Although the study of penal changes throughout history is central to punishment studies, the field has taken little from historical institutionalists’ theories of institutional change. One of the most relevant such theories is path dependence. This article outlines path dependence frameworks’ most fruitful elements for studying penal change. Drawing on foundational political science and historical sociology texts, as well as several punishment scholars’ works, this article highlights the advantages of thinking through stasis and change, mechanisms of inertia such as feedback effects, and exogenous shocks. While path dependence offers a powerful framework, it can also be an unsatisfying explanation at times, particularly when path dependence is itself a seemingly uphill battle, when apparent stasis hides ongoing change, or when institutions survive hypothesized mechanisms of change. This paper closes by discussing some ways in which punishment scholars can strengthen the path dependence framework by blending it with recent theoretical developments in the punishment studies field.
ArthurWB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal99(394): 116–131.
2.
AviramH (2015) Cheap on Crime: Recession-Era Politics and the Transformation of American Punishment. Oakland, California: UC Press.
3.
BannerS (2002) The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
BarkerV (2006) The politics of punishing: Building a state governance theory of american imprisonment variation. Punishment & Society8(1): 5–32.
5.
BeckettK (1997) Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BeyerJ (2010) The same or not the same: On the variety of mechanisms of path dependence. International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences3(3): 186–196.
7.
BrownM (2002) The politics of penal excess and the echo of colonial penality. Punishment & Society4(4): 403–423.
8.
CampbellJL (2021 [2004]) Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton: University Press.
9.
CampbellMCSchoenfeldH (2013) The transformation of America’s penal order: A historicized political sociology of punishment. American Journal of Sociology118(5): 1375–1423.
10.
CapocciaG (2015). Critical junctures and institutional change. In: MahoneyJThelenK (eds) Advances in Comparative-Historical Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 147–179
11.
ChurchillD (2019) History, periodization and the character of contemporary crime control. Criminology & Criminal Justice19(4): 475–492.
12.
DaganDTelesS (2014) Locked in? Conservative reform and the future of mass incarceration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science651(1): 266–276.
13.
DavidPA (1985) Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review75(2): 332–337.
14.
DurkheimÉ (1984[1893]) The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press.
15.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
16.
GarlandD (1985) Punishment and Welfare. Brookfield, VT: Gower.
17.
GarlandD (1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. University of Chicago Press.
18.
GarlandD (2018) Theoretical advances and problems in the sociology of punishment. Punishment & Society20(1): 8–33.
19.
GoodmanPPageJPhelpsM (2017) Breaking the Pendulum: The Long Struggle Over Criminal Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
GottschalkM (2006) The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
GrattetRJennessVCurryTR (1998) The homogenization and differentiation of hate crime law in the united states, 1978 to 1995: Innovation and diffusion in the criminalization of bigotry. American Sociological Review63(2): 286–307.
22.
HallsworthS (2002) The case for a postmodern penality. Theoretical Criminology6(2): 145–163.
23.
HirschAJ (1992) The Rise of the Penitentiary: Prisons and Punishment in Early America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
24.
HutchinsonS (2006) Countering catastrophic criminology: Reform, punishment and the modern liberal compromise. Punishment & Society8(4): 443–467.
25.
IrwinJ (2005) The Warehouse Prison: Disposal of the New Dangerous Class. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
26.
KluttzDN (2019) The path of the law review: How interfield ties contribute to institutional emergence and buffer against change. Law & Society Review53(1): 239–274.
27.
KrasnerSD (1988) Sovereignty: An institutional perspective. Comparative Political Studies21(1): 66–94.
28.
LaceyN (2013) The rule of law and the political economy of criminalisation: An agenda for research. Punishment & Society15(4): 349–366.
29.
LewisWD (1965) From Newgate to Dannemora: The Rise of the Penitentiary in New York, 1796–1848. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
30.
LipsetSMRokkanS (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems and voter alignments: An introduction. In: LipsetSM, et al. (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press, 1–64
31.
LynchM (2010) Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32.
MahoneyJ (2000) Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society29(4): 507–548.
33.
MahoneyJSchensulD (2006). Historical context and path dependence. In: Robert E. Goodin and Charles Tilly (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 454–471.
34.
MahoneyJThelenK (2009). A theory of gradual institutional change. In: MahoneyJ, et al. (eds) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1–37.
35.
MasurLP (1989) Rites of Execution: Capital Punishment and the Transformation of American Culture, 1776–1865. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
MatthewsR (2005) The myth of punitiveness. Theoretical Criminology9(2): 175–201.
37.
