This article draws on interviews with Youth Court magistrates to examine if and how discourses, strategies and technologies of risk governance have affected Youth Court magistrates in England and Wales. The aim of the article is to detail the complex relationship between magisterial agency in decision making and youth justice policies which focus on risk control and management. The article demonstrates that, contrary to what might be assumed from the youth and risk governance theoretical literature, Youth Offending Team risk assessments form only one part of the information used by magistrates to explain young people’s presence in courts. This article concludes that magisterial decision making is framed not by formal, expert assessments of risk, but by magistrates’ claims that they are ‘knowing outsiders’, who through judicious use of information presented to them and their own life experiences are able to make objective judgements about both the risk assessments authored by Youth Offending Teams and the young lawbreakers before them.
Armstrong D.A risky business? Research, policy and governmentality and youth offending . Youth Justice2004; 4(2): 100-16.
2.
Baker K.Assessment in youth justice: Professional discretion and the use of asset . Youth Justice2005; 2(5): 106-22.
3.
Brown S.Magistrates at Work. Buckinghamshire: Open University Press, 1991.
4.
Carlen P.Women’s Imprisonment. London: RKP, 1983.
5.
Carlen P (ed.) Imaginary Penalities. Devon: Willan Publishing, 2009.
6.
Chapman T., Hough M.Evidence Based Practice: A Guide to Effective Practice. London: Home Office, 1998.
7.
Cheliotis L.How iron is the iron cage of the new penology. Punishment & Society2006; 8(3): 313-40.
8.
Dixon J.The organisation context of criminal sentencing. American Journal of Sociology1995; 100(5): 1157-98.
9.
Eadie T., Canton R.Practising in a context of ambivalence: The challenge for youth justice workers . Youth Justice2002; 1(2): 14-26.
10.
Feeley M., Simon J.The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications . Criminology1992; 30(4): 449-74.
11.
Fergusson R.Making sense of the melting pot: Multiple discourses in youth justice policy . Youth Justice2007; 7(3): 179-94.
12.
Field S.Practice cultures and the ‘‘new’’ youth justice in (England and) Wales. British Journal of Criminology2007; 47(2): 311-30.
13.
Glaser B.Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussion. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 1998.
14.
Goldson B.Youth (in)justice: Contemporary developments in policy and practice. In: Barry G (ed.) Youth Justice: Contemporary Policy and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999, p.1-18.
15.
Goldson B.‘‘Children in need’’ or ‘‘young offenders’’? Hardening ideology, organisational change and new challenges for social work with children in trouble. Child and Family Social Work2000; 5(3): 255-65.
16.
Goldson B.New labour, social justice and children: Political calculation and the deserving-undeserving schism. British Journal of Social Work2002 ; 32(6): 683-95.
17.
Goldson B.Taking liberties: Policy and the punitive turn. In: Hendrick H (ed.) Children and Social Policy: An Essential Reader. Bristol: Policy Press, 2005, p.255-68.
Halliday S., Burns N., Hutton N., McNeill F., Tata C.Street-level bureaucracy, inter-professional relations and coping mechanisms: A study of criminal justice social workers in the sentencing process. Law & Policy2009; 31(4): 405-28.
20.
Hawkins K.Law as Last Resort. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
21.
Heddernan C, Gelsthorpe L (eds) Understanding the Sentencing of Women. HORS170London: The Stationery Office, 1997.
22.
Hughes N.Managerialism subverted? Exploring the activity of youth justice practitioners . In: Michael B, Prior D (eds) Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press, 2009, p.155-70.
23.
Kempf-Leonard K., Peterson E.Expanding realms of the new penology: The advent of actuarial justice for juveniles. Punishment & Society2000; 2(1): 66-97.
24.
Kemshall H.Understanding Risk in Criminal Justice. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2003.
25.
Kemshall H.Risks, rights and justice: Understanding and responding to youth risk. Youth Justice2008; 8(1): 21-37.
26.
Lipsky M.Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980.
27.
McBarnet D.Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice. London: Macmillan, 1981.
Miller P., Rose N.Governing the Present. Cambridge: Polity, 2008.
30.
Millie A., Tombs J., Hough M.Borderline sentencing: A comparison of sentencers’ decision-making in England and Wales and Scotland. Criminology and Criminal Justice2007; 7(3): 242-67.
31.
Muncie J.Youth justice: Institutionalized intolerance: Youth Justice and the 1998 Criminal Justice Act. Critical Social Policy1999; 19(2): 147-75.
32.
Muncie J.Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy2006; 26(4): 770-93.
33.
Parker H., Sumner M., Jarvis G.Unmasking the Magistrates. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1989.
34.
Pratt J, Brown D , Hallsworth S, Brown M, Morrison W (eds) The New Punitiveness: Trends, Theories, Perspectives. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 2005 .
35.
Prior D.Policy power and the potential for counter-agency. In: Michael B, Prior D (eds) Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press, 2009, p.17-32.
36.
Rose N.The death of the social? Refiguring the territory of government. Economy and Society1996; 25(3): 327-56.
37.
Rumgay J.Custodial decision making in a magistrates’ court. British Journal of Criminology1995; 35(2): 201-17.
38.
Sanders A., Young R.Criminal Justice. London: Butterworth , 2000.
39.
Scraton P.Streets of terror: Marginalization and criminalization, and authoritarian renewal. Social Justice2004; 31(1-2): 130-57.
40.
Scraton P., Haydon D.Challenging the criminalization of children and young people: Securing a rights based agenda. In: Muncie J, Hughes G, McLaughlin E (eds) Youth Justice: Critical Readings. London: SAGE, 2002, p.311-28.
Smith R.Actuarialism and early intervention in contemporary youth justice. In: Barry G, Muncie J (eds) Youth Crime and Justice: Critical Issues . London: SAGE, 2006, p.78-91.
43.
Souhami A.Transforming Youth Justice: Occupational Identity and Cultural Change. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 2007 .
44.
Tata C., Burns N., Halliday S., Hutton N., McNeill F.Assisting and advising the sentencing process: The pursuit of ‘‘quality’’ in pre-sentence reports. British Journal of Criminology2008; 48(6): 835-55.
Westmarland L., Clarke J.Awkward customers? Policing in a consumer age. In: Michael B, Prior D (eds) Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services. Bristol: Policy Press, 2009, p.171-90.
47.
Worrall A.Offending Women: Female Lawbreakers and the Criminal Justice System. London: Routledge, 1990.
