Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drawing on interviews with 76 prisoners, 47 prison staff, and 14 experts, we document lived experiences of punishment in the Danish prison context. We argue that, regardless of “humanizing” elements of normalization and humanity, prisoners and staff may experience the power of the carceral state in Denmark in ways similar to those under more obviously harsh confinement regimes, as exist in the United States and, to a lesser extent, in the United Kingdom. Ultimately, macro-level theories like Scandinavian Exceptionalism serve as a rhetorical tool, implying that harsher prison systems are fixable, but fail to reflect the micro-level realities of incarceration.

Keywords

Denmark exceptionalism pains of imprisonment prison solitary confinement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aas

(2014) Bordered penality: Precarious membership and abnormal justice. Punishment & Society 16(5): 520–541.

Ashworth

and Zedner

(2014) Preventive Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barker

(2013) Nordic exceptionalism revisited: Explaining the paradox of a Janus-faced penal regime. Theoretical Criminology 17(1): 5–25.

Beck

(2015) Use of Restrictive Housing in U.S. Prisons and Jails, 2011-12. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

Bloom

and Chesney-Lind

(2000) Women in prison: Vengeful equity. In: Gabel

and Johnston

(eds) Children of Incarcerated Parents. New York: Lexington Books, pp.283–304.

Campbell

and Schoenfeld

(2013) The transformation of America’s penal order: A historicized political sociology of punishment. American Journal of Sociology 118(5): 1375–1423.

Charmaz

(2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Christie

(1981) Limits to Pain. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock.

Crewe

(2007) Power, adaptation and resistance in a late-modern men’s prison. British Journal of Criminology 47(2): 256–275.

10.

Crewe

(2011) Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society 13(5): 509–529.

11.

Danish Prison and Probation Service (2015) In Brief. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Prison and Probation Service. Report on file with authors.

12.

DIGNITY (Danish Institute Against Torture) (2017) The Use of Solitary Confinement as a Disciplinary Measure in Denmark. Copenhagen, Denmark: DIGNITY (Discussion Paper, On File with Authors).

13.

Downes

(1988) Contrasts in Tolerance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

14.

Emerson

Fretz

and Shaw

(1995) Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

15.

Fredwall

(2017) Prison officer ideals in a Norwegian welfare context. In: Smith

and Ugelvik

(eds) Embraced by the Welfare State? Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. London, UK: Palgrave-MacMillan.

16.

Garland

(2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

Goodman

(2011) From “Observation Dude” to “An Observational Study”: Gaining access and conducting research inside a paramilitary organization. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 26(3): 599–605.

18.

Hannah-Moffat

and Lynch

(2012) Theorizing punishment’s boundaries: An introduction. Theoretical Criminology 16(2): 119–121.

19.

Johnson

and McGunigall-Smith

(2008) Life without parole, America’s other death penalty. The Prison Journal 88(2): 328–346.

20.

Jones

and Newburn

(2002) Policy convergence and crime control in the USA and the UK: Streams of influence and levels of impact. Criminal Justice 2(2): 173–203.

21.

Lancaster

(2017) How to end mass incarceration. The Jacobin, August. Available at: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/08/mass-incarceration-prison-abolition-policing (accessed 6 October 2017).

22.

Larson

(2013) Why Scandinavian prisons are superior. The Atlantic, September 24. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/09/why-scandinavian-prisons-are-superior/279949/ (accessed 6 October 2017).

23.

Liebling

(1999) Doing research in prison: Breaking the silence. Theoretical Criminology 3(2): 147–173.

24.

Liebling

(2011) Moral performance, inhuman and degrading treatment and prison pain. Punishment & Society 13(5): 530–550.

25.

Logan C (1993) Criminal justice performance measures for prison. In: Performance Measures for the Criminal Justice System, NCJ 143505. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics – Princeton University Study Group on Criminal Justice Performance Measures, pp.19–59

26.

Lynch

(2000) Rehabilitation as rhetoric: The idea of reformation in contemporary parole discourse and practice. Punishment and Society 2(1): 40–65.

27.

Lynch

(2011) Mass incarceration, legal change, and locale Understanding and remediating American penal overindulgence. Criminology & Public Policy 10(3): 673–698.

28.

Melossi

Mazimo

and Sparks

(eds) (2011) Travels of the Criminal Question: Cultural Embeddedness and Diffusion. Portland, OR: Hart.

