Following the general rise of incarceration rates in Latin America, two general frameworks have been influential in attempting to explain the phenomenon: the neoliberal and the state transformation theses. The article takes the case of Chile, the Latin American model of neoliberal governance, to test the broad explanatory power of both frameworks. By doing so, it shows that the connection with a narrative of substitution has distortive potential. Although the Chilean case does show that investment in state capacity augmentation and output maximization mechanisms did have direct effects on incarceration rates, no change in the project of control through criminal justice can be appreciated. Rather than changing its orientation towards the type of social control it provides for, the system still stands for the traditional Latin American project of control of a large, marginalized population through confinement.
AlcainoE (2018) Derechos humanos de los privados de libertad. Las cárceles en Chile. ¿Avances o mantenimiento del status quo? In: VialT (ed.) Informe Anual Sobre Derechos Humanos En Chile.
Santiago:
Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales, pp.381–403.
2.
AriasED (2006)
The dynamics of criminal governance: Networks and social order in Rio de Janeiro. Journal of Latin American Studies38(2): 293–325.
3.
ArizaLJIturraldeM (2018) Transformations of the crime control field in Colombia. In: CarringtonKHoggRScottJ, et al. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South.
Cham:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp.687–708.
4.
AtriaF (2013a) La Constitución Tramposa.
Santiago:
LOM Ediciones.
5.
AtriaF (2013b) Neoliberalismo Con Rostro Humano.
Santiago:
Catalonia.
6.
AtriaFSalgadoCWilenmannJ (2017) Democracia y Neutralización.
Santiago:
LOM Ediciones.
7.
BeckettKGodoyA (2008) Power, politics, and penality: Punitiveness as backlash in American democracies. In: SaratA (ed.) Studies in Law, Politics, and Society.
Vol. 45.
Bingley: Emerald, pp.139–173.
8.
BirkbeckC (2011)
Imprisonment and internment: Comparing penal institutions north and south. Punishment & Society13(3): 307–332.
9.
BorzutzkySSanhuezaCSehnbruchK (2014) Reducing poverty: Real or rhetorical success? In: SehnbruchKSiavelisP (eds) Democratic Chile. The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010.
Boulder, CO/London:
Lynne Riener Publishers, pp.221–241.
10.
BrashearL (2012)
Chile’s Criminal Law Reform: Enhancing defendants’ rights and citizen security. Latin American Politics and Society54(3): 65–93.
11.
CabelloL (2018) Informe: principales problemas detectados en las visitas de cárceles realizadas el año 2017 por los fiscales judiciales.
Santiago.
12.
CaoLZhaoJS (2005)
Confidence in the police in Latin America. Journal of Criminal Justice33(5): 403–412.
13.
CarringtonKHoggRSozzoM (2016)
Southern criminology. British Journal of Criminology56: 1–20.
14.
ChevignyP (2003)
The populism of fear. Punishment & Society5(1): 77–96.
15.
CohenS (1985) Visions of Social Control.
Glasgow:
Polity Press.
16.
CooperJM (2008)
Competing legal cultures and legal reform: The battle of Chile. Michigan Journal of International Law29(3): 501–563.
17.
CorreaC (2017) La prisión preventiva a la luz de las reformas introducidas al Código Procesal Penal. In: AmbosK (ed.) Reformas Penales.
Santiago:
DER Ediciones, pp.295–326.
18.
CorreaJ (1999) Cenicienta se Queda en la Fiesta. El Poder Judicial Chileno en la Década de los 90. In: DrakePJaksicI (eds) El Modelo Chileno. Democracia y Desarrollo En Los Noventa.
Santiago:
LOM Ediciones, pp.281–315.
19.
DammertL (2006) From public security to citizen security in Chile. In: BaileyJDammertL (eds) Public Security and Police Reform in the Americas.
Pittsburgh, PA:
University of Pittsburgh Press, pp.58–74.
20.
DammertLMaloneMFT (2003)
Fear of crime or fear of life? Public insecurities in Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research22(1): 79–101.
21.
DammertLMaloneMFT (2006)
Does it take a village? Policing strategies and fear of crime in Latin America. Latin American Politics & Society48(4): 27–51.
22.
De GiorgiA (2013) Punishment and political economy. In: SimonJSparksR (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society.
London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Dehli:
Sage Publications, pp.40–59.
23.
DeShazoPVargasJE (2006) Evaluación de La Reforma Judicial En América Latina.
Santiago:
CEJA.
24.
