Ashworth, A.
(2000) Sentencing and criminal justice, 3rd edn.London: Butterworths.
2.
Blunkett, D.
(2001) ‘Put sense back into sentencing’, Home Office news release, 5 July.
3.
Fletcher, G.
(1982) ‘The recidivist premium’, Criminal Justice Ethics1(2): 54-59.
4.
Greenwood, P.W.
(1982) Selective incapacitation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
5.
Home Office
(2001a) Criminal justice: The way ahead. London: Home Office.
6.
Home Office
(2001b) Making punishments work: Report of a review of the sentencing framework for England and Wales. London: Home Office.
7.
Lösel, F.
(2001) ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of correctional programs: Bridging the gap between research and practice’, in G. Bernfeld, D.P. Farrington and A. Lescheid (eds) Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs. Chichester: John Wiley.
8.
Morris, N.
(1951) The habitual criminal. London: Longmans, Green.
9.
Morris, N.
(1976) Punishment, desert and rehabilitation. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
10.
Morris, N.
(1982) Madness and the criminal law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
11.
Morris, N.
and M. Miller (1985) ‘Predictions of dangerousness’, in M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds) Crime and justice: An annual review of research 6, pp. 1-50. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Morris, N.
and M. Tonry (1990) Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
National Academy of Sciences, Panel on Research on Criminal Careers
(1986) ‘Report’, in A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. Roth and C. Visher (eds) Criminal careers and ‘career criminals’, vol. 1, ch. 5, pp. 109-154. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
14.
Straw, J.
(1996) ‘Honesty, consistency and progression in sentencing’, paper for the Parliamentary Labour Party Home Affairs Committee.
15.
Straw, J.
(2001) ‘Next steps in criminal justice reform’, speech before Social Market Foundation, 31 January.
16.
Tonry, M.
(1994) ‘Proportionality, parsimony, and interchangeability of punishments’, in A. Duff, S. Marshall, R.E. Dobash and R.P. Dobash (eds) Penal theory and practice: Tradition and innovation in criminal justice, pp. 59-83. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
17.
Tonry, M.
(1998) ‘Interchangeability, desert limits and equivalence of function’, in A. von Hirsch and A. Ashworth (eds) Principled sentencing: Readings on theory and policy, 2nd edn, pp. 291-296. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
18.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1976) Doing justice: The choice of punishments. New York: Hill & Wang.
19.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1986) Past or future crimes: Deservedness and dangerousness in the sentencing of criminals. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
20.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1993) Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1995) ‘Proportionality and parsimony in American sentencing guidelines: The Minnesota and Oregon standards’, in C.M.V. Clarkson and R. Morgan (eds) The politics of sentencing reform, pp. 149-167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1998a) ‘Desert and previous convictions’, in A. von Hirsch and A. Ashworth (eds) Principled sentencing: Readings on theory and policy, 2nd edn, pp. 191-197. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
23.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1998b) ‘Selective incapacitation: Some doubts’, in A. von Hirsch and A. Ashworth (eds) Principled sentencing: Readings on theory and policy, 2nd edn, pp. 121-127. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
24.
Von Hirsch, A.
(1999) ‘Punishment, penance and the state: A reply to Duff’, in M. Matravers (ed.) Punishment and political theory, pp. 69-82. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
25.
Von Hirsch, A.
and A. Ashworth, eds (1998) Principled sentencing: Readings on theory and policy, 2nd edn.Oxford: Hart Publishing.
26.
Von Hirsch, A.
, A.E. Bottoms, E. Burney and P.-O. Wikström (1999) Criminal deterrence and sentence severity: An analysis of recent research. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
27.
Wasik, M.
and A. von Hirsch (1994) ‘Section 29 revised: Previous convictions in sentencing’, Criminal Law ReviewJune: 409-418.
