The concept of marking was discovered in phonology by Trubetzkoy and generalized to morphology and grammar by Jakobson. In a fundamental application to anthropology, Greenberg integrated a generalized concept of marking into a cognitivelinguistic theory of kinship universals. Greenberg's theory is important for three reasons: (1) it leads to the discovery and explanation of cross-cultural universals in kinship classification; (2) it predicts the order in which kin terms evolve and establishes, thereby, criteria for evaluating alternative, competing reconstructions of kinship systems; (3) it provides a means for inferring features of prehistoric social organization. This paper illustrates these applications and points out the typological and cognitive implications of marking effects in kinship systems. The analysis demonstrates that a formal deductive approach to kinship can yield results not obtainable by more usual informal and inductive methods.
Aberle, D.F. (1967) ‘ A Scale of Alternate Generation Terminology ’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology23: 261–276.
2.
Allen, N.J. (1986) ‘ Tetradic Theory: An Approach to Kinship ’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford17: 87–109.
3.
Basso, E.B. (1970) ‘ Xingu Carib Kinship Terminology and Marriage: Another View ’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology26: 402–416.
4.
Bruner, J.S. , J.J. Goodnow and G.A. Austin (1956) A Study of Thinking. New York: Wiley.
5.
D'Andrade, R.G. (1971) ‘Procedures for Predicting Kinship Terminologies from Features of Social Organization’, in P. Kay (ed.) Explorations in Mathematical Anthropology, pp. 60–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
Dole, G.E. (1969) ‘ Generation Kinship Nomenclature as an Adaptation to Exogamy ’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology25: 105–121.
7.
Dyen, I. and D.F. Aberle (1974) Lexical Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Elmendorf, W.W. (1961) ‘ System Change in Salish Kinship Terminologies ’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology17: 365–382.
9.
Epling, P.J. , J. Kirk and J.P. Boyd (1973) ‘ Genetic Relations of Polynesian Sibling Terminologies ’, American Anthropologist75: 1596–1625.
10.
Firth, R. (1936) We the Tikopia. London: Allen and Unwin.
11.
Force, R.W. and M. Force (1972) Just One House: A Description and Analysis of Kinship in the Palau Islands. Honolulu: B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 235.
12.
Gifford, E.W. (1922) ‘ Californian Kinship Terminologies ’, University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology18: 1–285.
13.
Goodenough, W.H. (1968[1956]) ‘ Componential Analysis and the Study of Meaning ’, Language32: 195–216. Reprinted in P. Bohannon and J. Middleton (eds) Kinship and Social Organization, pp. 93–124. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
14.
Goodenough, W.H. (1980[1969]) Description and Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Greenberg, J. (1966) ‘Language Universals’, in T.A. Sebeok (ed.) Current Trends in Linguistics, pp. 61–112. The Hague: Mouton.
16.
Greenberg, J.H. (1978) ‘Typology and Cross-Linguistic Generalization’, in J.H. Greenberg (ed.) Universals of Human Language, pp. 33–59. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
Greenberg, J.H. (1987) ‘ The Present Status of Markedness Theory: A Reply to Scheffler ’, Journal of Anthropological Research43: 367–374.
18.
Greenberg, J.H. (1990[1980]) ‘Universals of Kinship Terminology’, in K. Denning and S. Kemmer (eds) On Language: Selected Writings of Joseph H. Greenberg, pp. 310–327. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
Hage, P. (1997) ‘ Unthinkable Categories and the Fundamental Laws of Kinship ’, American Ethnologist24: 652–667.
20.
Hage, P. (1998) ‘ Proto-Polynesian Kin Terms and Descent Groups ’, Oceanic Linguistics37: 189–192.
21.
Hage, P. (1999a) ‘ Linguistic Evidence for Primogeniture and Rank in Proto-Oceanic Society ’, Oceanic Linguistics38: 366–375.
22.
Hage, P. (1999b) ‘ Alternate Generation Terminology: A Theory for a Finding ’, Journal of Anthropological Research55: 521–539.
23.
Hage, P. (1999c) ‘ Universals in the Structure and Evolution of Kinship Terminologies: Evidence from Salish ’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute5: 423–441.
24.
Hage, P. and F. Harary (1996) Island Networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hage, P. and J. Marck (2001) ‘The Marking of Sex Distinctions in Polynesian Kinship Terminologies’, Oceanic Linguistics.
26.
Hoijer, H. (1956) ‘ Athapaskan Kinship Systems ’, American Anthropologist58: 309–333.
27.