FonsecaDS (2018a)
Expansion, standardization, and densification of the criminal justice apparatus: Recent developments in Brazil. Punishment & Society20(3): 329–350.
25.
FonsecaDS (2018b)
Reimagining the sociology of punishment through the global-south: Postcolonial social control and modernization discontents. Punishment & Society20(1): 54–72.
26.
FrühlingH (2009)
Research on Latin American police: Where do we go from here?.Police Practice and Research10(5–6): 465–481.
27.
GarlandD (1990) Punishment and Modern Society.
Oxford/New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
28.
GarlandD (2002) The Culture of Control.
Oxford/New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
29.
GarlandD (2018)
Theoretical advances and problems in the sociology of punishment. Punishment & Society20(1): 8–33.
30.
GodoyA (2004)
When justice is criminal: Lynchings in contemporary Latin America. Theory and Society33(6): 621–651.
31.
GodoyA (2005)
Converging on the poles: Contemporary punishment and democracy in hemispheric perspective. Law and Social Inquiry30(3): 515–548.
32.
GonzálezC (2018) Gestión, Gerencialismo y Sistema Penal.
Montevideo:
BdeF.
33.
GonzálezYM (2017)
“What citizens can see of the state”: Police and the construction of democratic citizenship in Latin America. Theoretical Criminology21(4): 494–511.
34.
HallSCritcherCJeffersonT, et al. (1978) Policing the Crisis.
London/Basingstoke:
The Macmillan Press.
35.
HathazyP (2013) (
Re)Shaping the neoliberal leviathans: The politics of penality and welfare in Argentina, Chile and Peru. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies95: 5–25.
36.
HathazyP (2016)
Punitivism with a judicial face: Criminal justice reformers’s international and regional strategies and penal state-making in Argentina, Chile and beyond. Kriminologisches Journal48(4): 294–310.
37.
HathazyPMüllerMM (2016)
The rebirth of the prison in Latin America: Determinants, regimes and social effects. Crime, Law and Social Change65(3): 113–135.
38.
HersantJ (2017)
Patronage and rationalization: Reform to criminal procedure and the lower courts in Chile. Law & Social Inquiry42(2): 423–449.
39.
HilbinkL (2007) Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
40.
HuberE (2009)
Politics and inequality in Latin America. PS: Political Science & Politics42(4): 651–655.
41.
HuberENielsenFStephensJD, et al. (2006)
Politics and inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean. American Sociological Review71(6): 943–963.
42.
HuneeusC (2014) La Democracia Semisoberana.
Santiago:
Taurus.
IturraldeM (2008)
Emergency penality and authoritarian liberalism: Recent trends in Colombian criminal policy. Theoretical Criminology12(3): 377–397.
45.
IturraldeM (2010)
Democracies without citizenship: Crime and punishment in Latin America. New Criminal Law Review13(2): 309–332.
46.
IturraldeM (2018) Neoliberalism and its impact on Latin American crime control fields. Theoretical Criminology 23(4): 471--490.
47.
JohnsonDL (1983)
Class formation and struggle in Latin America. Latin American Perspectives10(2): 2–18.
48.
LaceyN (2008) The Prisoner’s Dilemma.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
49.
LaceyNSoskiceDHopeD (2018)
Understanding the determinants of penal policy: Crime, culture, and comparative political economy. Annual Review of Criminology1: 195–220.
50.
LanderretcheÓ (2014) Economic policy and the ideology of stability. In: SehnbruchKSiavelisP (eds) Democratic Chile. The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010.
Boulder, CO/London:
Lynne Riener Publishers, pp.173–197.
51.
LangerM (2007)
Revolution in Latin American criminal procedure: Diffusion of legal ideas from the periphery. The American Journal of Comparative Law55: 617–676.
52.
Lappi‐SeppäläT (2008)
Trust, welfare, and political culture: Explaining differences in national penal policies. Crime and Justice37(1): 313–387.
53.
MacaulayF (2007)
Knowledge production, framing and criminal justice reform in Latin. Journal of Latin American Studies39(3): 627–651.
54.
MatusJP (2011)
Origen, consolidación y vigencia de la Nueva Dogmática Chilena. Politica Criminal6(11): 44–105.
55.
MelossiD (2011) Neoliberalism’s ‘elective affinities’: Penality, political economy, and international relations. In: MelossiDSozzoMSparksR (eds) Travels of the Criminal Question: Cultural Embeddedness and Diffusion.
Oxford:
Hart Publishing, pp.45–64.
56.
