New York State is one of only two states in the nation that processes all 16- and 17-year-old defendants as adults. Contrary to this seemingly punitive stance, the state also maintains a Youthful Offender Statute that requires mitigated punishments for youths up to their 19th birthday upon court designation of youthful offender status. This study empirically examines the individual and combined impact of the social status of being a “minor” and the legally awarded status of being designated a youthful offender, upon adult court sentencing decisions framing the discussion within broader conceptualizations of youthfulness, culpability, and punishment. Utilizing a population of all youths ages 16–21 whose cases were disposed in New York between 2000 and 2006, this study finds the legally defined status of youthful offender to provide much greater mitigation at sentencing than the more general social status of being a minor. Findings are discussed as they relate to categorical and individualized assessments of culpability. In addition, as the study finds individualized assessments of culpability to be related to factors such as gender and race, broader implications for the role of court assigned statuses and mitigation of punishment are offered.
AlbonettiCA (1997) Sentencing under federal sentencing guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentencing outcomes for drug offenses 1991–1992. Law and Society Review31(4): 789–822.
2.
AronsonJD (2007) Brain imaging, culpability and the juvenile death penalty. Psychology, Public Policy and Law13: 115.
3.
BarrettC (2013) Courting Kids: Inside an Experimental Youth Court, New York: NYU Press.
4.
Bernard TJ and Kurlychek MC (2010) The Cycle of Juvenile Justice. New York: Oxford Academic Press.
5.
BortnerMA (1986) Traditional rhetoric, organizational realities: Remand of juveniles to adult court. Crime and Delinquency32(1): 53–73.
6.
BridgesGSSteenS (1998) Racial disparities in official assessments of juvenile offenders: Attributional stereotypes as mediating mechanisms. American Sociological Review63: 554–570.
7.
Casey BJ, Giedd JN and Thomas KM (2000) Structural and functional brain development and its relation to cognitive development. Biological Psychology 54(1): 241–257.
8.
ChampionDJ (1989) Teenage felons and waiver hearings: Some recent trends, 1980–1988. Crime and Delinquency35(4): 577–585.
9.
ChandlerMA (1982) New York State’s Youthful Offender Statutes: An Empirical Investigation of Their Theoretical Basis and Their Operation, Albany: State University of New York at Albany.
10.
Chesney-LindMSheldenRG (1992) Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
11.
ClementMJ (1997) A five-year study of juvenile waiver and adult sentences: Implications for policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review8(2–3): 201–219.
12.
DahlRE (2001) Affect regulation, brain development and behavioral/emotional health in adolescence. CNS Spectrums6: 60.
13.
DemuthS (2003) Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, black, and white felony arrestees. Criminology41: 873–908.
14.
DemuthSSteffensmeierD (2004) Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large Urban Courts: Comparisons among white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Social Science Quarterly85: 994–1011.
15.
EigenJ (1981) Punishing youth homicide offenders in Philadelphia. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology72: 1072–1093.
16.
Fader J, Kurlychek MC and Johnson K (2014). The color of juvenile justice: Racial disparities in dispositional decisions. Social Science Review 44: 126–140.
17.
FeldB (1999) Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court, New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
FeldB (2013) The youth discount. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law11: 107–148.
19.
GrahamSLoweryBS (2004) Priming unconscious racial stereotypes about adolescent offenders. Law Human Behavior28: 483–504.
20.
GrissoT (1996) Society’s retributive response to juvenile violence: A developmental perspective. Law and Human Behavior20: 229.
21.
HamparianDMEstepLEMunteanSet al. (1982) Major Issues in Juvenile Justice Information and Training: Youth in Adult Courts – Between Two Worlds, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
22.
JohnsonBD (2003) Racial and ethnic disparities in sentencing departures across modes of conviction. Criminology41: 449–90.
23.
Klein EK (1997). Dennis the Menace or Billy the Kid: An analysis of the role of transfer to criminal court in juvenile justice. American Criminal Law Review 35: 371.
24.
KupchikA (2006) Judging Juveniles: Prosecuting Adolescents in Adult and Juvenile Courts, New York: New York University Press.
25.
KurlychekMC (2010) Pathways to adult court: Does the road traveled impact the final destination?Justice Research and Policy12(2): 1–22.
26.
KurlychekMCJohnsonBD (2004) The juvenile penalty: A comparison of juvenile and young adult sentencing outcomes in adult criminal court. Criminology42(2): 485–517.
27.
Kurlychek MC and Johnson BD (2010) Juvenility and punishment: Sentencing juveniles in adult criminal courts. Criminology 48(3): 725–758.
28.
Leiber MJ (2002) Disproportionate Minority Confinement (DMC) of Youth: An analysis of state and federal efforts to address the issue. Crime and Delinquency 48: 3–45.
29.
LenrootRKGieddJN (2006) Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review30: 718.
30.
MorseSJ (1997) Immaturity and irresponsibility. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology88(1): 15–67.
31.
MyersDL (2001) Excluding Violent Youths from Juvenile Court: The Effectiveness of Juvenile Waiver, New York: LFB Scholarly Press.
32.
Peterson RD (1988) Youthful offender designations and sentencing in the New York criminal courts. Social Problems 35(2): 111–130.
33.
Pierce KB (1869) A Half Century with Juvenile Delinquents. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith.
34.
Platt A (1969) The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency. London: The University of Chicago Press.
35.
Poe-YamagataEJonesMA (2000) And Justice for Some, Washington, DC: Youth Law Center.
36.
PopeCEFeyerhermW (1995) Minorities and the Juvenile Justice System, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
37.
PopeCELovellRHsiaHM (2002) Disproportionate minority confinement: A review of the research literature from 1989 through 2001. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, NCJ 198428, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
38.
Sickmund M and Puzzenchera C (2014) Juvenile Offenders and Victims: A National Report. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice.
39.
Singer SI, Fagan J and Liberman A (2000) The reproduction of juvenile justice in criminal court: A case study of New York’s Juvenile Offender Law. In: Fagan J and Zimring FE (eds) The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 353–379.
40.
SpohnC (2000) Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice3: 427–501.
41.
SteffensmeierDUlmerJKramerJ (1998) The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology36(4): 763–798.
42.
SteinbergL (2008) Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology44: 1764.
43.
Steinberg L and Cauffman J (1999) Forward: The elephant in the courtroom: A developmental perspective on the adjudication of youthful offenders. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law 6: 389–653.
44.
Tobin J (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 24–36.
45.
UlmerJTJohnsonB (2004) Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology42(1): 137–178.
46.
ZatzM (2000) The convergence of race, ethnicity, gender, and class on court decision making: Looking toward the 21st century. Criminal Justice: The National Institute of Justice Journal3: 503–52.
47.
ZimringFE (1998) Toward a jurisprudence of youth violence. Crime and Justice24: 477.