Hymes, D.H. and H.E. Driver (1958) ‘ Concerning the Proto-Athapaskan Kinship System ’, American Anthropologist60: 152–155.
28.
Jakobson, R. (1932) ‘Zur Struktur des Russischen Verbums’, in R. Jakobson , Selected Writings, pp. 3–15. The Hague: Mouton.
29.
Jakobson, R. (1939) ‘Signe Zero’, in R. Jakobson , Selected Writings, pp. 211–219. The Hague: Mouton.
30.
Jakobson, R. (1971[1957]) ‘Shifters, Verbal Categories and the Russian Verb 5’, in R. Jakobson , Seleced WritingsII, pp. 130–147. The Hague: Mouton.
31.
Jakobson, R. and K. Pomorska (1983) Dialogues. Cambridge, MA: MIT and Cambridge University Press.
32.
Kay, P. (1971) ‘Introduction to D'Andrade’, in P. Kay (ed.) Explorations in Mathematical Anthropology, p. 60-60. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
Kirch, P.V. (1997) The Lapita Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
34.
Kirchhoff, P. (1932) ‘ Verwandtschaftsbezeichnungen und Verwandtenheirat ’, Zeitschrift für Ethnologie64: 41–72.
35.
Kroeber, A.L. (1968[1909]) ‘Classificatory Systems of Relationship’ , Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute39: 77–84. In P. Bohannon and J. Middleton (eds) Kinship and Social Organization, pp. 19–27. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.
36.
Kronenfeld, D. (1974) ‘ Sibling Typology: Beyond Nerlove and Romney ’, American Ethnologist1: 489–506.
37.
Kronenfeld, D. (1996) Plastic Glasses and Church Fathers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
Lounsbury, F.G. (1964) ‘Formal Analysis of Crow- and Omaha-type Kinship Terminologies’, in W.H. Goodenough (ed.) Explorations in Cultural Anthropology, pp. 351–393. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Lounsbury, Floyd G. (1969) ‘Language and Culture’, in Sidney Hook (ed.) Language and Philosophy, pp. 3–29. New York: New York University Press.
40.
Lowie, R.H. (1928) ‘ A Note on Relationship Terminologies ’, American Anthropologist30: 263–267.
41.
Milke, W. (1938) ‘ Die Benennungen der Geschwister in den Austronesischen Sprachen Ozeaniens’ , Zeitschrift für Ethnologie70: 51–66.
42.
Moravscsik, E.A. and J.R. Wirth (1986) ‘Markedness – An Overview’, in F.R. Eckman , E.A. Moravscsik and J.R. Wirth (eds) Markedness, pp. 1–11. New York: Plenum.
43.
Morgan, L.H. (1870) Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge no. 218. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
44.
Murdock, G.P. (1949) Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
45.
Murdock, G.P. (1970) ‘ Kin Term Patterns and their Distribution ’, Ethnology7: 1–24.
46.
Needham, R. (1974) ‘ The Evolution of Social Classification: A Commentary on the Warao Case ’, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde130: 16–43.
47.
Nerlove, S.B. and A.K. Romney (1967) ‘ Sibling Terminology and Cross-Sex Behavior ’, American Anthropologist69: 179–187.
48.
Pawley, A. (1981) ‘Melanesian Diversity and Polynesian Homogeneity’, in K.J. Hollyman and A. Pawley (eds) Studies in Pacific Languages and Cultures in Honour of Bruce Biggs, pp. 269–309. Auckland: Linguistic Society of New Zealand.
49.
Rivers, W.H.R. (1914) Kinship and Social Organization. London: Constable.
50.
Scheffler, H.W. (1987) ‘ Markedness in Systems of Kin Classification ’, Journal of Anthropological Research43: 203–221.
51.
Thompson, L. (1940) Southern Lau, Fiji: An Ethnography. Honolulu: B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 162.
52.
Trautmann, T.R. (1981) Dravidian Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Trubetzkoy, N.S. (1929) ‘ Zur Allgemeinen Theorie der Phonologischen Vokalsystemen ’, Travaux du Cercle Linguistic de Prague1: 39–67.
54.
Wallace, A.F.C. and J.R. Atkins (1960) ‘ The Meaning of Kinship Terms ’, American Anthropologist62: 57–80.
55.
White, C.B. (1957) ‘ A Comparison of Theories on Southern Athapaskan Kinship Systems ’, American Anthropologist59: 434–448.
56.
White, C.B. (1958) ‘ Rejoinder (to Hymes and Driver 1958) ’, American Anthropologist41: 566–573.
