The right of initiative offers the opportunity to Swiss citizens to have a direct and prominent influence on penal policy. This research tries to evaluate the effect of social instability on social reaction to deviance using the results of the 2004 Swiss vote on the lifelong detention initiative. I determine that extreme right-wing political orientation (p < 0.001) and xenophobic attitudes such as national preference (p < 0.05) and preference for a closed country (p < 0.05) explain the support for this measure at the individual level. These results can be interpreted according to the Durkheimian view of punishment, which considers this process as an emotional response in order to defend established norms and values. At the macro-social level, social instability (p < 0.05) reinforces the positive relationship between xenophobic attitudes (p < 0.001) and support for lifelong detention. This result supports Young's theory concerning the effect of social instability on social reaction to deviance. Social instability would create a situation in which norms and values are contested. The need to reinforce these norms and values would be fostered by these circumstances.
AgrestiAAgrestiBF (1978) Statistical analysis of qualitative variation. Sociological Methodology9: 204–237.
2.
ApplegateBKCullenFTFisherBS (2002) Public views toward crime and correctional policies: Is there a gender gap?. Journal of Criminal Justice30(2): 89–100.
3.
BakerERobertsJV (2005) Globalization and the new punitiveness. In: PrattJBrownDBrownMHallsworthSMorrisonW (eds) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 121–138.
4.
BarkanSECohnSF (1994) Racial prejudice and support for the death penalty by whites. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency31(2): 202–209.
5.
BorgMJ (1997) The southern subculture of punitiveness? Regional variation in support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency34(1): 25–45.
6.
CohnSFBarkanSEHaltemanWA (1991) Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Racial consensus or racial conflict?. Social Problems38(2): 287–296.
7.
CostelloeMTChiricosTBurianekJGertzMMaier-KatkinD (2002) The social correlates of punitiveness toward criminals: A comparison of the Czech Republic and Florida. Justice System Journal23(2): 190–220.
8.
CostelloeMTChiricosTGertzM (2009) Punitive attitudes toward criminals: Exploring the relevance of crime salience and economic insecurity. Punishment & Society11(1): 25–49.
9.
CookKJPowellC (2003) Christianity and punitive mentalities: A qualitative study. Crime, Law, & Social Change39(1): 69–89.
10.
CookTDCampbellDT (1979) Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis for Field Settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
11.
CronbachLJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika16(3): 297–334.
12.
DurkheimE (1893) De la division du travail social: Etude sur l’organisation des sociétiés supérieures. Paris: Alcan.
13.
EndersCKTofighiD (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods12(2): 121–138.
14.
EriksonK (1966) Wayward Puritans. New York: Wiley.
15.
EvansDTAdamsM (2003) ‘Salvation or damnation? Religion and correctional ideology. American Journal of Criminal Justice28(1): 15–35.
16.
GarlandD (1991) Sociological perspectives on punishment. Crime and Justice14: 115–165.
17.
GelmanAHillJ (2007) Data Analysis using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
JohnsonD (2008) Racial prejudice, perceived injustice, and the black–white gap in punitive attitudes. Journal of Criminal Justice36(2): 198–206.
20.
JohnsonD (2009) Anger about crime and support for punitive criminal justice policies. Punishment & Society11(1): 51–66.
21.
KilliasM (1989) Les Suisses face au crime. Grütsch Ruegger.
22.
KingAMarunaS (2009a) Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views. Punishment & Society11(2): 147–169.
23.
KingAMarunaS (2009b) Once a criminal, always a criminal? ‘Redeemability’ and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy & Research15(1–2): 7–24.
24.
KosterFGoudriaanHVan Der SchansC (2009) Shame and punishment: An international comparative study on the effects of religious affiliation and religiosity on attitudes to offending. European Journal of Criminology6(6): 481–495.
25.
KuhnA (2002) Public and judicial attitudes to punishment in Switzerland. In: RobertsJHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 115–127.
26.
KuryHBrandensteinMObergfell-FuchsJ (2009) Dimensions of punitiveness in Germany. European Journal on Criminal Policy & Research15(1–2): 63–81.
27.
LongfordNT (2008) Missing data. In: De LeeuwJMeijerE (eds) Handbook of Multilevel Analysis. New York: Springer, 377–399.
28.
Louis-GuérinC (1984) Les réactions sociales au crime: Peur et punitivité. Revue française de sociologie25(4): 623–635.
29.
LukeDA (2004) Multilevel Modeling: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
30.
MayhewPVan KesterenJ (2002) Cross-national attitudes to punishment. In: RobertsJHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 63–92.
31.
MuthénBOSatorraA (1995) Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology25: 267–316.
32.
NewburnTJonesT (2005) Symbolic politics and penal populism: The long shadow of Willie Horton. Crime, Media, Culture1(1): 72–87.
33.
PayneBKGaineyRRTriplettRADannerMJE (2004) What drives punitive beliefs? Demographic characteristics and justifications for sentencing. Journal of Criminal Justice32(3): 195–206.
34.
PrattJClarkM (2005) Penal populism in New Zealand. Punishment & Society7(3): 303–322.
35.
R Development Core Team (2010) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
RobertPPottierM-L (1997) ‘On ne se sent plus en sécurité’: Délinquance et Insécurité. Une enquête sur Deux Décennies. Revue française de science politique47(6): 707–740.
38.
SchaferJLGrahamJW (2002) Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods7(2): 147–177.
39.
SnackenS (2010) Resisting punitiveness in Europe?. Theoretical Criminology14(3): 273–293.
40.
SnijdersTABBoskerR (1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London: SAGE.
41.
SolomonSGreenbergJPyszczynskiT (2000) Pride and prejudice: Fear of death and social behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science9(6): 200–204.
TylerTRBoeckmannRJ (1997) Three strikes and you are out, but why? The psychology of public support for punishing rule breakers. Law & Society Review31(2): 237–265.
47.
TylerTRWeberR (1982) Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime, or symbolic attitude?. Law & Society Review17(1): 21–46.
48.
UnneverJDCullenFTFischerBS (2007) ‘A liberal is someone who has not been mugged’: Criminal victimization and political beliefs. Justice Quarterly24(2): 309–334.
49.
Van Buuren S and Groothuis-Oudshoorn K (forthcoming) MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software.
50.
Van KesterenJ (2010) Public attitudes and sentencing policies across the world. European Journal on Journal on Criminal Policy and Research15(1–2): 24–46.
51.
Van MarleFMarunaS (2010) ‘Ontological insecurity’ and ‘terror management’: Linking two free-floating anxieties. Punishment & Society12(1): 7–26.
