Although capital punishment in the United States is subject to much social scientific scrutiny, there has been little ethnographic study of death penalty trials. This is not only an empirical lacuna, but also a theoretically and politically important one: by failing to take capital trials as primary objects of inquiry, the practices of lawyers, witnesses, judges, and others are viewed as products of, rather than implicated in, the institution of criminal justice. Based on an ethnography of fifteen death penalty sentencing trials across the United States during 2007, 2008, and 2009, this article seeks to understand the role of juries in capital trials. While judges customarily make sentencing decisions in American criminal cases, capital cases require jury sentencing. Key to understanding this unusual requirement is the recruitment of potential jurors into a role I term punitive citizenship. Through the process of choosing ‘death qualified’ jurors for trial, capital jurors are asked to call upon their own moral positions in conjunction with their responsibility to the collective to decide on appropriate punishments for defendants who are singled out for capital prosecution by the state. This ensures that capital jurors take personal responsibility for the punishment decision. The article argues that this process blurs the lines between state and citizen action, solidifies the types of homicides that are designated worthy of capital punishment, and allows the state to neutralize some of the historic problems with state-sponsored death sentences.
Aijmer G. and Abbink J. ( 2000) Meanings of Violence: A Cross-Cultural Perspective . New York: Berg.
2.
Allen H. and Clubb J. ( 2008) Race, Class, and the Death Penalty: Capital Punishment in American History. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
3.
Antonio ME ( 2006) ‘I didn’t know it’d be so hard’: Jurors’ emotional reactions to serving on a capital trial. Judicature89(5): 282-288.
4.
Arendt H. ( 1963) Eichmann in Jerusalem. New York : Penguin Press.
5.
Baldus D. and Woodworth G. ( 2003) Race discrimination and the death penalty: An empirical and legal overview. In: Acker JR, Lanier CS and Bohm RM (eds) America’s Experiment with Capital Punishment: Reflections on the Past, Present and Future of the Ultimate Penal Sanction . Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 501-551.
6.
Baldus D., Woodworth G., Zuckerman D., Weiner NA and Broffitt B. ( 1998) Racial discrimination and the death penalty in the post-Furman era: An empirical and legal overview, with recent findings from Philadelphia . Cornell Law Review83(6): 1638-1770.
7.
Baldus D., Woodworth G., Zuckerman D., Weiner NA and Gross CM ( 2009) Empirical studies of race and geographic discrimination in the administration of the death penalty: A primer on the key methodological issues. In: Lanier CS, Bowers WJ and Acker JR (eds) The Future of America’s Death Penalty: An Agenda for the Next Generation of Capital Punishment Research. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 153-198.
8.
Banner S. ( 2003) The Death Penalty: An American History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
9.
Bienen L. ( 1993) Helping jurors out: Post-verdict debriefing for jurors in emotionally disturbing trials. Indiana Law Journal68(4): 1333-1358.
10.
Bowers WJ and Foglia W. ( 2003) Still singularly agonizing: Law’s failure to purge arbitariness from capital sentencing. Criminal Law Bulletin39(1): 51-86.
11.
Bowers WJ and Sunby SE(2009) Why the downturn in death sentences? In: Lanier CS, Bowers WJ and Acker JR (eds) The Future of America’s Death Penalty: An Agenda for the Next Generation of Capital Punishment Research . Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 47-68.
12.
Bowers WJ, Brewer TW and Lanier CS (2009) The capital jury experiment of the Supreme Court. In: Lanier CS, Bowers WJ and Acker JR (eds) The Future of America’s Death Penalty: An Agenda for the Next Generation of Capital Punishment Research. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 199-224.
13.
Bowers WJ, Fleury-Steiner B. and Antonio M. ( 2003) The capital sentencing decision: Guided discretion, reasoned moral judgment, or legal fiction. In: Acker JR, Lanier CS and Bohm RM (eds) America’s Experiment with Capital Punishment: Reflections on the Past, Present and Future of the Ultimate Penal Sanction. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 413-468.
14.
Bright S. ( 1994) Counsel for the poor: The death sentence not for the worst crime but for the worst lawyer. Yale Law Journal103(7): 1835-1883.
15.
Bright S. ( 1995) Discrimination, death and denial: The tolerance of racial discrimination in the infliction of the death penalty. Santa Clara Law Review35(2): 433-483.
16.
Brundage WF ( 1993) Lynching in the New South. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
17.
Eisenberg T. ( 2004) Death sentence rates and county demographics: An empirical study. Cornell Law Review90(2): 347-370.
18.
Ellsworth P. and Gross S. ( 1994) Hardening of the attitudes: Americans’ views on the death penalty. Journal of Social Issues50(2): 19-52.
19.
Evens TMS and Handelman D. ( 2006) Introduction. The Manchester School: Practice and Ethnographic Praxis in Anthropology. New York: Berghahn Books, 1-11.
20.
Fagan J. and West V.(2009) Death and deterrence redux: Science, law and causal reasoning on capital punishment. In: Lanier CS, Bowers WJ and Acker JR (eds) The Future of America’s Death Penalty: An Agenda for the Next Generation of Capital Punishment Research. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 311-358.
21.
Fleury-Steiner B. ( 2004) Jurors’ Stories of Death: How America’s Death Penalty Invests in Inequality. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
22.
Foucault M. ( 1975) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison . New York: Random House.
23.
Fox JA and Zawitz MW ( 2009) Homicide Trends in the United States. United States Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics report. Available at: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/htius.pdf .
24.
Garland D. ( 1990) Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Garland D. ( 2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Garland D. ( 2005) Capital punishment andAmerican culture. Punishment & Society7(4): 347-376.