29.

Méndez

(2011) Interim report of the Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. United Nations General Assembly, 66th Session, Item 69(b), A/66/268, August 5. Available at: http://solitaryconfinement.org/uploads/SpecRapTortureAug2011.pdf (accessed 6 October 2017).

30.

Olesen

(2017) The legal transformation from prisoner to ex-prisoner in the Danish welfare State. In: Smith

and Ugelvik

(eds) Embraced by the Welfare State? Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

31.

Phelps

(2017) Mass probation: Toward a more robust theory of state variation in punishment. Punishment & Society 19(1): 53–73.

32.

Pogrebin

and Dodge

(2001) Women’s accounts of their prison experiences: A retrospective view of their subjective realities. Journal of Criminal Justice 29(6): 531–541.

33.

Pratt

(2008a) Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an era of penal excess; Part I: The nature and roots of Scandinavian Exceptionalism. British Journal of Criminology 48: 119–137.

34.

Pratt

(2008b) Scandinavian Exceptionalism in an era of penal excess; Part II: Does Scandinavian Exceptionalism have a future? British Journal of Criminology 48: 275–292.

35.

Pratt

and Eriksson

(2013) Contrasts in Punishment: An Explanation of Anglophone Excess and Nordic Exceptionalism. New York, NY: Routledge.

36.

Reiter

(2014) The Pelican Bay hunger strike: Resistance within the structural constraints of a U.S. Supermax prison. South Atlantic Quarterly 113(3): 579–611.

37.

Reiter

Sexton

and Sumner

(2016) Denmark doesn’t treat its prisoners like prisoners—and it’s good for everyone. Washington Post, February 2. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2016/02/02/denmark-doesnt-treat-its-prisoners-like-prisoners-and-its-good-for-everyone/?utm_term=.60308c937b5f (accessed 6 October 2017).

38.

Reiter

Sexton

and Sumner

(2017) Negotiating imperfect humanity in the Danish Penal System. In: Smith

and Ugelvik

(eds) Embraced by the Welfare State? Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

39.

Shammas

(2014) The pains of freedom: Assessing the ambiguity of Scandinavian penal exceptionalism on Norway’s Prison Island. Punishment & Society 16(1): 104–123.

40.

Simon

(2014) Mass Incarceration on Trial. New York, NY: The New Press.

41.

Sexton

(2015) Penal subjectivities: Developing a theoretical framework for penal consciousness. Punishment & Society 17(1): 114–136.

42.

Slater

(2017) North Dakota’s Norway Experiment. Mother Jones, Jul/August. Available at: http://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2017/07/north-dakota-norway-prisons-experiment/ (accessed 6 October 2017).

43.

Smith

(2006) The effects of solitary confinement on prison inmates: A brief history and review of the literature. In: Tonry M (ed). Crime and Justice 34: 441–528.

44.

Smith

(2012) A critical look at Scandinavian Exceptionalism: Welfare state theories, penal populism, and prison conditions in Denmark and Scandinavia. In: Ugelvik

and Dullum

(eds) Penal Exceptionalism? Nordic Prison Policy and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 38–57.

45.

Smith

and Ugelvik T (eds) (2017) Embraced by the Welfare State? Scandinavian Penal History, Culture and Prison Practice. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.

46.

Sparks

(2001) Degrees of estrangement: The cultural theory of risk and comparative penology. Theoretical Criminology 5(2): 159–176.

47.

Sparks

and Bottoms

(1995) Legitimacy and order in prisons. The British Journal of Sociology 46(1): 45–62.

48.

Sparks

Hey

and Bottoms

(1996) Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

49.

Strauss

(1978) Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

50.

Sykes

(1958/2007) The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

51.

Thomas

(1984) Some aspects of negotiated order, loose coupling and mesostructure in maximum security prisons. Symbolic Interaction 7(2): 213–231.

52.

Ugelvik

and Dullum J (2012) Penal Exceptionalism? Nordic Prison Policy and Practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

53.

Valverde

(2012) Analyzing punishment: Scope and scale. Theoretical Criminology 16(2): 245–253.

54.

Whitman

(2007) What happened to Toqueville’s America? Social Research 74(2): 251–268.

Theoretical and empirical limits of Scandinavian Exceptionalism: Isolation and normalization in Danish prisons

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References