This article examines the execution of forced removals in Italy. Drawing on the analysis of original sources, it explores which factors affect the use of force during return operations and how that use is rationalized. Offering a unique empirical perspective, the article documents the operational strategies in an area of administrative action where use of force is notably intense. After a brief methodological introduction, the analysis focuses on the logistics of forced returns, exploring the intricate relationship between the spatial and temporal dimensions that shape this distinct exercise of state coercive power. Our research indicates that the use of force is a constant element in forced returns. However, we contend that the high level of coercion involved should not be attributed solely to individual misconduct. Instead, it reflects a form of systemic violence that normalizes and institutionalizes subjective violence, embedding it within the very structure of the return process.
AlpertGPDunhamRG (2004) Understanding Police Use of Force: Officers, Suspects, and Reciprocity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AlpertGPMacDonaldJ (2001) Police use of force: An analysis of organizational characteristics. Justice Quarterly18(2): 393–409.
3.
AndersonBGibneyMJPaolettiE (2011) Boundaries of belonging: Deportation and the constitution and contestation of citizenship. Citizenship Studies15(5): 543–545.
4.
ArmacostBE (2004) Organizational culture and police misconduct. The George Washington Law Review72(3): 453–546.
5.
BackmanA (2023) The labor of chartering a deportation journey. Nordic Journal of Migration Research13(4): 417–424.
6.
BorrelliLM (2021) They know the procedure; they just don’t know when we will come: Uncovering the practice of unannounced deportations. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies47(15): 3473–3491.
7.
BorrelliLMWaltersW (2024) Blood, sweat and tears: On the corporeality of deportation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space42(8): 1387–1404.
8.
BosworthM (2025) Supply Chain Justice: The Logistics of British Border Control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
9.
CampesiG (2013) La detenzione amministrativa degli stranieri: storia, diritto, politica. Roma: Carocci.
10.
CampesiG (2015) Hindering the deportation machine: An ethnography of power and resistance in immigration detention. Punishment & Society17(4): 427–453.
11.
CampesiG (2024) Regulating mobility through detention: Understanding the new geography of control and containment at the Southern European border. Theoretical Criminology28(4): 554–576.
12.
CampesiGCoresiF (2024) Trattenuti. Una radiografia del sistema detentivo per stranieri. Bari: Università di Bari.
13.
Casey-MaslenSConnollyS (2017) Police Use of Force Under International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14.
ChehMM (1995) Are lawsuits an answer to police brutality?. In: GellerWATochA (eds) And Justice for All: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, 233–259.
15.
Council of Europe (2005) Twenty guidelines on forced return. Committee of Ministers. 4 May 2005.
16.
CoutinSB (2014) Deportation studies: origins, themes and directions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(4): 671–681.
17.
De GenovaNP (2002) Migrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology31(1): 419–447.
18.
DrotbohmHHasselbergI. (2015) Editorial introduction: Deportation, anxiety, justice: new ethnographic perspectives. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(4): 551–562.
19.
EllermannA (2008) The limits of unilateral migration control: Deportation and inter-state cooperation. Government and Opposition43(2): 168–189.
20.
EllermannA (2009) States Against Migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
EspositoFOrnelasJBriozzoE, et al. (2019) Ecology of sites of confinement: Everyday life in a detention center for illegalized non-citizens. American Journal of Community Psychology63(1–2): 190–207.
22.
FeketeL (2005) The deportation machine: Europe, asylum and human rights. Race & Class47(1): 64–78.
23.
FeketeL (2011) Accelerated removals: The human cost of EU deportation policies. Race & Class52(4): 89–97.
24.
FoucaultM (1978) The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.
25.
Garante nazionale (2017) Relazione al Parlamento. Roma.
26.
Garante nazionale (2018a) Rapporto tematico sull’attività di monitoraggio delle operazioni di rimpatrio forzato di cittadini stranieri (dicembre 2017 - giugno 2018). Roma.
27.
Garante nazionale (2018b) Relazione al Parlamento. Roma.
28.
Garante nazionale (2019) Relazione al Parlamento. Roma.
29.
Garante nazionale (2021) Rapporto tematico sull’attività di monitoraggio delle operazioni di rimpatrio forzato di cittadini stranieri (gennaio 2019 - giugno 2021). Roma.
30.
Garante nazionale (2022) Rapporto tematico sull’attività di monitoraggio delle operazioni di rimpatrio forzato di cittadini stranieri (luglio 2021 - settembre 2022). Roma.
31.
GibneyMJ (2008) Asylum and the expansion of deportation in the United Kingdom. Government and Opposition43(2): 146–167.
32.
GillNConlonDBurridgeA (2016) Carceral circuitry: New directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 183–204.
33.
