Crime prevention has long figured prominently in the scholarly and applied traditions of criminology. Using a socio-historical approach, this article examines the developments of and influences on the concept of crime prevention in the USA over the last century. We argue that crime prevention is a unique social and environmental strategy for reducing crime and is distinct from crime control or punishment. Prevention’s main characteristics include a focus on intervening in the first instance – before a crime has been committed – and operating outside of the formal justice system. The historical record of the scholarship and practice of crime prevention in the USA embraces this view. A more current perspective sees crime prevention as the full range of techniques, from prenatal home visits to prison sentences, defined more by its outcome – the prevention of a future criminal event – than its character or approach. A return to the original meaning of prevention is considered.
BeirneP (1993) Inventing Criminology: Essays on the Rise of Homo Criminalis, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2.
BennettTH (1998) Crime prevention. In: TonryM (eds) The Handbook of Crime and Punishment, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 369–402.
3.
BlumsteinACohenJNaginDS (1978) Deterrence and Incapacitation, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4.
BragaAAWeisburdD (2010) Policing Problem Places: Crime Hot Spots and Effective Prevention, New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
CatalanoRFHawkinsJD (1996) The Social Development Model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In: HawkinsJD (eds) Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–197.
6.
ClarkeRV (1992) Introduction. In: ClarkeRV (eds) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, Albany, NY: Harrow and Heston, pp. 3–36.
7.
ClarkeRV (1995a) Opportunity-reducing crime prevention strategies and the role of motivation. In: WikströmP-OHClarkeRVMcCordJ (eds) Integrating Crime Prevention Strategies: Propensity and Opportunity, Stockholm, Sweden: National Council for Crime Prevention, pp. 55–67.
8.
ClarkeRV (1995b) Situational crime prevention. In: TonryMFarringtonDP (eds) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–150.
9.
ClarkeRV (2009) Situational crime prevention: Theoretical background and current practice. In: KrohnMDLizotteAJHallGP (eds) Handbook on Crime and Deviance, New York: Springer, pp. 259–276.
10.
ClowardROhlinL (1960) Delinquency and Opportunity, New York: Free Press.
11.
Consortium for Longitudinal Studies (1983) As the Twig Is Bent… Lasting Effects of Preschool Programs, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
CookPJLudwigJMcCraryJ (2011) Controlling Crime: Strategies and Tradeoffs, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
CornishDBClarkeRV (1986) The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, New York: Springer-Verlag.
14.
CornishDBClarkeRV (2003) Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In: SmithMJCornishDB (eds) Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention, Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 41–96.
15.
CurrieE (1994) What’s wrong with the crime bill. The Nation258(4): 118–121.
16.
CurtisLA (1985) Neighborhood, family, and employment: Toward a new public policy against violence. In: CurtisLA (eds) American Violence and Public Policy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 205–224.
17.
CurtisLA (1987) Preface: Policies to prevent crime: Neighborhood, family, and employment strategies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science494: 9–18.
18.
DishionTJMcCordJPoulinF (1999) When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist54: 755–764.
19.
DodgeKA (2001) The science of youth violence prevention: Progressing from developmental epidemiology to efficacy to effectiveness to public policy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine20(1S): 63–70.
20.
DonohueJJSiegelmanP (1998) Allocating resources among prisons and social programs in the battle against crime. Journal of Legal Studies27: 1–43.
21.
EckenrodeJCampaMLuckeyDW (2010) Long-term effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course of youths: 19-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine164: 9–15.
22.
FarringtonDP (1996) The explanation and prevention of youthful offending. In: HawkinsJD (eds) Delinquency and Crime: Current Theories, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 68–148.
23.
FarringtonDPWelshBC (2007) Saving Children from a Life of Crime: Early Risk Factors and Effective Interventions, New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
FriebergA (2001) Affective versus effective justice: Instrumentalism and emotionalism in criminal justice. Punishment and Society3: 265–278.