MauruttoPHannah-MoffatK (2006) Assembling risk and the restructuring of penal control. British Journal of Criminology46(3): 438–454.
38.
Maxwell-StewartH (2010) Convict transportation from britain and Ireland 1615–1870. History Compass8(11): 1221–42.
39.
McLennanRM (2008) The Crisis of Imprisonment: Protest, Politics, and the Making of the American Penal State, 1776–1941. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
MeranzeM (1996) Laboratories of Virtue: Punishment, Revolution, and Authority in Philadelphia, 1760–1835. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
41.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83(2): 340–363.
42.
MurakawaN (2014) The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
NorthDC (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
O’MalleyP (1999) Volatile and contradictory punishment. Theoretical Criminology3(2): 175–196.
45.
OrloffAS (1993) The Politics of Pensions: A Comparative Analysis of Britain, Canada, and the United States, 1880–1940. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
46.
OshinskyD (1997) Worse Than Slavery: Parchman Farm and the Ordeal of Jim Crow Justice. New York: Free Press.
47.
PhelpsMS (2011) Rehabilitation in the punitive era: The gap between rhetoric and reality in U.S. prison programs. Law & Society Review45(1): 33–68.
48.
PhelpsMS (2017) Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society19(1): 53–73.
49.
PiersonP (2000a) Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review94(2): 251–267.
50.
PiersonP (2000b) Not just what, but when: Timing and sequence in political processes. Studies in American Political Development14(1): 72–92.
51.
RogersEM (2003) Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
52.
RubinAT (2015) A neo-institutional account of prison diffusion. Law & Society Review49(2): 365–399.
53.
RubinAT (2016) Penal change as penal layering: A case study of proto-prison adoption and capital punishment reduction, 1785–1822. Punishment & Society18(4): 420–441.
54.
RubinAT (2018) The prehistory of innovation: A longer view of penal change. Punishment & Society20(2): 192–216.
55.
RubinAT (2019a) Early US prison history beyond rothman: Revisiting the discovery of the asylum. Annual Review of Law and Social Science15(1): 137–154.
56.
RubinAT (2019b) History of the prison. IN: Mathieu Deflem (ed) The Handbook of Social Control. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 279–292.
57.
RubinAT (2019c) Interrogating the penal pendulum: An introduction to the review symposium on breaking the pendulum: The long struggle over criminal justice. Law & Social Inquiry44(3): 791–798.
58.
RubinAT (2019d) Punishment’s legal templates: A theory of formal penal change. Law & Society Review53(2): 518–553.
59.
RubinAT (2021) The Deviant Prison: Philadelphia’s Eastern State Penitentiary and the Origins of America’s Modern Penal System, 1829–1913. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
RubinAT (ND) Innovation and diffusion: Theorizing penal change before and after the ideal type. Manuscript in Progress (Available by Request).
61.
SavelsbergJJ (1994) Knowledge, domination, and criminal punishment. American Journal of Sociology99(4): 911–943.
62.
SavelsbergJJ (2014). Institutional theories of punishment. In: BruinsmaGWeisburdD (eds) Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice. New York, NY, Springer, 2542–2552
63.
SavelsbergJJ (2018) Punitive turn and justice cascade: Mutual inspiration from punishment and society and human rights literatures. Punishment & Society20(1): 73–91.
64.
SchoenfeldH (2010) Mass incarceration and the paradox of prison conditions litigation. Law & Society Review44(3-4): 731–768.
65.
SchoenfeldH (2014) The delayed emergence of penal modernism in Florida. Punishment & Society16(3): 258–284.
66.
SchoenfeldHA (2018) Building the Prison State: Race and the Politics of Mass Incarceration. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
67.
SeedsC (2017) Bifurcation nation: American penal policy in late mass incarceration. Punishment & Society19(5): 590–610.
68.
SewellWH (1996). Three temporalities: Toward an eventful sociology. In: McDonaldTJ (eds) The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 245–280.
69.
SimonJ (1993) Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Urban Underclass, 1890–1990. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70.
SimonJ (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
71.
SkocpolT (1979) States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
StinchcombeAL (1987[1968]) Constructing social theories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
73.
StuntzWJ (2011) The Collapse of American Criminal Justice. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
ThelenK (1999) Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science2(1): 369–404.
75.
ThelenK (2003). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In: MahoneyJRueschemeyerD (eds) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–240
76.
ThompsonE (1975) Whigs and Hunters: The Origins of the Black Act. New York: Pantheon Books.
77.
WallersteinI (1974) The Modern World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of European World? Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press.
78.
WeaverRK (2010) Paths and forks or chutes and ladders?: Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy30(2): 137–162.
