At the turn of the century, Georg Simmel published critical commentaries on what he considered a misguided faith in socialism in the Viennese newspaper Die Zeit. In this article, the implicit presence of Simmel’s own sacrifice model of value in these commentaries is highlighted and its utility for a critical engagement with state efforts to promote a universalist rationality demonstrated. Through measures that promote a universalism, qualitative distinctions between ritual occasions and the everyday are rendered problematic and irrelevant. Resistance to such efforts, it is argued, can be suitably interpreted by way of Simmel’s sacrifice model of value. The discussion is illustrated through case studies of burial practices from late socialist Vietnam where the Party State has long curbed competitive consumption and nowadays promotes cremation as an economical funeral.
Altmann SP ( 1903) Simmel’s philosophy of money. American Journal of Sociology9(1): 46-68.
2.
Appadurai A (ed.) (1986) The Social life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Boudon R. ( 1989) Die Erkenntnistheorie in Simmel’s ‘Philosophie des Geldes’. Zeitschrift für Soziologie18(6): 413-424.
4.
Burke P. ( 2002) Context in context. Common Knowledge8(1): 152-177.
5.
Cantó-Milà N. ( 2005) A Sociological Theory of Value: Georg Simmel’s Sociological Relationism. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
6.
Dilley R (ed.) (1999) The Problem of Context. Oxford: Berghahn.
7.
Ðoàn Loan ( 2010a) Postponement of the closing of Văn Ðiên cemetery [Lùi thòi gian dóng cúa nghĩa trang Văn Ðiên]. VNExpress, 30 June. Available at: http://vnexpress.net/gl/xa-hoi/2010/06/3ba1d854/ ; (accessed 22 June 2011).
8.
Ðoàn Loan ( 2010b) Hanoi assists with money to promote cremation [Hà Nôi hô tro tiênde khuyên khích hóa táng] . VNExpress, 10 July. Available at: http://vnexpress.net/gl/xa-hoi/2010/07/3ba1deaa/; (accessed 22 June 2011).
9.
Ðoàn Loan ( 2010c) Văn Ði n becomes a funeral park [Văn Diên se tró thành công viênnghia]. VNExpress, 16 December. Available at: http://vnexpress.net/gl/xa-hoi/2010/12/3ba244bb/ ; (accessed 22 June 2011).
10.
Dumoutier G. ( 1904) Le Rituel funeraire des Annamites: Etude d’ethnographie religieuse. Hanoi: Impr. F.H. Schneider .
11.
Endres KW ( 2001) Local dynamics of renegotiating ritual space in northern Vietnam: The case of the Dinh. Sojourn16: 70-101.
12.
Endres KW (n.d.) Performing the Divine: Mediums, Markets and Modernity in Urban Vietnam. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
13.
Fabian J. ( 1999 [1995]) Misunderstanding and the perils of context. In: Dilley R (ed.) The Problem of Context. Oxford: Berghahn.
14.
Feher F., Heller A. and Markus G. ( 1984) Dictatorship over Needs: An Analysis of Soviet Societies . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
15.
Giran P. ( 1912) Magie & religion Annamites: Introduction a une philosophie de la civilisation du peuple d’Annam. Paris: A. Challamel.
16.
Graeber D. ( 2001) Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
Hann C (ed.) (2005[1993]) Socialism: Ideals, Ideologies, and Local Practice. London : Routledge.
18.
Hart K. ( 1991) Socialism and Stalinism. Anthropology Today7(6): 19-21.
19.
Huen CW ( 2009) What is context? An ethnophilosophical account. Anthropological Theory9(2): 149-169.
20.
Humphrey C. ( 1998) Marx Went Away, but Karl Stayed Behind. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21.
Kamolnick P. ( 2001) Simmel’s legacy for contemporary value theory: A critical assessment. Sociological Theory19(1): 65-85.
22.
Keane W. ( 1997) Signs of Recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.
23.
Kleinen J. ( 1999) Facing the Future, Reviving the Past: A Study of Social Change in a Northern Vietnamese Village. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
24.
Malarney S. ( 2002) Culture, Ritual and Revolution in Vietnam. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
25.
Merton RK ( 1979 [1942]) The normative structure of science. In: Merton RK (ed.) The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Nguyen Huy Thiep ( 1992) The General Retires and Other Stories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
Pham Quynh Phuong ( 2009) Hero and Deity: Tran Hung Dao and the Resurgence of Popular Religion in Vietnam. Bangkok: Mekong Press.
28.
Porter TM ( 1988) The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820-1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
29.
Rabinow P. ( 1989) French Modern. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Rohls J. ( 1997) Protestantische Theologie der Neuzeit: Das 20. Jahrhundert . Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
31.
Schlecker M. ( 2005) Going back a long way: ‘Home place’, thrift and temporal orientations in northern Vietnam. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute11(3): 509-526.
32.
Scott J. ( 1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
Sewell Jr WH ( 1999) Geertz, cultural systems and history: From synchrony to transformation. In: Ortner SB (ed.) The Fate of Culture: Geertz and Beyond. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
Simmel G. ( 1900a) A chapter in the philosophy of value. American Journal of Sociology5: 577-603.
35.
Simmel G. ( 1900b) Sozialismus und Pessimismus. Die Zeit. Wiener Wochenschrift für Politik, Volkswirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Kunst22(279): 70-71, 3 February.
36.
Simmel G. ( 1900c) Zu einer Theorie des Pessimismus. Die Zeit. Wiener Wochenschrift für Politik, Volkswirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Kunst22 (277): 38-40, 20 January.
37.
Simmel G. ( 1978[1907]) The Philosophy of Money. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
38.
Strathern M. ( 1987) Out of context: The persuasive fictions of anthropology . Current Anthropology28(3): 251-281.
39.
Strathern M. ( 1992) Qualified value: The perspective of gift exchange. In: Humphrey C and Hugh-Jones S (eds) Barter, Exchange and Value: An Anthropological Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Strathern M. ( 1995) The nice thing about culture is that everyone has it. In: Strathern M (ed.) Shifting Contexts: Transformation in Anthropological Knowledge. London: Routledge.
41.
Swart KW ( 1962) ‘Individualism’ in the mid-nineteenth century (1826-1860). The Journal of the History of Ideas23(1): 77-90.
42.
Taylor P. ( 2004) Goddess on the Rise. Honolulu: Hawaii University Press.
43.
Taylor P (ed.) (2007) Modernity and Re-enchantment: Religion in Post-revolutionary Vietnam. SingaporeInstitute of Southeast Asian Studies.
44.
Tru'o'ng Thin ( 2002) The Vietnamese Funeral: Tradition and Heritage [Lê tang Viêt Namtruyên thông và kê thùa] . Hanoi: Hanoi Publishing House .
45.
Turner V. ( 1995[1966]) The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure . New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
46.
Van Gennep A. ( 2001[1909]) The Rites of Passage. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
47.
Verdery K. ( 1996) What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next?Princeton: Princeton University Press.
48.
Zeitlyn D. ( 2009) Understanding anthropological understanding: For a merological anthropology. Anthropological Theory9(2): 209-231.
