This study provides the first systematic, nationally representative analysis of administrative records of solitary confinement placements in any carceral setting. We examine patterns in who experiences solitary confinement in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody, as well as the stated reason for, and length of, their confinement. We reveal several findings. First, cases involving individuals with mental illnesses are overrepresented, more likely to occur without infraction, and to last longer, compared to cases involving individuals without mental illnesses. Second, solitary confinement cases involving immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean are vastly overrepresented in comparison to the share of these groups in the overall detained population, and African immigrants are more likely to be confined for disciplinary reasons, compared to the average. Finally, placement patterns vary significantly by facility and institution type, with private facilities more likely to solitarily confine people without infraction, compared to public facilities. This study offers a lens through which to more precisely theorize the legal boundary-blurring of crimmigration and the relationship between prison and immigration detention policies, to better understand the practice of solitary confinement across carceral contexts, and to analyze the relationship between national-level policy and on-the-ground implementation.
AhaltCWilliamsB (2016)
Reforming solitary-confinement policy – Heeding a presidential call to action. The New England Journal of Medicine374(18): 1704–1706.
2.
Ahalt C, Haney C, Ekhaugen K, et al. (2020) Role of a US -Norway Exchange in Placing Health and Well-Being at the Center of US Prison Reform. American Journal of Public Health 110(S1): S27–S29.
3.
Ahalt C, Peters C, Steward H, et al. (2019) Transforming Prison Culture to Improve Correctional Staff Wellness and Outcomes for Adults in Custody ‘The Oregon Way’: A Partnership Between the Oregon Department of Corrections and the University of California's Correctional Culture Change Program. Advancing Corrections Journal 10(8): 130–142.
4.
AleazizH (2019) More than 52,000 people are now being detained by ICE, an apparent all-time high. BuzzFeed News, 20 May. Available at: https://perma.cc/VWS6-W429 (accessed 12 October 2020).
5.
American Civil Liberties Union (2019) Still Worse Than Second-Class: Solitary Confinement of Women in the United States. New York: American Civil Liberties Union.
6.
ASCA and Liman Center (2016) Aiming to reduce time-in-cell: Reports from correctional systems on the numbers of prisoners in restricted housing and on the potential of policy changes to bring about reforms. Available at: https://perma.cc/5KD6-4AZJ (accessed 12 October 2020).
7.
Associated Press (2018) Young immigrants held for years in Virginia detention center claim horrific abuse. NBC News, 21 June. Available at: https://perma.cc/8TG5-BEES (accessed 12 October 2020).
8.
BarkerV (2009) The Politics of Imprisonment: How the Democratic Process Shapes the Way America Punishes Offenders.
Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
9.
BarkerV (2017)
Penal power at the border: Realigning state and nation. Theoretical Criminology21(4): 441–457.
10.
BeckAJ (2015) Use of Restrictive Housing in U.S. Prisons and Jails, 2011–12.
NCJ 249209. Washington, DC:
Bureau of Justice Statistics.
11.
BeckettKEvansH (2015)
Crimmigration at the local level: Criminal justice processes in the shadow of deportation. Law & Society Review49(1): 241–277.
BosworthM (2017)
Immigration detention, punishment and the transformation of justice. Social & Legal Studies28(1): 81–99.
14.
BosworthMFrankoKPickeringS (2018)
Punishment, globalization and migration control: ‘Get them the hell out of here. Punishment & Society20(1): 34–53.
15.
BrouwerJ (2020)
Bordered penality in The Netherlands: The experiences of foreign national prisoners and prison officers in a crimmigration prison. Punishment & Society22(5): 703–722.
16.
CampbellMC (2011)
Politics, prisons, and law enforcement: An examination of the emergence of “law and order” politics in Texas. Law & Society Review45(3): 631–665.
17.
CampbellMCSchoenfeldH (2013)
The transformation of America’s penal order: A historicized political sociology of punishment. American Journal of Sociology118(5): 1375–1423.
18.
ChaconJM (2012)
Overcriminalizing immigration symposium on overcriminalization. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology102(3): 613–652.
19.
ChoE (2020)
The trump administration weakens standards for ICE detention facilities.ACLU News and Commentary, 14 January. Available at: https://perma.cc/W7NB-DV9T (accessed 12 October 2020).
20.
ClarkK (2018)
The effect of mental illness on segregation following institutional misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior45(9): 1363–1382.
21.
CleveNGVMayesL (2015)
Criminal justice through “colorblind” lenses: A call to examine the mutual constitution of race and criminal justice. Law & Social Inquiry40(2): 406–432.
22.
CloudDAugustineDAhaltC, et al. (2020).
The ethical use of medical Isolation - Not solitary confinement - to reduce COVID-19 transmission in correctional settings.Amend, 9 April. Available at: https://perma.cc/67ZD-MR6C (accessed 12 October 2020).
23.
CohenF (2014)
Long-term penal isolation: A problem solving symposium. Correctional Law Reporter26(1): 1.
24.
CreweB (2011)
Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society13(5): 509–529.
25.
DolovichS (2012)
Forms of deference in prison law. Federal Sentencing Reporter24(4): 245–259.
