTN (2019) The practice of listening to children: The challenges of hearing children out in an adult-regulated world. Harvard Educational Review89(1): 55–84.
