Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bird
M
Grattet
R
(2014 ) Do Local Realignment Policies Affect Recidivism in California? , Sacramento, CA : Public Policy Institute of California .
2.
Guetzkow
J
Schoon
E
(2015 ) If you build it, they will fill it: The consequences of prison overcrowding litigation . Law & Society Review 49 : 401 –432 .
3.
Lynch
M
(2010 ) Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment , Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press .
4.
Lofstrom
M
Raphael
S
(2013 ) Impact of Realignment on County Jail Populations , Sacramento, CA : Public Policy Institute of California .
5.Petersilia J (2012) Looking back to see the future of prison downsizing in America. National Institute of Justice Conference. Available at: http://nij.ncjrs.gov/multimedia/video-nijconf2012-laub-petersilia.htm#petersilia1 (accessed 17 December 2015) .
6.
Pifer
NA
(2016 ) Re-entrenchment through reform: The promises and perils of categorical exemptions for extreme punishment policy . Alabama Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Law Review 7(2) .
7.
Reiter
K
(2012 ) Parole, snitch, or die: California’s supermax prisons and prisoners, 1997–2007 . Punishment & Society 14 (5 ): 530 –563 .
8.
Reiter
K
(2016 ) Prisons within Prisons: The Hidden Hell of the American Supermax , New Haven, CT : Yale University Press .
9.
Reiter
K
Pifer
N
(2015 ) Plata v. Brown . In:
Tonry
M
(ed.) Oxford Handbooks Online in Criminology and Criminal Justice , New York : Oxford University Press Available at: www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935383.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935383-e-113 .
10.
Schoenfeld
H
(2010 ) Mass incarceration and the paradox of prison conditions litigation . Law & Society Review 44 (3–4 ): 731 –768 .
11.
Verma
A
(2015 ) The law-before: Legacies and gaps in penal reform . Law & Society Review 49 (4 ): 847 –882 .
12.
Zimring
FE
Hawkins
G
(1991 ) The Scale of Imprisonment , Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press .
