The question addressed is whether prison inmates have a moral right of access to recreation, entertainment and diversion. The interests grounding such a right are first discussed. I then consider whether and to what extent a theory of legal punishment that incorporates both retributive and crime reduction aims, while giving primacy to the former, supports such a right. It is argued that such a theory supports a moral right to at least moderate levels of prisoner access to recreation, entertainment and diversion. Two further issues are then discussed - first, whether the state has an obligation to actually facilitate such access as opposed to simply not interfering with it, and second, what restrictions the state can reasonably impose on such access.
Bentham, Jeremy
(1789/1970) An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Ed. J.H. Burns and H.L.A. Hart. London: Methuen.
2.
Bonta, James
and Paul Gendreau (1990) ‘Reexamining the cruel and unusual punishment of prison life’, Law and Human Behavior14(4): 347-372.
3.
Council of Europe
(1987) European prison rules. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publications.
4.
Cullen, Francis T.
, Patricia Van Voorhis and Jody L. Sundt (1996) ‘Prisons in crisis: The American experience’, in Roger Matthews and Peter Francis (eds) Prisons 2000: An international perspective on the current state and future of imprisonment, pp. 21-52. New York: St Martin’s Press.
5.
Feinberg, Joel
(1984) Harm to others. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Finn, Peter
(1997) ‘Two new prisons rise for Virginia’s toughest convicts’, Washington Post 23 June: A1.
7.
First United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders (1955) Standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners. Section 21.
8.
Gendreau, Paul
(1996) ‘Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done’, Criminal Justice and Behavior23(1): 144-161.
9.
Gendreau, Paul
and Robert Ross (1987) ‘Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980’s’, Justice Quarterly4(3): 349-407.
10.
Goldman, Alan
(1979) ‘The paradox of punishment’, Philosophy and Public Affairs9(1): 42-58.
11.
Grasmick, Harold G.
and George J. Bryjack (1980) ‘The deterrent effect of perceived severity of punishment’, Social Forces59(2): 471-491.
12.
Haney, Craig
and Mona Lynch (1997) ‘Regulating prisons of the future: A psychological analysis of supermax and solitary confinement’, New York University Review of Law & Social Change23(4): 477-570.
13.
Hull, John D.
(1994) ‘Building a better thug?’, Time 11 April: 47.
14.
Kleinig, John
(1998) ‘The hardness of hard treatment’, in Andrew Ashworth and Martin Wasik (eds) Fundamentals of sentencing theory, pp. 273-298. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
15.
Lee, Robert D.
(1996) ‘Prisoners’ rights to recreation: Quantity, quality, and other aspects’, Journal of Criminal Justice24(2): 167-178.
16.
Lippke, Richard L.
(2001) ‘Criminal offenders and right forfeiture’, Journal of Social Philosophy32(1): 78-89.
17.
Mackie, J.L.
(1984) ‘Rights, utility, and universalization’, in R.G. Frey (ed.) Utility and rights, pp. 86-105. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
18.
Martin, Rex
(1993) A system of rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19.
Murphy, Jeffrie G.
(1973) ‘Marxism and retribution’, Philosophy and Public Affairs2(3): 217-243.
20.
Mushlin, Michael
(1993) Rights of prisoners. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Nagin, Daniel S.
(1998) ‘Criminal deterrence research at the outset of the twenty-first century’, in Michael Tonry (ed.) Crime and justice: A review of research 23, pp. 1-42. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Nozick, Robert
(1974) Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Paternoster, Raymond
(1987) ‘The deterrent effect of the perceived certainty and severity of punishment’, Justice Quarterly4(2): 173-217.
24.
Quinn, Warren
(1985) ‘The right to threaten and the right to punish’, Philosophy and Public Affairs14(4): 327-373.
25.
Raz, Joseph
(1986) The morality of freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
26.
Sadurski, Wojciech
(1985) Giving desert its due. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
27.
Sher, George
(1987) Desert. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
28.
Von Hirsch, Andrew
(1993) Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29.
Von Hirsch, Andrew
and Nils Jareborg (1991) ‘Gauging criminal harm: A living-standard analysis’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies11(1): 1-38.
30.
Waldron, Jeremy
(1989) ‘Rights in conflict’, Ethics99(3): 503-519.
