This article examines the effect of economic individualism – a belief that individuals can and should be responsible for their own economic welfare – on punitive attitudes in the English-speaking western world. Using existing survey data from the USA, Canada, Australia, the UK and New Zealand, the relationship between both normative and descriptive economic individualism and support for stiffer sentences and the death penalty is empirically assessed. Relatively consistently, a positive and significant relationship exists between both measures of economic individualism and both measures of punitiveness. This article suggests possible causal and non-causal reasons for this finding, as well as implications for future research.
AlesinaAAngeletosG-M (2005) Fairness and redistribution. The American Economic Review95(4): 960–980.
2.
ApplegateBSanbornJ (2011) Public opinion on the harshness of local courts: An experimental test of question wording effects. Criminal Justice Review36(4): 487–497.
3.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Prisoners in Australia, 2013, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
4.
BellahRMadsenRSullivanW (1996) Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life, California: University of California Press.
5.
CarachCGrantA (1999) Imprisonment in Australia: Trends in Prison Populations & Imprisonment Rates 1982–1998. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
6.
CarsonAMulako-WangotaJ (2013) Correctional Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT) – Prisoners. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available at: http://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=nps (accessed 18 January 2014.
7.
CostelloeMChiricosTGertzM (2009) Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Exploring the relevance of crime salience and economic insecurity. Punishment & Society11(1): 25–49.
8.
CrowsonHM (2009) Are all conservatives alike? A study of the psychological correlates of cultural and economic conservatism. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied143(5): 449–463.
9.
CullenFFisherBApplegateB (2000) Public opinion about punishment and corrections. Crime and Justice27: 1–79.
10.
DeFinaRHannonL (2010) For incapacitation, there is no time like the present: The lagged effects of prisoner reentry on property and violent crime rates. Social Science Research39(6): 1004–1014.
11.
Di TellaRDubraJ (2008) Crime and punishment in the ‘American dream’. Journal of Public Economics92(7): 1564–1584.
12.
13.
Di TellaRDubraJ (2011b) Free to Punish? The American Dream and the Harsh Treatment of Criminals. Cato Papers on Public Policy, Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
14.
DoobA (2012) Principled sentencing, politics, and restraint in the use of imprisonment: Canada’s break with its history. Champ pénal/Penal field. Nouvelle revue internationale de criminologie9. Available at: http://ww.champpenal.revues.org/8335 (accessed 29 November 2014.
15.
DurkheimE (1933) The Division of Labour in Society, Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
16.
DurlaufSNaginD (2011) Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced?Criminology & Public Policy10(1): 13–54.
17.
EinstadterWJHenryS (2006) Criminological Theory: An Analysis of Its Underlying Assumptions, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
18.
EmersonR (1850) Essays, Boston, MA: James Munroe and Company.
19.
FedericoC (2006) Race, education and individualism revisited. Journal of Politics68(3): 600–610.
20.
FeldmanS (1983) Economic individualism and American public opinion. American Politics Quarterly11(1): 3–29.
21.
FeldmanSJohnsonC (2013) Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology. Epub ahead of print 12 June 2013. DOI: 10.1111/pops.1205.
22.
23.
FunkCSmithKAlfordJ (2013) Genetic and environmental transmission of political orientations. Political Psychology34(6): 805–819.
24.
GansH (1995) The War Against the Poor, New York: Basic Books.
25.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
GilensM (1995) Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare. Journal of Politics57(4): 994–1014.
27.
GilensM (1996) ‘Race coding’ and white opposition to welfare. American Political Science Review90(3): 593–604.
Haen-MarshallI (2001) The criminological enterprise in Europe and the United States: A contextual exploration. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research9(3): 235–257.
30.
HasenfeldYRaffertyJ (1989) The determinants of public attitudes towards the welfare state. Social Forces67(4): 1027–1048.
IndermaurDHoughM (2002) Strategies for changing public attitudes to punishment. In: RobertsJHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice, Cullompton: Willan, pp. 184–214.
33.
JohnsonE (1997) Criminalization and Prisoners in Japan: Six Contrary Cohorts, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
34.
JonesCWeatherburnDMcFarlaneK (2008) Public Confidence in the New South Wales Criminal Justice System. Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, Sydney: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
35.
KaplanP (2006) American exceptionalism and racialized inequality in American capital punishment. Law & Social Inquiry31(1): 149–175.
36.
KinderDSandersL (1996) Divided by Color, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
37.
KingA (2008) Keeping a safe distance: Individualism and the less punitive public. British Journal of Criminology48(2): 190–208.
38.
KohnM (1987) Cross-national research as an analytic strategy: American Sociological Association, 1987 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review52(6): 713–731.
