Abstract
Is ‘nature’ the only basis we have for explaining universal patterns in culture, such as religious practices? Cognitive and interpretive approaches seem to agree so in surprisingly Cartesian fashion. This paper proposes cosmologies as a second, ‘cultural’ type of universality. For an ethnographer affected by the field, culture is not something out there to either ‘explain’ (Sperber, Lévi-Strauss) or ‘interpret’ (Geertz, Weber). Culture is to be comprehended by ‘getting into’ a variety of shared cosmological states. These cosmological states are (1) reflexive, (2) exhaustive and (3) mutually exclusive categories, which can account for (4) the semantic shifts characterizing practices such as rituals. These four conditions are lacking in the binary mechanisms of cognitive modules of the Standard Model of religion (e.g. Boyer and Liénard’s hazard-precaution) and the epidemiological model (Sperber and Bloch).
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