Golash-BozaT (2019) Punishment beyond the deportee: The collateral consequences of deportation. American Behavioral Scientist63(9): 1331–1349.
34.
HasselbergI (2016) Enduring Uncertainty: Deportation, Punishment and Everyday Life. New York: Berghahn Books.
35.
HollifieldJFMartinPOrrenius PiaM (2014) The dilemmas of immigration control. In: HollifieldJFMartinPOrreniusPM (eds) Controlling Immigration: A global perspective, 3rd ed. Redwood City: Stanford University Press, 3–33.
36.
KanstroomD (2000) Deportation, social control, and punishment: Some thoughts about why hard laws make bad cases. Harvard Law Review113(8): 1890–1935.
37.
KhosraviS (2009) Sweden: Detention and deportation of asylum seekers. Race & Class50(4): 38–56.
38.
KlingerDA (1994) Demeanor or crime? Why ‘hostile’ citizens are more likely to be arrested. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal32(3): 475–493.
39.
KlockarsCB (1995) A theory of excessive force and control. In: WilliamAGellerWATochH (eds) And Justice for All: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force. Washington, D.C.: Police Executive Research Forum, 11–29.
40.
LegomskiSH (2014) The removal of irregular migrants in Europe and America. In: ChetailV (eds) Research Handbook on Migration and International Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 148–170.
41.
LindbergABorrelliLM (2019) Let the right one in? On European migration authorities’ resistance to research. Social Anthropology27(1): 17–32.
42.
LutzFMaananashviliS (2016) Return directive. In: ThymDHailbronnerK (eds) EU Immigration and Asylum Law. München: Beck/Hart/Nomos, 692–804.
43.
MajcherI (2020) The European Union Returns Directive and Its Compatibility with International Human Rights Law. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill|Nijhoff.
MartielloG (2019) I limiti penali dell’uso della forza pubblica: una indagine di parte generale. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
46.
Ministero dell’interno (2015), Linee guida per i servizi di scorta e persone da rimpatriare. Roma.
47.
Ministero dell’interno (2021) Riscontro a Garante nazionale dei diritti delle persone private della libertà personale. N.555/1-DOC/Area I/C/STRAN/SORD/4462-21. Roma.
48.
Ministero dell’interno (2023) Riscontro a Garante nazionale dei diritti delle persone private della libertà personale. N.400/B/2023/2^Div/9. Roma.
49.
PeutzN (2006) Embarking on an anthropology of removal. Current Anthropology47(2): 217–241.
50.
SchusterLMajidiN (2019) Deportation and forced return. In: BlochADonaG (eds) Forced migration: current issues and debates. London: Routledge, 88–107.
51.
TerrillWMastrofskiSD (2002) Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly19(2): 215–248.
52.
UNODC (2011) Handbook on Police Accountability, Oversight and Integrity. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
53.
UNODC, and OHCHR (2017) Resource Book on the use of Force and Firearms in Law enforcement. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
54.
ValverdeM (2015) Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance. London: Routledge.
55.
Van der LindenH (2012) On the violence of systemic violence. Radical Philosophy Review15(1): 33–51.
56.
Van HoutumHVan NaerssenT (2002) Bordering, ordering and othering. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en sociale Geografie93(2): 125–136.
57.
WaltersW (2002) Deportation, expulsion, and the international police of Aliens. Citizenship Studies6(3): 265–292.
58.
WaltersW (2016) The flight of the deported: Aircraft, deportation, and politics. Geopolitics21(2): 435–458.
59.
WaltersW (2017) The microphysics of power redux. In: BondittiPBigoDGrosF (eds) Foucault and the Modern International. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 57–76.
60.
WaltersW (2018) The microphysics of deportation: A critical Reading of return flight monitoring reports. In: 2018 ZiF Workshop Studying Migration Policies at the Interface Between Empirical Research and Normative Analysis, pp. 161–185.
61.
WaltersW (2024) The deportation plane: Charter flights and carceral mobilities. Mobilities19(4): 646–662.
62.
WeberL (2015) Deciphering deportation practices across the Global North. In: Pickering S.SHamJ (eds) The Routledge Handbook on Crime and International Migration. London: Routledge, 155–178.
63.
WeberLMohnSBVecchioF, et al. (2020) Beyond deportation: Researching the control of outward mobility using a space of flows logic. Global Networks20(1): 65–84.
64.
WeissmanDMGodoyAClarkHM (2021) The final act: Deportation by ICE air. Hofstra Law Review49: 437–498.
65.
WordenRE (1995) The ‘causes’ of police brutality: theory and evidence on police use of force. In: GellerWATochH (eds) And Justice for All: Understanding and Controlling Police Abuse of Force. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum, 30–60.
66.
ŽižekS (2008) Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Picador.
