For Americans convicted of crimes, collateral consequences impose barriers extending long past the completion of official sentences. The present study develops a novel distinction between congruent and incongruent collateral consequences. Congruent consequence laws impose barriers that are closely linked to their triggering offenses, while incongruent measures impose barriers that are only loosely connected to triggering offenses—or are disconnected entirely. Focusing specifically on the impactful consequence of restricting legal driving privileges, this article examines how the determinants of these policies vary according to the degree of congruity between triggering offense and collateral consequence. Using novel data on driver's license restriction laws, we find that the Black composition of state felony record populations is positively associated with the extensiveness of license restrictions for nondriving safety offenses. Conversely, we do not find a statistically significant relationship between states’ felony record racial composition and their volume of license restrictions for driving safety offenses. These findings reveal a major divergence in pathways leading to congruent and incongruent collateral consequence statutes at the state level. The results are further notable given driving's central role in the US socioeconomic system.
AdairC (2019) Licensing citizenship: Anti-blackness, identification documents, and transgender studies. American Quarterly71(2): 569–594.
2.
AlschulerA (2003) The changing purposes of criminal punishment: A retrospective of the past century and some thoughts about the next. University of Chicago Law Review70(1): 1–22.
3.
BarberAB (1931) Why drivers’ license laws with examination are needed. Georgia Lawyer2(1): 14–19.
4.
BeckerHS (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
5.
BehrensAUggenCManzaJ (2003) Ballot manipulation and the ‘menace of Negro domination’: Racial threat and felon disenfranchisement in the United States, 1850 2002. American Journal of Sociology109(3): 559–605.
6.
BergerML (1986) Women drivers! The emergence of folklore and stereotypic opinions concerning feminine automotive behavior. Women's Studies International Forum9(3): 257–263.
7.
BontragerSBalesWChiricosT (2005) Race, ethnicity, threat and the labeling of convicted felons. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal43(3): 589–622.
8.
CarnegieJA (2007) Driver's License Suspensions, Impacts and Fairness Study. New Brunswick, NJ: Alan M. Voorhees Transportation Center, Rutgers University.
9.
ChinG (2012) The new civil death: Rethinking punishment in the era of mass incarceration. University of Pennsylvania Law Review160(6): 1789–1833.
10.
CohenS (1985) Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
11.
CottonM (2000) Back with a vengeance: The resilience of retribution as an articulated purpose of criminal punishment. American Criminal Law Review37(4): 1313–1362.
12.
CrozierWEGarrettBL (2020) Driven to failure: An empirical analysis of driver's license suspension in North Carolina. Duke Law Journal69(7): 1585–1642.
13.
DemleitnerNV (1999) Preventing internal Exile: The need for restrictions on collateral sentencing consequences. Stanford Law and Policy Review153: 153–171.
14.
EppCRMaynard-MoodySHaider-MarkelD (2014) Pulled Over: How Police Stops Define Race and Citizenship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
EwaldA (2011) Collateral consequences and the perils of categorical ambiguity. In: SaratADouglasLUmphreyM (eds) Law as Punishment/Law as Regulation. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 77–124.
16.
EwaldA (2012) Collateral consequences in the American states. Social Science Quarterly93(1): 211–247.
GoffmanE (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Simon & Schuster.
19.
HeadworthS (2023) Rules of the Road: The Automobile and the Transformation of American Criminal Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
20.
HensonA (2022) Desistance, persistence, resilience, and resistance: A qualitative exploration of how Black fathers with criminal records navigate employer discrimination. Punishment & Society24(2): 262–283.
21.
HoskinsZ (2019) Beyond Punishment? A Normative Account of the Collateral Legal Consequences of Conviction. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
HurwitzJPeffleyM (1997) Public perceptions of race and crime: The role of racial stereotypes. American Journal of Political Science41(2): 375–401.
23.
JoanisseMGagnonSVoloacaM (2012) Overly cautious and dangerous: An empirical evidence of the older driver stereotypes. Accident Analysis & Prevention45: 802–810.
24.
JoyceNRPfeifferMRZulloAR, et al. (2020) Individual and geographic variation in driver's license suspensions: Evidence of disparities by race. Ethnicity and Income. Journal of Transport & Health19: e100933.
25.
KaiserJ (2016) Revealing the hidden sentence: How to add transparency, legitimacy, and purpose to “collateral” punishment policy. Harvard Law & Policy Review10: 123–184.
ManzaJUggenC (2008) Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
MarcusA (2003) Are the roads a safer place because drug offenders aren't on them? An analysis of punishing drug offenders with license suspensions. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy13(4): 557–584.
31.
MarshA (2017) Rethinking driver's license suspensions for nonpayment of fines and fees. In: SmithDWCampbellCFKavanaghBP (eds) Trends in State Courts 2017. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts, 20–26.
32.
MartinKDSykesBLShannonS, et al. (2018) Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in US systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology1: 471–495.
33.
McElhattanD (2018) “$40 to make sure”: Background checks and the endogenous construction of criminal risk. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society77: 99–121.
34.
McElhattanD (2022a) The proliferation of criminal background check laws in the United States. American Journal of Sociology127(4): 1037–1093.
35.
McElhattanD (2022b) Punitive ambiguity: State-level criminal record data quality in the era of widespread background screening. Punishment & Society24(3): 367–386.
36.
McKenzieB (2015) Who Drives to Work? Commuting by Automobile in the United States: 2013. American Community Survey Reports. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
National Conference of State Legislatures (2020) License Restrictions for Failure to Pay Child Support. Available at: https://www.ncsl.org/research/humanservices/license restrictions-forfailure-to-pay-child-support.aspx (accessed 25 November 2022).
39.
National Reentry Resource Center (2021) National Inventory of the Collateral Consequences of Conviction. Available at: https://niccc.nationalreentryresourcecenter.org/ (accessed 11 January 2022).
40.
OwensMSmithA (2012) “Deviants” and democracy: Punitive policy designs and the social rights of felons as citizens. American Politics Research40(3): 531–567.
41.
PagerD (2007) Marked: Race, Crime and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
42.
QuillianLPagerD (2010) Estimating risk: Stereotype amplification and the perceived risk of criminal victimization. Social Psychological Quarterly73(1): 79–104.
43.
SampsonRJLaubJH (1990) Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review55(5): 609–627.
44.
SchneiderAIngramH (1993) Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. The American Political Science Review87(2): 334–347.
ShannonSKUggenCSchnittkerJ, et al. (2017) The growth, scope, and spatial distribution of people with felony records in the United States, 1948–2010. Demography54(5): 1795–1818.
47.
SiyJOCheryanS (2016) Prejudice masquerading as praise: The negative echo of positive stereotypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin42(7): 941–954.
48.
SkoganWG (1995) Crime and the racial fears of white Americans. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science539: 59–71.
49.
SossJFordingRCSchramSF (2011) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
50.
SugieNNewarkC (2023) Welfare drug bans and criminal legal cycling. American Journal of Sociology129(1): 41–75.
51.
TravisJ (2002) Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In: MauerMChesney-LindM (eds) Invisible Punishment: The Collateral Consequences of Mass Imprisonment. New York: New Press, 15–36.
52.
TripkovicM (2019) Punishment and Citizenship: A Theory of Criminal Disenfranchisement. New York: Oxford University Press.
