Electronic monitoring, often accompanied with house arrest, is used extensively across the United States as a means of pretrial supervision and as a condition of probation and parole. In this article, we bridge the literatures of procedural punishment and carceral geography to detail how this previously understudied process of transport from jail to electronic monitoring serves not just as a necessary bureaucratic process, but as a key moment of punishment and power. Utilizing in-depth interviews with 60 people who were currently or recently on EM in Cook County, IL, we argue that this moment of transport is itself a punitive experience. We find that sheriff’s officers involved in the transport process punish individuals through the manipulation of time and space, verbal threats, and infantilization. This punishment in transport instills a subjugated status that sets the tone for the EM experience, aiding in reinforcing the home as the new carceral space.
ArmstrongS (2015)
The cell and the corridor: Imprisonment as waiting, and waiting as mobile. Time & Society27(2): 133–154.
3.
AuyeroJ (2012) Patients of the State: The Politics of Waiting in Argentina.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
4.
BisharaA (2015)
Driving while Palestinian in Israel and the West Bank: The politics of disorientation and the routes of a subaltern knowledge. American Ethnologist42(1): 33–54.
5.
CadiganMKirkG (2020)
On thin ice: Bureaucratic processes of monetary sanctions & job insecurity. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences6(1): 113–131.
FeeleyM (1979) The Process is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court.
New York:
Russel Sage Foundation.
12.
FeeleyM (2002)
Entrepreneurs of punishment: The legacy of privatization. Punishment & Society4(3): 321–344.
13.
FoucaultM (1979) Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Translated by Alan Sheridan).
New York:
Random House.
14.
GableRKGableRS (2005)
Electronic monitoring: Positive intervention strategies. Federal Probation69: 21–25.
15.
GacekJ (2019)
Stuck in the carceral web: Prisoners' experiences of electronic monitoring?Criminological Encounters2(1): 35–52.
16.
GaineyRRPayneBK (2000)
Understanding the experience of house arrest with electronic monitoring: An analysis of quantitative and qualitative data. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology44(1): 84–96.
17.
GillN (2016) Mobility versus liberty? The punitive uses of movement within and outside carceral environments. In: GillNMoranD (eds) Carceral Spaces: Mobility and Agency in Imprisonment and Migrant Detention.
Surrey:
Ashgate Publishing, pp.19–36.
18.
GillNConlonDMoranD, et al. (2016)
Carceral circuitry: New directions in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 183–204.
19.
GilmoreRW (2007) Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
20.
Gonzalez Van CleveN (2016) Crook County: Racism and Injustice in America's Largest Criminal Court.
Stanford:
Stanford University Press.
21.
Gonzalez Van CleveN (2018) The Waiting Room. Amazon Original Stories.
22.
HaneyCZimbardoPG (2009)
Persistent dispositionalism in interactionist clothing: Fundamental attribution error in explaining prison abuse. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin35(6): 807–814.
23.
JacobsA (2004)
Prison power corrupts absolutely: Exploring the phenomenon of prison guard brutality and the need to develop a system of accountability comment. California Western Law Review41(1): 277–302.
24.
JäggiLJMezukBWatkinsDC, et al. (2016)
The relationship between trauma, arrest, and incarceration history among Black Americans: Findings from the National Survey of American Life. Society and Mental Health6(3): 187–206.
25.
KilgoreJ (2013)
Progress or more of the same? Electronic monitoring and parole in the age of mass incarceration. Critical Criminology21(1): 123–139.
26.
KirkG (2020) The limits of expectations and the minimization of collateral consequences: The experience of electronic home monitoring. Social Problems. Epub ahead of print 9 May 2020. DOI: 10.1093/socpro/spaa021.
27.
Kohler-HausmannI (2018) Misdemeanorland: Criminal Courts and Social Control in an Age of Broken Windows Policing.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
28.
MartinKDSykesBLShannonS, et al. (2018)
Monetary sanctions: Legal financial obligations in US systems of justice. Annual Review of Criminology1(1): 471–495.
29.
MayJThriftN (2001) Timespace: Geographies of Temporality.
London:
Routledge.
30.
MinckeC (2017) Prison: Legitimacy through mobility? In: TurnerJPetersK (eds) Carceral Mobilities: Interrogating Movement in Incarceration.
New York:
Routledge, pp.236–249.
31.
MoranD (2012) “
Doing Time” in carceral space: Timespace and carceral geography. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography94(4): 305–316.
32.
MoranDPiacentiniLPallotJ (2012)
Disciplined mobility and carceral geography: Prisoner transport in Russia. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers37(3): 446–460.
33.
MoranDTurnerJSchlieheA (2017)
Conceptualizing the carceral in carceral geography. Progress in Human Geography42(5): 666–686.
34.
OlsonDETahierS (2012) Population dynamics and the characteristics of inmates in the Cook County. Report, Cook County Sheriff's Reentry Council, Chicago, IL.
35.
PhelpsMS (2017)
Mass probation: Towards a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society19(1): 53–73.
36.
RubinAT (2012)
The unintended consequences of penal reform: A case study of penal transportation in eighteenth-century London. Law & Society Review46(4): 815–851.
37.
Scott-HaywardCFradellaHF (2019) Punishing Poverty: How Bail and Pretrial Detention Fuel Inequalities in the Criminal Justice System.
Oakland, CA:
University of California Press.
38.
SextonL (2015)
Penal subjectivities: Developing a theoretical framework for penal consciousness. Punishment & Society17(1): 114–136.
39.
SparksRGacekJ (2019)
Persistent puzzles: The philosophy and ethics of private corrections in the context of contemporary penality. Criminology & Public Policy18(2): 379–399.
40.
SvenssonBSvenssonK (2006) Inmate in motion: metamorphosis as governmentality: A case of social logistics. University of Lund Working Paper Series 2006:5.
41.
ThompsonHA (2017) Blood in the Water: The Attica Prison Uprising of 1971 and Its Legacy.
New York:
Pantheon.
42.
TurnerJPetersK (2016)
Rethinking mobility in criminology: Beyond horizontal mobilities of prisoner transportation. Punishment & Society19(1): 96–114.
43.
VanhaelemeeschDVander BekenT (2014)
Between convict and ward: The experiences of people living with offenders subject to electronic monitoring. Crime, Law and Social Change62(4): 389–415.
44.
VanhaelemeeschDVander BekenTVandeveldeS (2014)
Punishment at home: Offenders’ experiences with electronic monitoring. European Journal of Criminology11(3): 273–287.
45.
WeaverVMLermanAE (2010)
Political consequences of the carceral state. American Political Science Review104(4): 817–833.
46.
WorleyRMWorleyVB (2011)
Guards gone wild: A self-report study of correctional officer misconduct and the effect of institutional deviance on ‘care’ within the Texas prison system. Deviant Behavior32(4): 293–319.
