Abstract

Before providing an overview of the contents of this issue, I would like to thank those dedicated professionals who reviewed articles for the journal during 2014. The quality of articles published is directly connected to the feedback authors receive from reviewers. Our sincere thanks go to those listed at the end of this editorial – we acknowledge you!
The acceptance rate for Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood (CIEC) continues to be competitive. The table below indicates the acceptance rates from 2000 and shows that it was a little easier to have an article accepted in 2014 than it was in 2013.
This issue of the journal covers a wide range of topics, and includes a variety of methodological and theoretical approaches. The first article by Margaret Somerville and Carolyn Williams provides an updated review (2009–2013) of sustainability research in early childhood education. The analysis found that the number of articles published since the previous review had doubled. More thought-provoking, however, is the lack of methodological and theoretical rigour associated with many studies. The research was classified into three discourses, with research in the Connection to nature discourse lacking theoretical rigour due to unexamined assumptions, and research in the Children’s rights discourse focused on advocacy approaches, which precluded empirical evidence that could be used for practice. Research analysed in the third discourse, Post-human frameworks, was theoretically rigorous but disconnected from education for sustainability. This timely analysis sets a clear direction for future research relating to sustainability in early childhood education.
Young children’s mathematical activity and beliefs about mathematics prior to school is an area that has received little research attention. The second article by Jamie L Wernet and Julie Nurnberger-Haag used a case study to investigate one young child’s mathematical activity and beliefs prior to attending school. The researchers used a framework that viewed mathematics as a cultural activity to show how the focus child, Olivia, associated mathematics solely with writing numbers and letters. Despite her everyday engagement with mathematics and sophisticated mathematical thinking, activities such as map-making were precluded from what Olivia understood as mathematics. The insights from this research provide thinking points about mathematics for all those involved with young children in before-school contexts.
In the third article, Digital literacy practices and pedagogical moments: Human and non-human intertwining in early childhood education, Tove Lafton uses a combination of actor network theory (ANT) and Foucauldian understandings of discourse as a way to explore digital literacy practices in three Norwegian kindergartens. Lafton shows pedagogical moments that engage both human and non-human agency and argues that seeing agency as fluid requires more skills of children than simply connecting with adult knowledge. In a challenge to some current ideas about concepts of love, care and maternalism (Getting behind discourses of love, care and maternalism in early childhood education), Teresa A Aslanian considers how the historical development of these discourses affects professional understandings. She proposes that the field has a greater responsibility to reflect on these discourses, the aim of which is to comprehend the relationship between early childhood pedagogy and love, and therefore the ways in which children’s need for love can be provided in early childhood institutions.
Articles five and six engage in analysis of policies from two different countries. Donald Simpson and Rose Envy tackle the neoliberal discourse of ‘the new politics of parenting’ in England in an article titled Subsidizing early childhood education and care for parents on low income: Moving beyond the individualized economic rationale of neoliberalism. They use a case study and draw examples from four mothers to question the assumption that national and local subsidization of early childhood education can reduce susceptibility to low income. The complexity of the circumstances confronting these mothers provides good reasons for moving beyond assessing the provision of childcare in purely economic terms. The final article for this issue: Performativity, propriety and productivity: The unintended consequences of investing in the Early Years is by Kym Macfarlane and Ali Lakhani, who provide a policy analysis of a document that sets the direction for investing in the early years in Australia until 2020. Drawing on a range of theoretical and policy perspectives, the authors argue that because the policy associates healthy and proper child development with economic productivity and national goals, it has the potential to widen the social inequalities and health disparities it seeks to remedy.
The colloquium titled Reflections on foreign languages in Tunisian preschools comes from Mohamed Ridha Ben Maad. Thanks to Tanya Morin who reviewed the book Critical literacy in the early childhood classroom: Unpacking histories, unlearning privilege.
I hope you enjoy this issue and thanks again to those who reviewed for the journal in 2014, the editorial board members, and to those who reviewed books and provided colloquia.
Our thanks to the following reviewers of articles in 2014.
