Anthropological accounts struggle to incorporate both subjectivity and supra-personal structures. Focus on the shape and type of relations neglects giving attention to the transformations that emerge as a result of relationships. This article proposes a toolbox of concepts that re-specify the notion of relations in a way that takes into account the transformative effect of relationships. The concepts are force fields, vectors, direction-of-attention and unprotected backs. These notions incorporate directionality and transformation into the notion of relations and provide three key understandings of i) shifts in personal effectiveness; ii) the limitations of personal power without undermining the subject; and iii) intentionality without undermining the effectiveness of structures. Each of these understandings is illustrated by means of the strivings of environmental activists members of a transnational environmentalist federation. Vectors make it possible to take seriously the subject and inter-subjective sociality and, simultaneously, the effects of history and impersonal structures.
Bird-DavidN (1994) Sociality and immediacy: Or, past and present conversations on bands. Man (n.s.)29(3): 583–603.
2.
BlokAJensenTE (2011) Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World, London: Routledge.
3.
BourdieuP (1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society14(6): 723–744.
4.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
5.
BonnesMSecchiaroliG (1995) Environmental Psychology: A Psycho-social Introduction, London: SAGE.
6.
CarrithersM (1990) Why humans have cultures. Man25: 189–206.
7.
ChalmersD (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
DohertyB (2006) Friends of the Earth International: Negotiating a North–South identity. Environmental Politics15(5): 860–880.
9.
DurkheimE (1957 [1915]) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life, London: George Allen & Unwin.
10.
DurkheimE (1973) The dualism of human nature and its social conditions. In: BellahR (eds) On Morality and Society, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 149–163.
11.
EscobarA (2008) Territories of Difference: Place, Movement, Life, Redes, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
12.
FarnellB (2000) Getting out of the habitus. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute6(3): 397–418.
13.
FeldmanG (2011) If ethnography is more than participant observation, then relations are more than connections: The case for non-local ethnography in a world of apparatuses. Anthropological Theory11(4): 375–395.
14.
FoucaultM (1979) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York: Pantheon.
15.
FoucaultM (1988) Technologies of the self. In: MartinL (eds) Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault, Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
16.
GattC (2010) Serial closure: Generative reflexivity and restoring confidence in/of anthropologists. In: KeornerSRusselI (eds) Unquiet Pasts: Risk Society, Lived Cultural Heritage and Re-designing Reflexivity, Farnham: Ashgate.
17.
Gatt C (2011) By way of theatre: Design anthropology and the exploration of human possibilities. Conference Proceedings, ‘Participatory Innovation Conference’, University of Southern Denmark. Available at: http://spirewire.sdu.dk/PINC-proceedings-web.pdf.
18.
GattC (2013) Enlivening the supra-personal actor: Vectors at work in a transnational environmentalist federation. Anthropology in Action20(2): 17–27.
19.
GattCIngoldT (2013) From description to correspondence: Anthropology in real time. In: GunnWOttoTSmithR (eds) Design Anthropology: Juxtaposing Theory and Practice, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
20.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures, London: Fontana Press.
21.
GellA (1998) Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
GibsonJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
23.
GiddensA (2009 [1984]) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Cambridge: Polity Press.
24.
GiddensA (2008 [1991]) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge: Polity Press.
25.
GiddensA (2007 [1994]) Living in a post-traditional society. In: BeckUGiddensALashS (eds) Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Cambridge: Polity Press.
26.
GleickJ (1998 [1987]) Chaos: Making a New Science, London: Vintage.
27.
GrimshawAHartK (1995) The rise and fall of scientific ethnography. In: AhmedAShoreC (eds) The Future of Anthropology, London: Athlone Press, pp. 46–64.
28.
GuptaA (1995) Blurred boundaries: The discourse of corruption, the culture of politics, and the imagined state. American Ethnologist22(2): 375–402.
29.
HackingI (1986) Making up people. In: HellerT (eds) Reconstructing Individualism, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
30.
HannerzU (1996) Transnational Connections: Culture, People and Places, New York: Routledge.
31.
HarawayD (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, London: Free Association Books Ltd.
32.
HatchE (1973) Theories of Man and Culture, New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
HeftH (2001) Ecological Psychology in Context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the Legacy of William James’s Radical Empiricism, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
HobbesT (2008 [1996]) Leviathan, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
IngoldT (1992) Culture and the perception of the environment. In: CrollEParkinD (eds) Bush Base: Forest Farm, London: Routledge.
37.
IngoldT (1993) The art of translation in a continuous world. In: PálssonG (eds) Beyond Boundaries: Understanding, Translation and Anthropological Discourse, Oxford: Berg.
38.
IngoldT (1996) The concept of society is theoretically obsolete. In: IngoldT (eds) Key Debates in Anthropology, London: Routledge.
39.
IngoldT (1999) Human nature and science. Interdisciplinary Science Review24(4): 250–254.
40.
IngoldT (2000) The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill, New York: Routledge.
41.
IngoldT (2005) Epilogue: Towards a politics of dwelling. Conservation and Society3(2): 501–508.
42.
