The article questions the current consensus that kinship terminologies evolve from something like the Dravidian to something like the English terminology, examining it over three time periods. Before Morgan the study of kinship terminology was embedded within a comparative study of core vocabularies to determine historic relations among nations (e.g. Leibniz). Morgan's breakthrough was to disembed the terms of kinship from the vocabulary list and conceptualize them as a set. His vision of their evolution had two phases. Before the revolutionary expansion of ethnological time in the mid-19th century, he developed an evolutionary view of the Indo-European kinship terminology that was very acute but tied to a short chronology for world history that the time revolution shortly exploded; after the time revolution he conceived the Iroquois and the English (as types of the Classificatory and the Descriptive) terminologies as an evolutionary series caused by successive reformations of the marriage rule. After Morgan, Dravidian and its structural neighbors have come to play the role of evolutionary starting-point. The article concludes with reasons to be skeptical of the current consensus and ways to move forward.
Allen, N.J. (1986) ‘Tetradic Theory: An Approach to Kinship’, Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford17: 87–109.
2.
Allen, N.J. (1989) ‘The Evolution of Kinship Terminologies’, Lingua77: 173–185.
3.
Allen, N.J. (1998) ‘The Prehistory of Dravidian-type Terminologies’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 314–331. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
4.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Coke, Edward (1817) The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. Or, A Commentary upon Littleton, 17th edn, 2 vols. London: W. Clarke and Sons.
6.
Du Ponceau, P.S. (1838) MÈmoire Sur le SystÈme Grammatical des Langues de Quelques Nations Indiennes de l'AmÈrique du Nord. Paris.
7.
Fabian, Johannes (1983) Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian (1999) ‘“Communities of Blood”: The Natural History of Kinship in Nineteenth-Century America’, Comparative Studies in Society and History41: 215–262.
9.
Godelier, Maurice (1995) ‘Is Social Anthropology Indissolubly Linked to the West, its Birthplace?’, International Social Science Journal47: 141–158.
10.
Godelier, Maurice , Thomas R. Trautmann and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat, eds (1998) Transformations of Kinship. (Papers of the Round Table on Dravidian Kinship, Maison Suger, Paris, 3–5 June 1993.) Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
11.
Gough, Kathleen (1961) ‘Mappilla: North Kerala’, in David M. Schneider and Kathleen Gough (eds) Matrilineal Kinship, pp. 415–442. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
12.
Gruber, Jacob W. (1965) ‘Brixham Cave and the Antiquity of Man’, in Melford E. Spiro (ed.) Context and Meaning in Cultural Anthropology, pp. 373–402. New York: The Free Press; London: Collier-Macmillan.
13.
Hodgen, Margaret (1936) The Doctrine of Survivals: A Chapter in the History of Scientific Method in the Study of Man. London: Allenson & Co. Ltd.
14.
Hornborg, Alf (1998) ‘Serial Redundancy in Amazonian Social Structure: Is There a Method for Poststructuralist Comparison?’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 8–186. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
15.
Ives, John W. (1998) ‘Developmental Processes in the Pre-Contact History of Athapaskan, Algonquian, and Numic Kin Systems’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann, and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 94–139. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
16.
Jefferson, Thomas (c. 1782) Notes on the State of Virginia. N.p., n. pub. (First Edition of the Notes on Virginia, found in the Bodleian Library, Oxford University).
17.
Jones, Sir William (1788) ‘The Third Anniversary Discourse: On the Hindus’, Asiatic Researches1: 415–431.
18.
Kryukov, M.V. (1998) ‘The Synchro-Diachronic Method and the Multidirectionality of Kinship Transformations’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 294–313. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
19.
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm von (1718) Desiderata Circa Linguas Populorum, ad Dn. Podesta, Interpretem Caesareum Transmissa. Otium Hanoveranum, ed. Joachimis Fridericus Fellerus. Leipsig: J.C. Marini. (Reprinted in G.W. Leibnitii opera omnia ed. L. Dutens, Geneva, vol. 6, part 2 (Collectanea etymologica), pp. 228–231.)
