Review: Georgina Muskett,Mycenaean Art: A Psychological Approach. (British Archaeological Reports,Int. Ser. S1636,Oxford: Archaeopress,2007,77 pp.,pbk,ISBN 978-1-4073-0075-7)

Buss, D.M. , 2001. Human nature and culture: An evolutionary psychological perspective. Journal of Personality 69(6):155-178.

Deregowski, J.B. , 1989. Real space and represented space: cross-cultural perspectives . Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:51-119.

Deregowski, J.B. , 1995. Perception - depiction - perception, and communication: a skeleton key to rock art and its significance. Rock Art Research 12(1):3-22.

Engquist, M. and A. Arak , 1993. Selection of exaggerated male traits by female aesthetic senses. Nature 361(6411):446-448.

Latto, R. , 1995. The brain of the beholder. In R. Gregory et al. (eds), The Artful Eye: 66-94. Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Lindstrm, T.C. and S. Kristoffersen , 2001. ‘Figure it out!’ Psychological perspectives on perception of Migration Period animal art. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34(2):65-84.

Musgrave, J.H. , R.A.H. Neave and A.J.N.W. Prag , 1995. Seven faces from Grave Circle B at Mycenae. The Annual of the British School at Athens 90:107-36.

Nell, V. , 2006. Cruelty’s rewards: the gratification of perpetrators and spectators. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:211-257.

Reber, R. and N. Schwarz , 2006. Perceptual fluency, preference, and evolution . Polish Psychological Bulletin 37:16-22.