MoralesAM (2012)
La política criminal contemporánea: Influencia en Chile del discurso de la ley y el orden. Política Criminal7(13): 94–146.
57.
MüllerMM (2012)
The rise of the penal state in Latin America. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice15(1): 57–76.
58.
MüllerMM (2016)
Penalizing democracy: Punitive politics in neoliberal Mexico. Crime, Law and Social Change65(3): 227–249.
59.
NivetteA (2016)
Institutional ineffectiveness, Ilegitimacy, and public support for vigilantism in Latin America. Criminology54: 142–175.
60.
O’DonnellG (2010) Democracy, Agency, and the State.
New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
61.
O’MalleyP (1999)
Volatile and contradictory punishment. Theoretical Criminology3(2): 175–796.
62.
PalaciosD (2011)
La reforma procesal penal en Chile: Nuevos agentes, sus trayectorias y la reestructuración de un campo. Revista Política49(2): 43–70.
63.
PortesA (1997)
Neoliberalism and the sociology of development: Emerging trends and unanticipated. Population and Development Review23(2): 229–259.
64.
RiegoC (2000) Chile. In: MaierJAmbosKWoischnikJ (eds) Las Reformas Procesales En Latinoamérica.
Buenos Aires:
Ad-Hoc, pp.167–195.
65.
SaffordF (2013) The construction of national states in Latin America, 1820–1890. In: CentenoMAFerraroA (eds) State and Nation Making in Latin America and Spain.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press, pp.25–55.
66.
SalineroS (2012) “
Por qué aumenta la población carcelaria en Chile”.Revista Ius et Praxis18(1): 113–150.
67.
SavelsbergJJ (1994)
Knowledge, domination, and criminal punishment. American Journal of Sociology99(4): 911–943.
68.
ScheingoldS (1984) The Politics of Law and Order.
New York, NY:
Longman.
69.
SehnbruchKSiavelisP (2014) Political and economic life under the rainbow. In: SehbruchKSiavelisP (eds) Democratic Chile. The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010.
Boulder, CO/London:
Lynne Riener Publishers, pp.1–12.
70.
SiavelisP (2014) From a necessary to a permanent coalition. In: SehnbruchKSiavelisP (eds) Democratic Chile. The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010.
Boulder, CO/London:
Lynne Riener Publishers, pp.15–41.
71.
SimonJ (2007) Governing through Crime.
Oxford/New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
72.
SimonJSparksR (2013) Punishment and society: The emergence of an academic field. In: SimonJSparksR (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Punishment and Society.
London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Dehli:
Sage Publications.
73.
SoiferHD (2015) State Building in Latin America.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
74.
SozzoM (2016)
Democratization, politics and punishment in Argentina. Punishment & Society18(3): 301–324.
75.
SozzoM (2018) Beyond the neoliberal penalty thesis? Punitive turn and political change in South America. In: CarringtonKHoggRScottJ, et al. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South.
Cham:
Palgrave Macmillan, pp.659–685.
76.
StippelJ (2012) Cárcel, Derecho y Política.
Santiago:
LOM Ediciones.
77.
StruenseeEMaierJ (2000) Introducción. In: MaierJAmbosKWoischnikJ (eds) Las Reformas Procesales En Latinoamérica.
Buenos Aires:
Ad-Hoc, pp.17–32.
78.
TonryM (2007)
Determinants of penal policies. Crime and Justice36(1): 1–48.
WacquantL (2000) Punishing the Poor.
Durham, NC/London:
Duke University Press.
81.
WacquantL (2001)
The penalisation of poverty and the rise of neo-liberalism. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research9(4): 401–412.
82.
WacquantL (2003)
Notes on the penalization of poverty in Brazil. Punishment & Society5(2): 197–205.
83.
WaldmannP (2002) Der Anomische Staat.
Wiesbaden:
Springer Fachmedien.
84.
WeeksG (2014) The military and the twenty years of the concertación. In: SehnbruchKSiavelisP (eds) Democratic Chile. The Politics and Policies of a Historic Coalition, 1990–2010.
Boulder, CO/London:
Lynne Riener Publishers, pp.103–117.
85.
WeylandK (2004)
Assessing Latin American neoliberalism: Introduction to a debate. Latin American Research Review39(3): 143–149.
86.
WilenmannJDel FierroNMedinaF, et al. (2019)
La determinación de la pena en la práctica judicial chilena. Política Criminal14(27): 456–490.
87.
ZimringF (2005)
Penal policy and penal legislation in recent American experience. Stanford Law Review58(1): 323–338.