20.
LÈvi-Strauss, Claude (1949) Les Structures …lÈmetaires de la ParentÈ. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
21.
LÈvi-Strauss, Claude (1969) The Elementary Structures of Kinship (Les Structures …lÈmetaires de la ParentÈ). Rev. ed. James Harle Bell and John Richard von Sturmer (tr.) and Rodney Needham (ed.). London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.
22.
Lounsbury, Floyd G. (1964a) ‘The Structural Analysis of Kinship Semantics’, in Horace G. Lunt (ed.) Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguists, pp. 1073–1093. The Hague: Mouton.
23.
Lounsbury, Floyd G. (1964b) ‘A Formal Account of the Crow and Omaha-type Kinship Terminologies’, in W.H. Goodenough (ed.) Explorations in Cultural Anthropology, pp. 351–393. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Morgan, Lewis Henry (1851) League of the Ho-d-no-sau-nee, or Iroquois. Rochester, NY: Sage and Brother.
25.
Morgan, Lewis Henry (c. 1865) Nomenclatures of Relationship. Morgan Papers, Rush Rees Library, University of Rochester (manuscript).
26.
Morgan, Lewis Henry (1870) Systems of Consanguinity and Affinity of the Human Family. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge, vol. 17. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
27.
Morgan, Lewis Henry (1877) Ancient Society, or Researches in the Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization. Reprint with a foreword by Elisabeth Tooker 1985. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
28.
Murdock, George Peter (1949) Social Structure. New York: The Free Press; London: Collier-Macmillan.
29.
Needham, Rodney (1971) ‘Remarks on the Analysis of Kinship and Marriage’, in R. Needham (ed.) Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. (ASA Monographs, 11), pp. xiii–cxvii. London: Tavistock.
30.
Pallas, P.S. (1786–89) Linguarum Totius Orbis Vocabularia Comparativa, 2 vols. St. Petersburg: Carl Schnoor.
31.
Parkin, Robert (1998) ‘Dravidian and Iroquois in South Asia’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 252–270. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
32.
Rivers, W.H.R. (1914) Kinship and Social Organisation. London: Constable & Co.
33.
Sapir, Edward (1921) Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
34.
Schneider, David M. (1972) ‘What is Kinship all About?’, in Priscilla Reining (ed.) Kinship Studies in the Morgan Centennial Year, pp. 32–63. Washington, DC: The Anthropological Society of Washington.
35.
Schneider, David M. (1984) A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Tjon Sie Fat, Franklin E. (1998) ‘On the Formal Analysis of “Dravidian,”“Iroquois,” and “Generational” Varieties as Nearly Associative Combinations’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 59–93. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
37.
Trautmann, Thomas R. (1981) Dravidian Kinship. (Cambridge Studies in Social Anthropology, vol. 36.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Trautmann, Thomas R. (1987) Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
39.
Trautmann, Thomas R. (1992) ‘The Revolution in Ethnological Time’ (the Marett Memorial Lecture 1991), Man n.s.27: 379–397.
40.
Trautmann, Thomas R. (1998) Aryans and British India. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
41.
Trautmann, Thomas R. and R.H. Barnes (1998) ‘“Dravidian’”, “Iroquois,” and “Crow-Omaha” in North American Perspective’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann, and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 27–58. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
42.
Tylor, E.B. (1889) ‘On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent’, Journal of the Anthropological Institute18: 245–272.
43.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo (1998) ‘Dravidian and Related Kinship Systems’, in Maurice Godelier, Thomas R. Trautmann and Franklin Tjon Sie Fat (eds) Transformations of Kinship, pp. 332–385. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
44.
Yalman, Nur (1962) ‘The Structure of the Sinhalese Kindred: A Re-examination of the Dravidian Terminology’, American Anthropologist64: 548–575.
45.
Yalman, Nur (1967) Under the Bo Tree. Studies in Caste, Kinship and Marriage in the Interior of Ceylon. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