IngoldT (2007a) Lines: A Brief History, London: Routledge.
43.
Ingold T (2007b) Anthropology is not ethnography. Radcliffe-Brown Lecture at the British Academy.
44.
IngoldT (2008a) Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A40(8): 1796–1810.
45.
IngoldT (2008b) When ANT meets SPIDER: Social theory for arthropods. In: KnappettCMalafourisL (eds) Material Agency: Towards a Non-Anthropocentric Approach, New York: Springer.
46.
Ingold T (2009) No more ancient; no more human: The future past of archaeology and anthropology. Keynote speech presented to the Conference of the Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and Commonwealth, University of Bristol, 6–9 April.
47.
IngoldT (in press) Dreaming of dragons: On the imagination of real life. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.).
48.
JensenCB (2012) Proposing the motion, GDAT: The task of anthropology is to invent relations. Critique of Anthropology32(1): 47–53.
49.
KoopmanC (2010) Historical critique or transcendental critique in Foucault: Two Kantian lineages. Foucault Studies8: 101–121.
50.
KrugmanDCameronGWhiteC (1995) Visual attention to programming and commercials: The use of in-home observations. Journal of Advertising Research24(1): 1–12.
51.
KuschM (1991) Foucault’s Strata and Fields, New York: Kluwer Academic.
52.
LaidlawJ (2002) For an anthropology of ethics and freedom. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute8: 311–332.
53.
LaidlawJ (2010) Social anthropology. In: SkorupskiJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to Ethics, London: Routledge, pp. 369–383.
54.
La CapraD (1972) Emile Durkheim: Sociologist and Philosopher, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
55.
LaneJ (2000) Pierre Bourdieu: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press.
56.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, trans Porter C, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
58.
LatourB (1996) On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt4(47): 369–381.
59.
LatourB (2003) Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
60.
LatourB (2005a) From realpolitik to dingpolitk or how to make things public. In: LatourBWeibelP (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61.
LatourB (2005b) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62.
LaveJ (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space, trans. Nicholson-Smith D, Oxford: Blackwell.
64.
LewinK (1943) Defining the ‘field at a given time’. Psychological Review50: 292–310.
65.
MahmoodS (2005) Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
66.
MalinowskiB (1978 [1922]) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea, New York: Routledge.
67.
MarcusGECushmanD (1982) Ethnographies as texts. Annual Review of Anthropology25: 25–69.
68.
MartinJ (1993) Force Fields: Between Intellectual History and Cultural Critique, New York: Routledge.
69.
MosseDLewisD (2006) Encountering order and disjuncture: Contemporary anthropological perspectives on the organization of development. Oxford Development Studies34(1): 1–13.
70.
Navaro-YashinY (2009) Affective spaces, melancholic objects: Ruination and the production of anthropological knowledge. Malinowski Memorial Lecture. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute15(1): 1–18.
71.
OrtnerS (2005) Subjectivity and cultural critique. Anthropological Theory5(1): 31–52.
72.
PandianA (2008) Tradition in fragments: Inherited forms and fractures in the ethics of South India. American Ethnologist35(3): 466–480.
73.
PedersenMA (2012) Proposing the motion, GDAT: The task of anthropology is to invent relations. Critique of Anthropology32(1): 59–65.
74.
PfaffenbergerB (1992) Social anthropology of technology. Annual Review of Anthropology21: 491–516.
75.
RabinowPRoseN (2003) The Essential Foucault: Selections from the Essential Works of Foucault, New York: New Press.
76.
RapportN (2002) Part II: The truth of movement, the truth as movement: Post-cultural anthropology and narrational identity. In: AmitVRapportN (eds) The Trouble with Community: Anthropological Reflections on Movement, Identity and Collectivity, London: Pluto Press.
77.
RapportN (2003) I Am Dynamite: An Alternative Anthropology of Power, London: Routledge.
78.
SchützALuckmannT (1973) The Structures of the Lifeworld: Vol. 1, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
79.
Sneath D (n.d.) Cultural installation: Constructing the ethno-national subject in Mongolia. Presented at ‘Freedom, Creativity and Decision: Towards an Anthropology of the Human Subject’, CRASSH, Cambridge, 2–4 April 2012.
80.
StarrettG (1995) The hexis of interpretation: Islam and the body in the Egyptian popular school. American Ethnologist22(4): 953–969.
StrathernM (1996a) Cutting the network. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute2: 517–535.
83.
StrathernM (1996b) The concept of society is theoretically obsolete. In: IngoldT (eds) Key Debates in Anthropology, London: Routledge.
84.
TaussigM (1992) Maleficium: State fetishism. In: TaussigM (eds) The Nervous System, New York: Routledge.
85.
Viveiros de CastroE (1998) Cosmological deixis and Amerindian perspectivism. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute4(3): 469–488.
86.
WeinerJ (2007) History, oral history and memoriation in native title. In: SmithBRMorphyF (eds) The Social Effects of Native Title: Recognition, Translation, Coexistence, Canberra: ANU E Press.
87.
YarrowT (2006) Developing knowledge: Knowledge, relationships and ideology amongst Ghanaian development workers, PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.
