Torture is prohibited by customary international law. Yet the practice widely persists. Beneath the rhetoric of human rights talk the utilitarian justification of torture commands a good deal of support among police and security agencies and is detectable between the lines of the discourse of denial. Can torture be justified on utilitarian grounds? Close examination of Bentham's defence of torture, and the reasoning of the Landau Report in support of `moderate physical pressure' in Israel, suggests that it cannot. The practice of torture will arguably best be countered by confronting the subterranean utilitarian justifications of torture on their own terms: in the long term it does not work but, rather, undermines the legitimacy of the state itself.
Amnesty International
(1989) Turkey: torture and deaths in custody. London: Amnesty International, International Secretariat.
2.
Amnesty International
(1996) Turkey: no security without human rights. London: Amnesty International, International Secretariat.
3.
Ashworth, A.
(1998) The criminal process: an evaluative study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
4.
Bellamy, R.
(1995) Beccaria: on crimes and punishments and other writings, trans. Richard Davies. Cambridge: CUP.
5.
Bentham, J.
(1777-9) `Of torture', previously unpublished manuscript edited by Twining & Twining in `Bentham on torture', Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly (1973) 24(3): 307-356.
6.
B'Tselem
(1991) The interrogation of Palestinians during the Intifada: ill-treatment, `moderate physical pressure' or torture?Jerusalem: B'Tselem.
7.
B'Tselem
(1992) The interrogation of Palestinians during the Intifada: follow-up to March 1991 B'Tselem report. Jerusalem: B'Tselem.
8.
Chaffee, Z.
, Pollock, W.H. and Stern, C.S. (1931) `The third degree: report on lawlessness in law enforcement', National Commission on Law Observance and Enforcement, Vol. IV, no. II. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
9.
Cohen, S.
(1993) `Human rights and crimes of the state: the culture of denial', Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology26: 87.
10.
Council of Europe
(1992) Public statement on Turkey. CPT, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
11.
Council of Europe
(1996) Public statement on Turkey. CPT, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
12.
Council of Europe
(1999) Report to the Turkish government on the visit to Turkey carried out by the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from 5-17 October 1997. CPT, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
13.
Dershowitz, A.
(1989) `Is it necessary to apply “physical pressure” to terrorists - and to lie about it?', Israeli Law Review24: 192-200.
14.
du Bois, P.
(1991) Torture and Truth. New York: Routledge.
15.
Evans, M.
and Morgan, R. (1998) Preventing torture: a study of the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
Gemalmaz, M.S.
(1999) `The CPT and Turkey', in R. Morgan and M. Evans (eds) Protecting prisoners: the standards of the Committee for the Prevention of Torture in Context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
17.
Gudjonsson, G.
(1996) `Custodial confinement, interrogation and coerced confessions', in D. Forrest (ed.) A glimpse of hell: reports on torture worldwide. London: Amnesty International UK.
18.
Horne, A.
(1987) A savage war of peace: Algeria 1954-62. London: Macmillan.
19.
Human Rights Foundation of Turkey (HRFT)
(1996) Turkey human rights report 1995. Ankara: HRFT.
20.
Human Rights Watch
(1993) The Kurds in Turkey: killings, disappearances and torture. New York: Human Rights Watch.
21.
Kremnitzer, M.
(1989) `The Landau Commission report: was the security service subordinated to the law, or the law to the “needs” of the security service?', Israeli Law Review24: 216-279.
22.
Krousher, W.
(1985) Physical interrogation techniques. Port Townsend, WA: Loompanics.
23.
Landau Commission
(1987) Report of the Commission of Inquiry into the methods of investigation of the general security service regarding hostile terrorist activity, part one. Jerusalem: Israeli Government.
24.
Langbein, J.H.
(1977) Torture and the law of proof. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
25.
Maran, R.
(1989) Torture: the role of ideology in the French Algerian war. New York: Praeger.
26.
Millet, K.
(1994) The politics of cruelty: an essay on the literature of political imprisonment. London: Viking.
27.
Parker Report
(1972) Report of the Committee of Privy Counsellors appointed to consider authorised procedures for the interrogation of persons suspected of terrorism (Chairman, Lord Parker), Cmnd 4981, London: HMSO.
28.
Peters, E.
(1996) Torture. Pennsylvania, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
29.
Physicians for Human Rights
(1996) Torture in Turkey and its unwilling accomplices. Boston, MA: Physicians for Human Rights.
30.
Royal Commission
(1981) Report of the Royal Commission on criminal procedure. London: HMSO.
31.
Scarry, E.
(1984) The body in pain. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Zuckerman, A.
(1989) `Coercion and judicial ascertainment of truth', Israeli Law Review24: 357-374.