26.
EaglyIV (2010)
Prosecuting immigration. Northwestern University Law Review104(4): 1281–1360.
27.
EaglyIVShaferS (2015)
A national study of access to counsel in immigration court. University of Pennsylvania Law Review164(1): 91.
28.
García HernándezCC (2014)
Immigration detention as punishment. Immigration and Nationality Law Review35: 385–454.
29.
GilmoreRW (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California.
Berkeley, CA:
University of California Press.
30.
Golash-BozaT (2015) Deported: Immigrant Policing, Disposable Labor, and Global Capitalism.
New York, NY:
New York University Press.
31.
Golash-BozaT (2016)
The parallels between mass incarceration and mass deportation: An intersectional analysis of state repression. Journal of World-Systems Research22(2): 484–509.
32.
HaneyC (2018)
The psychological effects of solitary confinement: A systematic critique. Crime and Justice47(1): 365–416.
33.
HasselbergI (2016) Enduring Uncertainty: Deportation, Punishment and Everyday Life.
New York, NY:
Berghahn Books.
34.
KabaFLewisAGlowa-KollischS, et al. (2014)
Solitary confinement and risk of Self-Harm among jail inmates. American Journal of Public Health104(3): 442–447.
35.
KingRDMassogliaMUggenC (2012)
Employment and exile: U.S. Criminal deportations, 1908–2005. American Journal of Sociology117(6): 1786–1825.
36.
KoxMBooneMStaringR (2020)
The pains of being unauthorized in The Netherlands. Punishment & Society22(4): 534–552.
37.
KranerNBarrowcloughNWeissC, et al. (2016). 51 – Jurisdiction Survey of Juvenile Solitary Confinement Rules in Juvenile Justice Systems. USA: Lowenstein Center for Public Interest.
38.
KupersTA (2017) Solitary: The inside Story of Supermax Isolation and How We Can Abolish It.
Oakland, CA:
University of California Press.
39.
KurkiLMorrisN (2001)
The purposes, practices, and problems of supermax prisons. Crime and Justice28: 385–424.
40.
LabrecqueRM (2019)
Assessing the impact of time spent in restrictive housing confinement on subsequent measures of institutional adjustment among men in prison. Criminal Justice and Behavior46(10): 1445–1455.
41.
LongazelJBermanJFleury-SteinerB (2016)
The pains of immigrant imprisonment. Sociology Compass10(11): 989–998.
42.
LovellD (2008)
Patterns of disturbed behavior in a supermax population. Criminal Justice and Behavior35(8): 985–1004.
43.
LovellDCloyesKAllenD (2000)
Who lives in super-maximum custody – A Washington state study. Federal Probation64(2): 33–38.
44.
LovellDJohnsonLCCainKC (2007)
Recidivism of supermax prisoners in Washington state. Crime & Delinquency53(4): 633–656.
45.
LovellDTochH (2011)
Some observations about the Colorado segregation study. Correctional Mental Health Report13(1): 3–6.
46.
LundahlBWKunzCBrownellC, et al. (2009)
Prison privatization: A meta-analysis of cost and quality of confinement indicators. Research on Social Work Practice19(4): 383–394.
47.
LynchMP (2010) Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment. Critical Perspectives on Crime and Law.
Stanford, CA:
Stanford Law Books.
48.
Mehta S (2010) Deportation by Default: Mental Disability, Unfair Hearings, and Indefinite Detention in the US Immigration System. New York, NY: American Civil Liberties Union.
49.
MorganRDGendreauPSmithP, et al. (2016)
Quantitative syntheses of the effects of administrative segregation on inmates’ well-being. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law22(4): 439–461.
50.
NadayAFreilichJDMellowJ (2008)
The elusive data on supermax confinement. The Prison Journal88(1): 69–93.
51.
PatlerCBranicN (2017)
Patterns of family visitation during immigration detention. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences3(4): 18–36.
52.
PatlerC andGolash-BozaTM (2017)
The fiscal and human costs of immigrant detention and deportation in the United States. Sociology Compass11(11): e12536.
53.
PatlerCSachaJOBranicN (2019)
The black box within a black box: Solitary confinement practices in a subset of U.S. Immigrant detention facilities. Journal of Population Research35(4): 435–465.
54.
PlevinR (2020) ‘This death was preventable’: Family asks state to probe 74-year-old’s suicide in ICE detention. Desert Sun, 7 August. Available at: https://perma.cc/UJ94-AA2N (accessed 12 October 2020).
55.
ProvineDMVarsanyiMLewisPG, et al. (2016). Policing Immigrants: Local Law Enforcement on the Front Lines.
Chicago, IL:
The University of Chicago Press.
56.
PyroozDCMitchellMM (2019)
The use of restrictive housing on gang and Non-Gang affiliated inmates in U.S. Prisons: Findings from a national survey of correctional agencies. Justice Quarterly37(4): 590–526.
57.
ReiterK (2012)
Parole, snitch, or die: California’s supermax prisons and prisoners, 1997–2007. Punishment & Society14(5): 530–563.
58.
ReiterK (2015)
Supermax administration and the eighth amendment: Discretion, deference, and Double-Bunking, 1986–2010. University of California Irvine Law Review5(1): 530–563.