25.
GarlandD (1990) Punishment and Modern Society, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
GarlandD (1996) The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology36: 445–471.
27.
GestT (2001) Crime and Politics: Big Government’s Erratic Campaign for Law and Order, New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
GoldsteinH (1979) Improving policing: A problem-oriented approach. Crime and Delinquency25: 236–258.
29.
GoldsteinH (1990) Problem-Oriented Policing, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
30.
GreenwoodPW (2006) Changing Lives: Delinquency Prevention as Crime-Control Policy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
HawkinsJDKostermanRCatalanoRFHillKGAbbottRD (2008) Effects of social development intervention in childhood 15 years later. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine162: 1133–1141.
33.
HopeT (1995) Community crime prevention. In: TonryMFarringtonDP (eds) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 21–89.
34.
JacobsJ (1961) The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random House.
35.
JeffreyCR (1971) Crime Prevention through Environmental Design, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
36.
LallyJRMangionePLHonigAS (1988) The Syracuse University Family Development Research Program: Long-range impact of an early intervention with low-income children and their families. In: PowellDR (eds) Parent Education as Early Childhood Intervention, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 79–104.
37.
LaubJH (1983) Criminology in the Making: An Oral History, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
38.
LaubJH (2004) The life course of criminology in the United States: The American Society of Criminology 2003 presidential address. Criminology42: 1–26.
39.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (1991) The Sutherland-Glueck debate: On the sociology of criminological knowledge. American Journal of Sociology96: 1402–1440.
40.
LavrakasPJ (1985) Citizen self-help and neighborhood crime prevention policy. In: CurtisLA (eds) American Violence and Public Policy, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, pp. 87–115.
41.
LaycockGClarkeRV (2001) Crime prevention policy and government research: A comparison of the United States and the United Kingdom. International Journal of Comparative Sociology42: 235–255.
42.
LejinsPP (1967) The field of prevention. In: AmosWEWellfordCF (eds) Delinquency Prevention: Theory and Practice, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 1–21.
43.
LissJSchlossmanSL (1984) The contours of crime prevention in August Vollmer’s Berkeley. Research in Law, Deviance and Social Control6: 79–107.
44.
LundmanRJ (2001) Prevention and Control of Juvenile Delinquency, New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
McCordJ (1978) A thirty-year follow-up report on the Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study. American Psychologist33: 284–289.
46.
MartinsonR (1974) What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest35: 22–54.
47.
McCordJ (2003) Cures that harm: Unanticipated outcomes of crime prevention programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science587: 16–30.
48.
McCordJMcCordW (1959) A follow-up report on the Cambridge-Somerville Youth Study. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science322: 89–96.
49.
MearsDP (2010) American Criminal Justice Policy: An Evaluation Approach to Increasing Accountability and Effectiveness, New York: Cambridge University Press.
50.
MendelRA (1995) Prevention or Pork?, Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
51.
MooreMH (1992) Problem-solving and community policing. In: TonryMMorrisN (eds) Modern Policing, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 99–158.
52.
MorrisN (1968) Random reflections on ‘The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society’. Law and Society Review2: 277–283.
53.
National Advisory Commission on Criminal Justice Standards and Goals (1973) Report on Community Crime Prevention, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
54.
National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence (1969) To Establish Justice, to Insure Domestic Tranquility, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
NewmanO (1972) Defensible Space: Crime Prevention through Urban Design, New York: Macmillan.
57.
PawsonR (2006) Evidence-Based Policy: A Realistic Perspective, London: SAGE.
58.
PowersEWitmerH (1951) An Experiment in the Prevention of Delinquency, New York: Columbia University Press.
59.
President’s Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice (1967) The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
60.
RafterN (2004) Earnest A. Hooton and the biological tradition in American criminology. Criminology42: 735–771.
61.
RafterN (2010) Silence and memory in criminology: The American Society of Criminology 2009 Sutherland address. Criminology48: 339–356.
