Utilizing the Feminist-Marxist lens of reproductive labor, I examine how the caring work and bodies of women who visit prisons are central to an analysis of the relationship of incarceration and social reproduction under capitalism. My research is based on participant observation and interviews with women prison visitors in 2014–2015 in Venezuela. I analyze how women bring food, clean laundry and otherwise approved items; they take long journeys, wait in lines for hours and pass through an invasive strip search so that they can visit their loved ones in prisons. This work is even more burdensome because the prisons operating under carceral self-rule—run by armed organizations of inmates through a de-facto privatization that centers not just survival but profit —fail to provide even the most basic necessities. I argue that the work of caring for a loved one in this context creates an additional burden on top of a job, housework, and community activism. This fourth shift requires that women’s labor be incorporated into a neoliberal carceral apparatus and also demonstrates that while the carceral zone is porous, the bodies of poor racialized women are used to enforce the prison border.
AntillanoAPojomovskyIZubillagaV, et al. (2016)
The Venezuelan prison: From neoliberalism to the Bolivarian revolution. Crime, Law and Social Change65(3): 195–211.
BenstonM (1969)
The political economy of women’s. Monthly Review21(4): 13–27.
4.
BiondiK (2016) Sharing This Walk: An Ethnography of Prison Life and the PCC in Brazil (Trans. JF Collins).
Chapel Hill:
University of North Carolina Press.
5.
BirkbeckC (2011)
Imprisonment and internment: Comparing penal institutions North and South. Punishment & Society13(3): 307–332.
6.
CarterJH (2017)
Neoliberal penology and criminal finance in Honduras. Prison Service Journal229: 10–14.
7.
Casey-AcevedoKBakkenT (2002)
Visiting women in prison: Who visits and who cares. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation34(3): 67–83.
8.
CastanedaN (2006) Creating a Caring Economy: Nora Castaneda and the Women’s Development Bank of Venezuela.
London, UK:
Crossroads Books.
9.
ChantS (2004) Urban livelihoods, employment and gender. In: Gwynne RN and Kay C (eds) Latin America Transformed: Globalization and Modernity. 2nd ed. London: Arnold, pp.211–231 (distributed in the United States of America by Oxford University Press).
10.
ChristianJ (2005)
Riding the bus: Barriers to prison visitation and family management strategies. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21(1): 31–48.
11.
Ciccariello-MaherG (2013) We Created Chávez: A People’s History of the Venezuelan Revolution.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
12.
ClarembauxP (2016) A Ese Infierno No Vuelvo: Un Viaje a Las Entrañas de Las Cárceles Venezolanas.
Ediciones Puntocero.
13.
ComfortML (2003)
In the tube at San Quentin: The “secondary prisonization” of women visiting inmates. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography32(1): 77–107.
14.
CrespoFABolañosMG (2009)
Código del preso: acerca de los efectos de la subcultura del prisionero. Capítulo Criminológico: revista de Las Disciplinas Del Control Social37(2): 53–72.
15.
Dalla CostaGF (1995) Development and economic crisis: Women’s labour and social policies in Venezuela in the context of international indebtedness. In: Costa MD and Costa GFD (eds) Paying the Price: Women and the Politics of International Economic Strategy.
London:
Zed Books, pp.91–116.
16.
Dalla CostaMJamesS (1975) The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. 3rd ed.
Bristol:
Falling Wall Press.
17.
DarkeSGarcesC (2017)
Surviving in the new mass carceral zone. Prison Service Journal229: 2–9.
18.
DavisAY (2003) Are Prisons Obsolete?Uitgawe and Revised and Updated to Include New Develop and B Edition.
New York:
Seven Stories Press.
19.
DixeyRWoodallJ (2012)
The significance of ‘the visit’ in an English category-B prison: Views from prisoners, prisoners’ families and prison staff. Community, Work & Family15(1): 29–47.
20.
FedericiS (1980) Wages against housework. In: MalosE (ed.) The Politics of Housework.
New York:
Allison & Busby, pp.253–261.
21.
FedericiS (2012) Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle.
USA:
PM Press.
22.
FedericiS (2014) Caliban and the Witch.
New York:
Autonomedia.
Fischer-HoffmanC (2008) Misión Madres Del Barrio: A Bolivarian social program recognizing housework and creating a caring economy in Venezuela. Thesis, University of Kansas.
27.
Fischer-HoffmanC (2020)
Rival carceralities: Legitimising discourses of prison regime formations in Bolivarian Venezuela. Journal of Latin American Studies52(2): 373–397.
28.
FleetwoodNR (2015)
Posing in prison: Family photographs, emotional labor, and carceral intimacy. Public Culture27(3(77)): 487–511.
29.
FolbreN (2002) The Invisible Heart: Economics and Family Values. 1st ed.
New York, NY:
The New Press.
30.
FontesAWO’NeillKL (2019)
La visita: Prisons and survival in Guatemala. Journal of Latin American Studies51(1): 85–107.
31.
FortunatiLFlemingJ (1995) The Arcane of Reproduction: Housework, Prostitution, Labor and Capital.
Brooklyn, NY:
Autonomedia.
32.
GarcesC (2014)
Denuding surveillance at the carceral boundary. South Atlantic Quarterly113(3): 447–473.
33.
GarcesCMartinTDarkeS (2013)
Informal prison dynamics in Africa and Latin America. Criminal Justice Matters91(1): 26–27.
34.
GilmoreRW (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. 1st ed.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
35.
GodoiR (2016)
Intimacy and power: Body searches and intimate visits in the prison system of São Paulo, Brazil. Champ pénal/Penal FieldXIII. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/champpenal/9386
HochschildAMachungA (2003) The Second Shift.
New York:
Penguin Books.
38.
Llavaneras BlancoM (2017)
The travels of an exotic bird: The transnational trajectories of Venezuela’s constitutional recognition of the value of unpaid work. Global Social Policy17(3): 328–346.
39.
MalosE (1980) The Politics of Housework.
London:
Allison & Busby (distributed in the U.S.A. by Schocken Books).
40.
MoranD (2013a)
Between outside and inside? Prison visiting rooms as liminal carceral spaces. GeoJournal78(2): 339–351.
41.
MoranD (2013b)
Carceral geography and the spatialities of prison visiting: Visitation, recidivism, and hyperincarceration. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space31(1): 174–190.
42.
MüllerM-M (2012)
The rise of the penal state in Latin America. Contemporary Justice Review15(1): 57–76.
43.
Observatorio Venezolano de Prisiones (2018) Informe 2018: Estar preson en Venezuelan as una condena de muerte. Available at: http://oveprisiones.com/informes/ (accessed 10 September 2019).
Pereyra IraolaV (2017) (
Im)mobilities around the carceral space: Gender relations and governmentality in federal prisons in Buenos Aires, Argentina. 1852-7175. Revista Transporte y Territorio. Available at: http://repositorio.filo.uba.ar/handle/filodigital/3280 (accessed 14 July 2020).
46.
Pereyra IraolaV (2018) Social reproduction: From welfare to the global prison? In: Elias J and Roberts A (eds) Handbook on the International Political Economy of Gender. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 225–240.
47.
Pereyra-IraolaVGunawardanaSJ (2019)
Carceral spaces and social reproduction: Exploring export processing zones in Sri Lanka and prisons in Argentina. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society26(4): 538–560.