27.
Garland D.(2009) ‘Symbolic’ and ‘instrumental’ aspects of capital punishment. In: Lanier CS, Bowers WJ and Acker JR (eds) The Future of America’s Death Penalty: An Agenda for the Next Generation of Capital Punishment Research. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 421-452.
28.
Greenberg D. and West V. ( 2008) Siting the death penalty internationally. Law & Social Inquiry33(2): 295-343.
29.
Hood R. ( 1996) The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Jacobs D. and Carmichael JT ( 2002) The political sociology of the death penalty: A pooled time-series analysis. American Sociological Review67(1): 109-131.
31.
Jacobs D. and Kent SL ( 2007) The determinants of executions since 1951: How politics, protests, public opinion, and social divisions shape capital punishment . Social Problems54(3): 297-318.
32.
Kirchmeier J. ( 1998) Aggravating and mitigating factors: The paradox of today’s arbitrary and mandatory capital punishment scheme. William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal6(2): 345-396.
33.
Kirchmeier Jeffrey ( 2006) Casting a wider net: Another decade of legislative expansion of the death penalty in the United States. Pepperdine Law Review34(1): 1-40.
34.
Langer L. and Brace P. ( 2005) The preemptive power of state supreme courts: Adoption of abortion and death penalty legislation. Policy Studies Journal33(3): 317-340.
35.
Latzer B. ( 2002) Death Penalty Cases. New York : Butterworth-Heinemann.
36.
Liebman J. ( 2000) The overproduction of death. Columbia Law Review100(8): 2030-2156.
37.
Llewelyn K. and Adamson Hoebel E. ( 1941) The Cheyenne Way. Norman, OK : University of Oklahoma Press.
38.
Lynch M. ( 2002) Capital punishment as moral imperative: Pro-death penalty discourse on the Internet. Punishment and Society4(2): 213-236.
39.
McAdams J. ( 1998) Racial disparity and the death penalty. Law and Contemporary Problems61(4): 153-170.
40.
McCarthy JR ( 2005) Implications of county variance in New Jersey capital murder cases: Arbitrary decision-making by county prosecutors. New York Law School Journal of Human Rights19(3): 969-996.
41.
McCord D. ( 2005) Lightning still strikes: Evidence from the popular press that death sentencing continues to be unconstitutionally arbitrary more than three decades after Furman. Brooklyn Law Review72(2): 797-870.
42.
Messner SF, Baumer EP and Rosenfeld R. ( 2006) Distrust of government, the vigilante tradition, and support for capital punishment. Law & Society Review40(3): 559-590.
43.
Mooney CZ and Lee MH ( 2000) The influence of values on consensus and contentious morality policy: US death penalty reform, 1956-82. Journal of Politics62(1): 223-239.
44.
Ogletree C. ( 2002) Black man’s burden: Race and the death penalty in America. Oregon Law Review81(1): 15-37.
45.
Radelet M. and Pierce G.(2009) Racial and ethnic disparities in resolving homicides. In: Lanier CS, Bowers WJ and Acker JR (eds) The Future of America’s Death Penalty: An Agenda for the Next Generation of Capital Punishment Research. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 113-134.
46.
Riessman CK ( 1993) Narrative Analysis. Los Angeles, CA : SAGE.
47.
Rock PE ( 1993) The Social World of an English Crown Court. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
Sarat A. ( 1999) The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Sarat A. ( 2002) When the State Kills: Capital Punishment and the American Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50.
Sarat A, Constable M , Engel D, Hans V and Lawrence S (eds) ( 1998) Everyday Practices and Trouble Cases: Fundamental Issues in Law and Society Research. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.
51.
Simon J. and Spaulding C. ( 1999) Tokens of our esteem: Aggravating factors in the era of deregulated death penalties. In: Sarat A (ed.) The Killing State: Capital Punishment in Law, Politics and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press, 81-116.
52.
Soss J., Langbein L. and Metelko AR ( 2003) Why do white Americans support the death penalty ? Journal of Politics65(2): 397-421.
53.
Stack S. ( 2000) Support for the death penalty: A gender-specific model . Sex Roles43(3-4): 163-179.
54.
Stanko E (ed.) (2003) The Meanings of Violence. New York: Routledge .
55.
Steiker C. ( 2002) Capital punishment and American exceptionalism . Oregon Law Review81(1): 97-130.
56.
Sudnow D. ( 1965) Normal crimes: Sociological features of the penal code in a public defender office. Social Problems12(3): 255-276.
57.
Tabak RJ (ed.) (1994) The death of fairness? Counsel competency and due process in death penalty cases . Houston Law Review31(4): 1105-1204.
58.
Tilly C. ( 2009) Credit and Blame. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59.
Unnever JD and Cullen FT ( 2007) The racial divide in support for the death penalty: Does white racism matter? Social Forces85(3): 1281-1301.
60.
Vick DW ( 1995) Poorhouse justice: Underfunded indigent defense services and arbitrary death sentences. Buffalo Law Review43(2): 329-460.
61.
Weisberg R. ( 1983) Deregulating death. Supreme Court Review1983: 305-396.
62.
Whitman JQ ( 2003) Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
63.
Yang B. and Lester D. ( 2008) The deterrent effect of executions: A meta-analysis thirty years after Ehrlich. Journal of Criminal Justice36(5): 453-460.
64.
Zimring F. ( 2004) Contradictions of Capital Punishment. New York: Oxford University Press.
65.
Zižek S. ( 2008) Violence: Six Sideways Reflections. New York: Basic Books.