39.
KornhauserR (2013) Reconsidering predictors of punitiveness in Australia: A test of four theories. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology46(2): 221–240.
40.
LakoffG (2002) Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
41.
Lappi-SeppäläT (2011) Explaining imprisonment in Europe. European Journal of Criminology8(4): 303–328.
42.
LipsetS (1988) American exceptionalism reaffirmed. International Review of Sociology Series 12(3): 25–69.
43.
McEntireR (2007) Race, Ethnicity, Threat, and Punitive Attitudes towards Criminals, PhD thesis, Florida State University, USA.
44.
MasciniPHoutmanD (2006) Rehabilitation and repression: Reassessing their ideological embeddedness. British Journal of Criminology46(5): 822–836.
45.
MauerM (2001) The causes and consequences of prison growth in the United States. In: GarlandD (ed) Mass Imprisonment: Social Causes and Consequences, London: SAGE, pp. 4–14.
46.
NaginDCullenFJonsonC (2009) Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime and Justice38(1): 115–200.
OsbergLSmeedingT (2006) ‘Fair’ inequality? Attitudes toward pay differentials: The United States in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review71(3): 450–473.
50.
PiqueroAFarringtonDWelshB (2008) Effects of Early Family/Parent Training Programs on Antisocial Behavior & Delinquency: A Systematic Review, Stockholm: The Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.
51.
RobertsJDoobA (1990) News media influences on public views of sentencing. Law and Human Behavior14(5): 451–468.
52.
RobertsJStalansLIndermaurD (2003) Penal Populism and Public Opinion: Lessons from Five Countries, New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
RothwellVHawdonJ (2008) Science, individualism, and attitudes toward deviance: The influence of modernization and rationalization. Deviant Behavior29(3): 253–274.
54.
RubinA (2011) Punitive penal preferences and support for welfare: Applying the ‘governance of social marginality’ thesis to the individual level. Punishment & Society13(2): 198–229.
55.
RudolphURoeschSGreitemeyerT (2004) A meta-analytic review of help giving and aggression from an attributional perspective: Contributions to a general theory of motivation. Cognition and Emotion18(6): 815–848.
56.
ScheingoldS (1984) The Politics of Law and Order: Street Crime and Public Policy, New York: Longman.
57.
SimonJ (2007) Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear, New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
SimsB (2003) The impact of causal attribution on correctional ideology: A national study. Criminal Justice Review28(1): 1–25.
59.
60.
SossJLangbeinLMetelkoA (2003) Why do white Americans support the death penalty?Journal of Politics65(2): 397–421.
SvallforsS (1997) Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review13(3): 283–304.
63.
TonryM (2001) Punishment policies and patterns in western countries. In: TonryMFraseR (eds) Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–28.
64.
TonryM (2004) Thinking about Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture, New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
TonryM (2007) Crime does not cause punishment: The impact of sentencing policy on levels of crime. SA Crime Quarterly20: 13–20.
66.
TylerTBoeckmannR (1997) Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review31(2): 237–266.
UnneverJCullenF (2007) The racial divide in support for the death penalty: Does white racism matter?Social Forces85(3): 1281–1301.
69.
UnneverJCullenF (2010a) Racial-ethnic intolerance and support for capital punishment: A cross-national comparison. Criminology48(3): 831–864.
70.
UnneverJCullenF (2010b) The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology48(1): 99–129.
71.
UnneverJCullenFJonesJ (2008) Public support for attacking the ‘root causes’ of crime: The impact of egalitarian and racial beliefs. Sociological Focus41(1): 1–33.
72.
UnneverJCullenFRobertsJ (2005) Not everyone strongly supports the death penalty: Assessing weakly-held attitudes about capital punishment. American Journal of Criminal Justice29(2): 187–216.
73.
74.
WesternMBaxterJPakulskiJ (2010) Neoliberalism, inequality and politics: Public policy and the transformation of Australian society, 2005. University of Queensland Social Research Centre, Australian Social Science Data Archive.
75.
WhitmanJ (2003) Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe, New York: Oxford University Press.
76.
WhitmanJ (2005) ‘Human dignity’ in Europe and the United States: The social foundations. In: NolteG (ed) European and US Constitutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 108–124.
77.
YoungWBrownM (1993) Cross-national comparisons of imprisonment. Crime and Justice17: 1–45.
78.
ZimringFJohnsonD (2006) Public opinion and the governance of punishment in democratic political systems. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science605(1): 265–280.
79.
ZuckerGSWeinerB (1993) Conservatism and perceptions of poverty: An attributional analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology23(12): 925–943.
