This article reports on a set of findings from an ethnographic research project conducted in a parole field office in central California, specifically addressing how the notion of rehabilitation is expressed in parole discourse and practices. It appears that while the agency (and its field agents) still espouse the validity of normalization and reformative goals in this arm of corrections, the resources and commitment to carry out those aims are in short supply. Consequently, agency actors appear to have constructed the parolee subject as one who is dispositionally flawed, and who is ultimately responsible for his own improvement. The findings are discussed in relation to Simon's (1993) analysis of the agency's struggle to construct a plausible account of parole's purpose in the face of shifting structural, political, and institutional demands.
Abadinsky, Howard
(1978) `Parole history: an economic perspective', Offender Rehabilitation2: 275-278.
2.
Allen, Francis
(1981) The decline of the rehabilitative ideal. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3.
Allen, Harry
, Eskridge, Chris, Latessa, Edward and Vito, Gennaro (1985) Probation and parole in America. New York: The Free Press.
4.
Applegate, Brandon
, Cullen, Francis and Fisher, Bonnie (1997) `Public support for correctional treatment: the continuing appeal of the rehabilitative ideal', The Prison Journal77: 237-258.
5.
Associated Press
(1999) `Report: Silicon Valley growth slows, economy shows signs of inequality', San Francisco Chronicle8 January.
6.
Blomberg, Thomas
and Lucken, Karol (1994) `Stacking the deck by piling up sanctions: is intermediate punishment destined to fail?', Howard Journal33: 62-80.
7.
Bottoms, Anthony
(1983) `Neglected features of contemporary penal systems', in D. Garland and P. Young (eds) The power to punish. London: Heinemann.
8.
California Department of Corrections (CDC)
(not date) Parolee information handbook. CA: Prison Industry Authority.
9.
California Department of Corrections (CDC)
(1992) Supervised parole. CA: CDC Communications.
10.
California Department of Corrections (CDC)
(1996a) Institution and parole population and movements summary: calendar year 1995. CA: Data Analysis Unit.
11.
California Department of Corrections (CDC)
(1996b) Region II training bulletin, April 1996.
12.
Cavender, Gray
(1978) `Parole and rehabilitation: the false link', New England Journal on Prison Law5: 1-20.
13.
Cavender, Gray
(1982) Parole: a critical analysis. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.
14.
Chance, Amy
(1994) `Governor's parole policy under fire', Sacramento Bee, 14 January, A1.
15.
Clarke, Ronald
and Cornish, Derek (1985) `Modeling offender's decisions: a framework for research and policy', in M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds) Crime and justice, vol. 7. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
Clegg, Reed
(1964) Probation and parole: principles and practices. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
17.
Cohen, Stanley
(1985) Visions of social control. New York: Polity Press.
18.
Cornish, Derek
and Clarke, Ronald, eds (1986) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer Verlag.
19.
Cullen, Francis
, Cullen, J. and Wozniak, J. (1988) `Is rehabilitation dead? The myth of the punitive public', Journal of Criminal Justice34: 379-392.
20.
Feeley, Malcolm
and Simon, Jonathan (1992) `The new penology: notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications', Criminology30: 449-474.
21.
Foucault, Michel
(1977) Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.
22.
Friedman, Lawrence
(1993) Crime and punishment in American history. New York: Basic Books.
23.
Fulton, Betsy
, Stichman, Amy, Travis, Lawrence and Latessa, Edward (1997) `Moderating probation and parole officer attitudes to achieve desired outcomes', The Prison Journal77: 295-312.
24.
Garland, David
(1990) Punishment and modern society: a study in social theory. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
25.
Garland, David
(1995) `Penal modernism and postmodernism', in T. Blomberg and S. Cohen (eds) Punishment and social control: essays in honor of Sheldon L. Messinger, pp. 181-209. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
26.
Garland, David
(1996) `The limits of the sovereign state: strategies of crime control in contemporary society', The British Journal of Criminology36(4): 445-471.
27.
Giardini, G. I.
(1959) The parole process. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
28.
Haney, Craig
(1982) `Criminal justice and the nineteenth-century paradigm', Law and Human Behavior6: 191-235.
29.
Lerner, Melvin
(1980) The belief in a just world: a fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
30.
Lynch, Mona
(1998) `Waste managers? The new penology, crime fighting, and the parole agent identity', Law and Society Review32.
31.
McCleary, Richard
(1978) Dangerous men: the sociology of parole. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
McCorkle, Richard
and Crank, John (1996) `Meet the new boss: institutional change and loose coupling in parole and probation', American Journal of Criminal Justice21: 1-25.
33.
Martinson, Robert
(1974) What works? Questions and answers about prison reform', Public Interest35: 22-54.
34.
Messinger, Sheldon
, Berecochea, John, Berk, Richard and Rauma, David (1988) Parolees returned to prison and the California prison population, BCS collaborative report. Sacramento, CA: CA Department of Justice.
35.
Messinger, Sheldon
, Berecochea, John, Rauma, David and Berk, Richard (1985) `The foundations of parole in California', Law and Society Review19: 69-106.
36.
Miller, Martin
(1974) `At hard labor: rediscovering the 19th century prison', Issues in Criminology9: 91-114.
37.
Montes, Marisela
(1996) Technological advances in parole supervision', Corrections Today58: 88-91.
38.
Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 US 471 (1972).
39.
O'Malley, Pat
(1992) `Risk, power, and crime prevention', Economy and Society21: 252-275.
40.
O'Malley, Pat
(1993) `Containing our excitement: commodity culture and the crisis of discipline', Studies in Law, Politics, and Society', 13: 159-186.
41.
O'Malley, Pat
(1997) `Policing, politics, and postmodernity', Social and Legal Studies6: 363-381.
42.
Pisciotta, Alexander
(1994) Benevolent repression: social control and the American reformatory-prison movement. New York: New York University Press.
43.
Rafter, Nicole
(1994) `Eugenics, class, and the professionalization of social control', in G. Bridges and M. Myers (eds) Inequality, crime and social control, pp. 215-226. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44.
Reichman, Nancy
(1986) `Managing crime risks: toward an insurance based model of social control', Research in Law and Social Control8: 151-172.
45.
Rose, Nikolas
(1988) `Calculable minds and manageable individuals', History of the Human Sciences1: 179-200.
46.
Ross, Lee
and Nisbett, Richard (1991) The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Rothman, David
(1980) Conscience and convenience: the asylum and its alternatives in progressive America. Toronto: Little, Brown.
48.
Rothman, David
(1995) `More of the same: American criminal justice policies in the 1990s', in T. Blomberg and S. Cohen (eds) Punishment and social control: essays in honor of Sheldon L. Messinger, pp. 29-44. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
49.
Simon, Jonathan
(1987) `The emergence of a risk society: insurance law and the state', Socialist Review95: 61-89.
50.
Simon, Jonathan
(1993) Poor discipline: parole and the social underclass, 1890-1990. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
51.
Simon, Jonathan
(1995) `Law and the postmodern mind: power without parents: juvenile justice in a postmodern society', Cardozo Law Review16: 1363-1426.
52.
Simon, Jonathan
and Feeley, Malcolm (1995) `True crime: the new penology and public discourse on crime', in T. Blomberg and S. Cohen (eds) Punishment and social control: essays in honor of Sheldon L. Messinger, pp. 147-180. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
53.
Smith, Albert
(1991) `Arming officers doesn't have to change an agency's mission', Corrections Today53: 114-124.
54.
Star, Deborah
(1981) Investigation and surveillance in parole supervision: an evaluation of the High Control Project. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections Research Unit.