59.
ReiterK (2016a) 23/7: Pelican Bay Prison and the Rise of Long-Term Solitary Confinement.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
60.
ReiterK (2016b)
Reclaiming the power to punish: Legislating and administrating the California supermax, 1982–1989. Law & Society Review50(2): 484–518.
61.
ReiterKBlairT (2015) Punishing mental illness: Trans-institutionalization and solitary confinement in the United States. In: Reiter K and Koenig A (eds) Extreme Punishment. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.177–196.
62.
ReiterKBlairT (2018)
Superlative subjects, institutional futility, and the limits of punishment. Berkeley Journal of Criminal Law23(3): 162.
63.
ReiterKCoutinSB (2017)
Crossing borders and criminalizing identity: The disintegrated subjects of administrative sanctions. Law & Society Review51(3): 567–601.
64.
ReiterKVenturaJLovellD, et al. (2020)
Psychological distress in solitary confinement: Symptoms, severity, and prevalence in the United States, 2017–2018. American Journal of Public Health110(S1): S56–S62.
65.
ResnikJ (2020) Not isolating isolation. In: Lobel J and Smith P (eds) Solitary Confinement: Effects, Practices, and Pathways Toward Reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 89–116.
66.
RubinATReiterK (2018)
Continuity in the face of penal innovation: Revisiting the history of American solitary confinement. Law & Social Inquiry43(4): 1604–1632.
67.
RyoEPeacockI (2018)
A national study of immigration detention in the United States. Southern California Law Review92(1): 1–68.
68.
SaadiADeTYoungM-EPatlerC, et al. (2020)
Understanding US immigration detention. Health and Human Rights22(1): 187–197.
69.
SaadiATesemaL (2019)
Privatisation of immigration detention facilities. Lancet393(10188): 2299.
70.
SakodaRTSimesJT (2020) Solitary confinement and the U.S. prison boom. Criminal Justice Policy Review. doi: 10.1177/0887403419895315.
71.
El SayedSAMorrisRGDeShayRA, et al. (2020). Comparing the rates of misconduct between private and public prisons in Texas. Crime & Delinquency 66(9): 1217–1241.
72.
ScheptJ (2013) ‘
A lockdown facility … with the feel of a small, private college’: Liberal politics, jail expansion, and the carceral habitus. Theoretical Criminology17(1): 71–88.
73.
SchlangerM (2013)
Prison segregation: Symposium introduction and preliminary data on racial disparities introduction. Michigan Journal of Race and Law18(2): 241–250.
74.
SchoenfeldH (2010)
Mass incarceration and the paradox of prison conditions litigation. Law & Society Review44(3–4): 731–768.
75.
SchwellenbackNSteinleMHawkinsK, et al. (2019).
Isolated: ICE confines some detainees with mental illness in solitary for months.Project on Government Oversight, 14 August. Available at: https://perma.cc/3Z8Y-8NZV (accessed 27 September 2019).
76.
ShapiroDM (2019)
Solitary confinement in the young republic. Harvard Law Review133(2): 542–598.
77.
SpivakALSharpSF (2008)
Inmate recidivism as a measure of private prison performance. Crime & Delinquency54(3): 482–508.
78.
StumpfJ (2006)
The crimmigration crisis: Immigrants, crime, and sovereign power. American University Law Review56(2): 367–420.
79.
TascaMTuranovicJ (2018) Examining race and gender disparities in restrictive housing placements. W.E.B. Du Bois Program of Research on Race and Crime 252062. Washington, DC, USA: National Institute of Justice.
TRAC (2020) Decline in ICE Detainees with Criminal Records Could Shape Agency’s Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. Syracuse, NY: TRAC.
82.
UN News (2011) Solitary confinement should be banned in most cases, UN expert says. UN News, 18 October. Available at: https://perma.cc/EY83-4LA3 (accessed 12 October 2020).
83.
United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (2016) A/RES/70/175. Available at: https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/175 (accessed 12 October 2020).
84.
Unlock the Box (2020) Solitary Confinement is Never the Answer. Available at: https://perma.cc/ZZ6N-862C (accessed 12 October 2020).
85.
UrbinaIRentzC (2013) Immigrants held in solitary confinement cells, often for weeks. The New York Times, 23 March. Available at: https://perma.cc/W8AF-ATVH.
86.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) (2013) Review of the use of segregation for ICE detainees, Memo 11065.1. Available at: https://perma.cc/8GHX-VL8V (accessed 27 September 2019).
87.
van der WoudeMAHvan der LeunJPNijlandJ-AA (2014)
Crimmigration in The Netherlands. Law & Social Inquiry39(3): 560–579.
88.
WilliamsBLiAAhaltC, et al. (2019)
The cardiovascular health burdens of solitary confinement. Journal of General Internal Medicine34(10): 1977–1980.
89.
WoodmanSSalehMRappleyeH, et al. (2019).
Solitary voices: Thousands of immigrants suffer in solitary confinement in ICE detention.The Intercept, 20 May. Available at: https://perma.cc/Y2QJ-A2SS (accessed 12 October 2020).