62.
ReissAJRothJA (1993) Understanding and Preventing Violence, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63.
RockP (2004) Victims, prosecutors and the state in nineteenth century England and Wales. Criminal Justice4: 331–354.
64.
RosenbaumDP (1986) Community Crime Prevention: Does it Work?, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
65.
RosenbaumDP (1988) Community crime prevention: A review and synthesis of the literature. Justice Quarterly5: 323–395.
66.
SavelsbergJJFloodSM (2004) Criminological knowledge: Period and cohort effects in scholarship. Criminology42: 1009–1041.
67.
SchlossmanMB (2012) Less interest, less treatment: Mexican-American youth and the Los Angeles juvenile court in the Great Depression era. Punishment and Society14: 193–216.
68.
SchlossmanSLSedlakM (1983) The Chicago Area Project revisited. Crime and Delinquency26: 398–462.
69.
SchweinhartLJWeikartDP (1980) Young Children Grow Up, Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
SeitzVRosenbaumLKApfelNH (1985) Effects of family support intervention: A ten-year follow-up. Child Development56: 376–391.
72.
ShawCRMcKayHD (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
73.
ShermanLW (2005) The use and usefulness of criminology, 1751–2005: Enlightened justice and its failures. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science600: 115–135.
74.
ShermanLWFarringtonDPWelshBCMacKenzieDL (2006) Evidence-Based Crime Prevention, New York: Routledge.
75.
ShermanLWGottfredsonDCMacKenzieDLEckJEReuterPBushwaySD (1997) Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.
76.
ShortJF (1974) The natural history of an applied theory: Differential opportunity and ‘Mobilization for Youth.’. In: DemerathNJLarsenOSchuesslerKF (eds) Social Policy and Sociology, New York: Seminar Press.
77.
TonryM (2004) Thinking about Crime: Sense and Sensibility in American Penal Culture, New York: Oxford University Press.
78.
TonryMFarringtonDP (1995) Strategic approaches to crime prevention. In: TonryMFarringtonDP (eds) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–20.
79.
TremblayRECraigWM (1995) Developmental crime prevention. In: TonryMFarringtonDP (eds) Building a Safer Society: Strategic Approaches to Crime Prevention, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 151–236.
80.
VilaBJ (1997) Human nature and crime control: Improving the feasibility of nurturant strategies. Politics and the Life Sciences16: 3–21.
81.
VisherCAWeisburdD (1998) Identifying what works: Recent trends in crime prevention strategies. Crime, Law and Social Change28: 223–242.
82.
von HirschAGarlandDWakefieldA (2000) Ethical and Social Perspectives on Situational Crime Prevention, Oxford, UK: Hart.
83.
WalkerS (1978) Reexamining the President’s Crime Commission: The challenge of crime in a free society after ten years. Crime and Delinquency24: 1–12.
84.
WallerI (1990) With national leadership Canada could turn the tide on crime. Canadian Journal of Criminology32: 185–190.
85.
WallerI (2006) Less Law, More Order: The Truth about Reducing Crime, Westport, CT: Praeger.
86.
WeisJGHawkinsJD (1981) Preventing Delinquency, Washington, DC: National Institute for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, US Department of Justice.
87.
WeissCHMurphy-GrahamEPetrosinoAGandhiAG (2008) The fairy godmother – and her warts: Making the dream of evidence-based policy come true. American Journal of Evaluation29: 29–47.
88.
WelshBCFarringtonDP (2009) Making Public Places Safer: Surveillance and Crime Prevention, New York: Oxford University Press.
89.
WelshBCSullivanCJOldsDL (2010) When early crime prevention goes to scale: A new look at the evidence. Prevention Science11: 115–125.
90.
WrightJPMcMahonPMDalyCHaneyJP (2012) Getting the law involved: A quasi-experiment in early intervention involving collaboration between schools and the district attorney’s office. Criminology and Public Policy11: 227–249.
